U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announces actions to combat PFAS contamination
Author

Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart

Rachel Yeung
Upcoming Events
Related News

Key Takeaways
On April 28, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a new suite of upcoming actions to address contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These measures, outlined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, aim to strengthen scientific understanding, enhance enforcement and build partnerships with impacted communities, including counties and other local governments.
Relevant actions outlined by the EPA
The EPA’s latest announcement includes several provisions that will directly affect county governments and their residents. The following highlights are particularly relevant for counties:
Strengthening Science
- Designating a lead within EPA to coordinate PFAS activities across the agency
- Implementing new PFAS data collection and testing strategies
- Updating PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance on an annual basis (previously every three years)
- Accelerating the advancement of PFAS detection and treatment technologies
Fulfilling Statutory Obligations & Enhancing Communication
- Developing and enforcing effluent limitation guidelines (ELGs) for PFAS manufacturers and metal finishers
- Addressing compliance challenges related to national drinking water regulations for PFAS
- Utilizing authority under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to respond to PFAS releases
- Working with Congress and industry to establish a clear liability framework that ensures the polluter pays—not passive receivers such as counties
Building Partnerships
- Advancing PFAS cleanup in contaminated drinking water systems
- Collaborating with states and the public to develop PFAS risk assessment tools
- Supporting state enforcement efforts, including review of air quality petitions related to PFAS
- Providing resources for PFAS-related investigations to hold polluters accountable
What is PFAS and why does this matter to counties?
PFAS are a group of long-lasting, synthetic chemicals used in everything from food packaging and nonstick cookware to firefighting foam used by airports, the military and fire departments. Two common PFAS chemicals—PFOA and PFOS—have been linked to serious health issues, including certain cancers, immune suppression, reproductive harm and hormonal disruption.
As owners, users and regulators of water resources, counties are directly impacted by federal regulation and legislation regarding PFAS. Since PFAS are extremely persistent in the environment, counties are increasingly seeing detections in groundwater, surface water, soil and public water systems. Counties are passive receivers of PFAS as counties do not produce or release PFAS into the environment but are responsible for managing contamination through drinking water or wastewater systems. This puts counties at risk of being held liable for cleanup under federal law, particularly the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Ongoing advocacy
NACo continues to advocate for explicit liability protections for counties and other passive receivers. Without a narrow exemption, local governments could be forced to bear the cost of cleaning up pollutants they never created—shifting the burden from polluters to residents and taxpayers.
NACo supports the EPA’s efforts to establish a liability framework that protects passive receivers and holds actual polluters accountable. Local governments should not be penalized for contamination they did not cause, and any federal PFAS response must ensure that the “polluter pays” principle remains intact.
Counties remain committed to working alongside federal partners to protect public health, secure clean water and ensure fair environmental policies.
Additional Resources
Resource
Legislative Analysis: Impact of PFAS Regulations on Counties

Related News

NACo testifies before Congress on brownfields revitalization
On May 7, Oswego County, N.Y. Clerk Terry Wilbur testified on behalf of NACo before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment at a hearing titled “Cleaning Up the Past, Building the Future: The Brownfields Program”.

Podcast: Life after coal for one county
Commissioner Melody Villard and Economic Recovery Corps Fellow Sasha Nelson discuss the transition Moffat County, Colo. planned to diversify its economy after the closure of coal mines and a power plant decimated its property tax revenue.

For counties facing coal-fired power plant closures, learn from Lewis County, Wash.
Lewis County, Wash. Commissioner Sean Swope grew up in the county and over the past two years, he dove into economic diversification as a member of NACo’s BRECC Commitment Coalition. Below is a Q&A with him on the subject.