U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announces actions to combat PFAS contamination

Author

Charlotte headshot

Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart

Associate Legislative Director, Environment, Energy & Land Use | Gulf Coast Regional Forum
Rachel Yeung

Rachel Yeung

Associate Legislative Director, Agriculture & Rural Affairs | Rural Action Caucus

Upcoming Events

Conference

2026 NACo Energy Symposium

Related News

Aerial view of drinking water treatment plants for big city from water management

Key Takeaways

UPDATES:

On April 17, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that the agency is extending its public comment period for the Draft Sewage Sludge Risk Assessment for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) until August 14, 2025


On May 14, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will uphold the current National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), reaffirming its commitment to addressing PFAS contamination. This action extends PFOA and PFOS compliance deadlines for affected water systems, establishes a federal exemption framework and launches a new outreach effort—the PFAS OUTreach Initiative (PFAS OUT)—to support communities in meeting drinking water standards for “forever chemicals.” The initiative specifically targets rural and small water systems, offering tailored assistance.
Through PFAS OUT and its broader WaterTA (Water Technical Assistance) program, EPA will engage directly with public water systems that require capital improvements to address PFAS contamination. More information about the new PFAS OUT initiative to come. 


On April 28, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a new suite of upcoming actions to address contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These measures, outlined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, aim to strengthen scientific understanding, enhance enforcement and build partnerships with impacted communities, including counties and other local governments.

Relevant actions outlined by the EPA

The EPA’s latest announcement includes several provisions that will directly affect county governments and their residents. The following highlights are particularly relevant for counties:

Strengthening Science

  • Designating a lead within EPA to coordinate PFAS activities across the agency
  • Implementing new PFAS data collection and testing strategies
  • Updating PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance on an annual basis (previously every three years)
  • Accelerating the advancement of PFAS detection and treatment technologies

Fulfilling Statutory Obligations & Enhancing Communication

  • Developing and enforcing effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for PFAS manufacturers and metal finishers
  • Addressing compliance challenges related to national drinking water regulations for PFAS
  • Utilizing authority under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to respond to PFAS releases
  • Working with Congress and industry to establish a clear liability framework that ensures the polluter pays—not passive receivers such as counties

Building Partnerships

  • Advancing PFAS cleanup in contaminated drinking water systems
  • Collaborating with states and the public to develop PFAS risk assessment tools
  • Supporting state enforcement efforts, including review of air quality petitions related to PFAS
  • Providing resources for PFAS-related investigations to hold polluters accountable

What is PFAS and why does this matter to counties?

PFAS are a group of long-lasting, synthetic chemicals used in everything from food packaging and nonstick cookware to firefighting foam used by airports, the military and fire departments. Two common PFAS chemicals—PFOA and PFOS—have been linked to serious health issues, including certain cancers, immune suppression, reproductive harm and hormonal disruption.

As owners, users and regulators of water resources, counties are directly impacted by federal regulation and legislation regarding PFAS. Since PFAS are extremely persistent in the environment, counties are increasingly seeing detections in groundwater, surface water, soil and public water systems. Counties are passive receivers of PFAS as counties do not produce or release PFAS into the environment but are responsible for managing contamination through drinking water or wastewater systems. This puts counties at risk of being held liable for cleanup under federal law, particularly the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).

Ongoing advocacy

NACo continues to advocate for explicit liability protections for counties and other passive receivers. Without a narrow exemption, local governments could be forced to bear the cost of cleaning up pollutants they never created—shifting the burden from polluters to residents and taxpayers.

NACo supports the EPA’s efforts to establish a liability framework that protects passive receivers and holds actual polluters accountable. Local governments should not be penalized for contamination they did not cause, and any federal PFAS response must ensure that the “polluter pays” principle remains intact.

Counties remain committed to working alongside federal partners to protect public health, secure clean water and ensure fair environmental policies.

Additional Resources

Related News

Custer County, Mont. Commissioner Jason Strouf describes the complexity involved in fixing damage to an existing culvert. He spoke with other county officials at an April 20 Capitol Hill briefing. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Counties make their cases for permitting reform

County officials spoke out at a Capitol Hill briefing about the delays and costs resulting from permitting challenges and the reforms they’d like to see passed by Congress.

2233370239
Advocacy

U.S. Representatives introduce bipartisan CERTAIN Act to uphold county participation and streamline federal permitting

On April 15, congressional leaders introduced the bipartisan Create Expedited Reviews to Transform American Infrastructure Now (CERTAIN) Act. Led by Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.), Gabe Evans (R-Colo.), Andrew Gabarino (R-N.Y.), Adam Gray (D-Calif.), Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), the CERTAIN Act would strengthen county consultation and set actionable deadlines for federal environmental permitting processes.

2250530454
Advocacy

U.S. Department of Agriculture announces new environmental review regulations

On April 7, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published a final rule issuing new regulatory guidance for the department’s environmental review processes. The new rule affects how USDA implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and affects projects funded by the agency or occurring on land managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS).