U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announces it will uphold 2024 PFAS CERCLA rule

Author

Charlotte headshot

Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart

Associate Legislative Director, Environment, Energy & Land Use | Gulf States, Counties & Parishes Caucus

Upcoming Events

Webinar

FAA-NACo Airport Land Use Compatibility

Related News

Advocacy

County Countdown – Dec. 1, 2025

Personal perspective of man filling a glass of filtered water right from the tap in the kitchen at home

Key Takeaways

On September 17, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the agency will uphold the 2024 rule designating two types of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This is a concerning action for counties as liability protections for passive receivers of PFAS such as counties and other local governments are not included in the rule. 

Background

Counties are considered passive receivers of PFAS because the chemicals can be found in county owned infrastructure such as drinking water systems, wastewater treatment facilities and municipal solid waste landfills even though counties do not produce PFAS chemicals or release them into the environment. 

Impact of 2024 CERCLA rule for counties

The 2024 CERCLA rule authorized EPA to investigate releases of hazardous PFAS chemicals into the environment and compel responsible parties, including owners and operators of facilities and vessels, to clean up contaminated sites or to reimburse EPA for the cost of cleanup. Responsible parties are also able to sue other parties they believe to be responsible for contamination, such as counties, to recover cleanup costs. 

The enforcement discretion policy that EPA issued alongside the CERCLA rule does not provide explicit protection for passive receivers as it does not prevent other responsible parties from suing county governments to recover cleanup costs. While EPA stated that enforcement actions would focus on manufacturers of PFAS and not passive receivers, the enforcement discretion policy is not legally binding and could be changed in the future. If liability protection is not given to passive receivers, counties may still face exposure to legal liability for the cleanup of PFAS contamination.

Next steps for counties

Legislation is needed to codify liability protections for counties and other passive receivers of PFAS. Counties should urge their members of Congress to provide passive receivers with the necessary liability relief.  If not granted an exemption, counties could be forced to pay for the cleanup of substances in which they had no role in the creation or distribution – shifting the ‘polluter pays’ principle of the law to a ‘community pays’ model, placing the burden of compliance and cleanup onto ratepayers and residents.

NACo will continue to advocate for legislation that ensures counties and local governments are explicitly recognized as passive receivers of PFAS and are provided a narrow liability exemption under CERCLA.

Additional resources

Full EPA Announcement

NACo PFAS Hub

NACo PFAS One Pager

County Countdown
Advocacy

County Countdown – Dec. 1, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership.

Image of naco-logo-canvas_xxneedsborder_0_0.jpeg
Press Release

Counties Celebrate Key Permitting Inclusions in SPEED Act

NACo issued the following statement in response to the passage of the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act (H.R. 4776), which advanced out of the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources on November 20.

Image of Bridge-construction_1.jpg
Advocacy

House Natural Resources Committee advances Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act

On November 20, the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources advanced the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act (H.R. 4776), which would make important changes to streamline federal permitting and strengthen county involvement in decision-making by amending the National Environmental Policy Act. Counties support commonsense permitting reforms, and NACo secured provisions in the SPEED Act that would guarantee counties a seat at the table during federal environmental reviews.