White House issues Executive Order addressing barriers to housing construction
Author
Jared Grigas
Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart
Kevin Moore
Andrew Nober
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
White House issues Executive Order addressing barriers to housing construction
Agencies are directed to revise federal policies that may impact housing construction timelines or increase costs, including environmental regulations and permitting, building and energy standards and historic preservation practices.
HUD is directed to develop regulatory best practices for state and local governments to promote housing development and reduce artificial costs.
On March 13, the White House issued an Executive Order (EO) titled “Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing Home Construction.” The EO directs agencies to review policies that impact housing development and identify opportunities to streamline processes and reduce regulatory costs. It also directs HUD to develop regulatory best practices for states and local governments to reduce regulatory barriers to housing construction. Counties that manage public infrastructure, such as stormwater systems, may see reduced regulatory requirements. At the same time, HUD-issued best practices may inform one-size-fits-all state policies that preempt local building standards.
What does the EO do?
Within 60 days of the EO’s issuance date, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is directed to develop a series of best practices for state and local governments to promote housing construction and streamline regulatory processes. The EO specifically identifies the following reforms:
Reducing building permit “shot clocks” and fees, which may increase the administrative burden on local building departments as they’re required to meet more demanding permit processing timelines
Allowing private providers to conduct building permit reviews and inspections
Eliminating arbitrary or unreasonable building code standards, especially those governing green or alternative energy
Reducing disparities between modular/manufactured housing and site-built housing, regarding construction, siting and aesthetic requirements
Eliminating restrictions on peripheral development, which may impact local land use policies, such as urban growth boundaries that seek to limit development impacts in agricultural and greenbelt land outside the urban core
The EO also requires specified agencies – including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) – to identify regulatory barriers to housing construction and make appropriate revisions to streamline processes and reduce costs. Specifically, the EPA and the Corps are directed to review and revise requirements related to stormwater, wetlands and other water resources, including:
Stormwater discharge permits and Municipal Separate Stormwater (MS4) system requirements: MS4 permits require counties and other system owners to use a stormwater management program to reduce pollutant discharge
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) standards: Counties use TMDL standards to identify polluted watersheds and reduce contaminants to improve water quality
Section 404 dredge and fill requirements, for both federal and state-assumed permitting authorities: Section 404 dredge and fill permits allow the U.S. Army Corps to authorize infrastructure projects such as building roads, bridges and installing utility lines in wetlands or waterways
Federal agencies are also instructed to examine energy-efficiency and water-use standards tied to housing programs, including requirements for manufactured housing and housing financed through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and HUD. In addition, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) will issue guidance on implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in ways that reduce burdens on housing and related infrastructure projects.
What does this mean for counties?
Counties play a central role in land use planning, zoning administration, permitting, development and environmental management. Changes to federal permitting, environmental review processes and housing program requirements may affect how counties coordinate with federal and state partners on development and infrastructure projects that support housing growth.
Additionally, new HUD-issued regulatory best practices may provide a blueprint for state-level preemption, particularly for local building department activities. NACo will continue to monitor threats to local authority as federal agency guidance is formalized.
Related News
U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee takes up reauthorization of EPA Brownfields program
U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee takes up reauthorization of EPA Brownfields program
NACo launches 2026 Rural Energy Academy Cohort to support county decision-making on new energy projects
NACo announces the launch of the 2026 Rural Energy Academy technical assistance cohort.
