U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announces it will uphold 2024 PFAS CERCLA rule

Author

Charlotte headshot

Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart

Associate Legislative Director, Environment, Energy & Land Use | Gulf Coast Regional Forum

Upcoming Events

Conference

2026 NCCAE Annual Meeting

Related News

County News

Texas symposium spurs energy talks

Personal perspective of man filling a glass of filtered water right from the tap in the kitchen at home

Key Takeaways

On September 17, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the agency will uphold the 2024 rule designating two types of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This is a concerning action for counties as liability protections for passive receivers of PFAS such as counties and other local governments are not included in the rule. 

Background

Counties are considered passive receivers of PFAS because the chemicals can be found in county owned infrastructure such as drinking water systems, wastewater treatment facilities and municipal solid waste landfills even though counties do not produce PFAS chemicals or release them into the environment. 

Impact of 2024 CERCLA rule for counties

The 2024 CERCLA rule authorized EPA to investigate releases of hazardous PFAS chemicals into the environment and compel responsible parties, including owners and operators of facilities and vessels, to clean up contaminated sites or to reimburse EPA for the cost of cleanup. Responsible parties are also able to sue other parties they believe to be responsible for contamination, such as counties, to recover cleanup costs. 

The enforcement discretion policy that EPA issued alongside the CERCLA rule does not provide explicit protection for passive receivers as it does not prevent other responsible parties from suing county governments to recover cleanup costs. While EPA stated that enforcement actions would focus on manufacturers of PFAS and not passive receivers, the enforcement discretion policy is not legally binding and could be changed in the future. If liability protection is not given to passive receivers, counties may still face exposure to legal liability for the cleanup of PFAS contamination.

Next steps for counties

Legislation is needed to codify liability protections for counties and other passive receivers of PFAS. Counties should urge their members of Congress to provide passive receivers with the necessary liability relief.  If not granted an exemption, counties could be forced to pay for the cleanup of substances in which they had no role in the creation or distribution – shifting the ‘polluter pays’ principle of the law to a ‘community pays’ model, placing the burden of compliance and cleanup onto ratepayers and residents.

NACo will continue to advocate for legislation that ensures counties and local governments are explicitly recognized as passive receivers of PFAS and are provided a narrow liability exemption under CERCLA.

Additional resources

Full EPA Announcement

NACo PFAS Hub

NACo PFAS One Pager

2165857864
Advocacy

U.S. Senators introduce bipartisan comprehensive permitting reform package with major county wins

On Sep. 30, the leaders of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (S. 5653), a comprehensive, bipartisan permitting reform package that would make major changes to several federal environmental protection statutes.

Hemphill County, Texas Judge Lisa Johnson (left) and Cochran County, Texas Judge Pat Henry listen to a discussion about philanthropic organizations managing community benefit agreements. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Foundations navigate community benefit agreements

Philanthropic organizations offer a specialized approach to managing proceeds from community benefit agreements struck between counties and energy companies.

Carson County, Texas Judge Dan Looten (center) talks to Hodgeman County, Kan. Commissioner Mike Schraeder about wind power during a visit to the Panhandle Wind Project Development in Carson County. To the right, El Paso County, Texas Senior Policy Analyst Ramon Bracamontes take a photo of a nearby wind turbine. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Texas symposium spurs energy talks

The road to domestic energy independence will be paved and maintained by counties, and more than 100 county leaders came to the Texas panhandle to learn how to make the most of the opportunity.