How Localities are Planning for the End of the American Rescue Plan Act
Upcoming Events
Related News
Jump to Section
As the December 2026 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program spending deadline approaches, local governments should evaluate the long-term fiscal needs of their American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funded programs. The end of this large federal investment in local government signals a period of uncertainty as localities may need to address budget shortfalls. According to the 2025 State of the Cities Report, 69 percent of respondents indicated the end of ARPA funding will negatively impact their budget and city management. To find examples of how other localities are continuing projects with other funding sources after ARPA dollars are spent, local leaders can search the Local Government ARPA Investment Tracker.
Local Government Investment Tracker Update
This piece accompanies our latest update to the Local Government ARPA Investment Tracker, a joint project of Brookings Metro, the National League of Cities (NLC), and the National Association of Counties (NACo). Since 2021, we have monitored how the largest U.S. cities and counties have appropriated, obligated, and spent $65 billion in SLFRF allocations to foster an equitable economic recovery from COVID-19.
This update reflects data from 19,348 projects reported by 334 large local governments (92 cities and 242 counties) to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for program activities conducted through December 31st, 2024. All recipients have until the end of 2026 to spend their obligated funds. For more information about how data is collected and analyzed for this project, please visit the dashboard.
As of December 31, 2024, Tier 1 cities and counties have obligated 100% of their SLFRF allocations. This is a huge accomplishment and means large local governments will not face clawbacks due to missing the obligation deadline. Additionally, large cities and counties are on track to meet the December 2026 spending deadline since 72% of funds have already been spent.
Figure 1
Large Local Governments Have Obligated or Expended 100 Percent of $65 Billion SLFRF Allocations
PERCENT (%) OF TIER 1 SLFRF ALLOCATIONS OBLIGATED OR SPENT THROUGH DECEMBER 2024
Source: NLC, Brookings Metro and NACo analysis of U.S. Treasury data covering 334 large local governments of the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program, part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), reporting through December 31st, 2024.
Note: The SLFRF program allocated $65 billion to the 92 largest cities and consolidated city-counties, and 242 counties.
The final obligated data show investment categories have remained stable over the past two years, even with the last-minute push to meet the obligation deadline. The data show over 42% of SLFRF Tier 1 funds have gone towards government operations investment projects, underscoring the importance of paying employee salaries, replacing lost revenue and upgrading government infrastructure for COVID-19 recovery. Large local governments have also obligated over 13% of funds to infrastructure investments, followed by housing as the largest investment categories for large localities. These investments highlight how localities have used funds to respond to the public health and economic emergencies while also strengthening communities for the future.
Figure 2
Large Cities and Counties Have Committed Most Funds to Government Operations or Infrastructure Projects
PERCENT (%) OF TIER 1 SLFRF ALLOCATIONS OBLIGATED, BY SPENDING CATEGORY
Source: NLC, Brookings Metro and NACo analysis of U.S. Treasury data covering 334 large local governments of the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program, part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), reporting through December 31st, 2024.
Note: The SLFRF program allocated $65 billion to the 92 largest cities and consolidated city-counties, and 242 counties.
Focusing on Fiscal Health Post-ARPA
While cities and counties are still working to spend remaining ARPA funds, local leaders might consider their localities’ funding needs once SLFRF allocations are spent. Using the downloadable data from the dashboard, local leaders can use keyword searches to explore localities that reported using other funding sources post-ARPA in project descriptions. While it is not necessary to report this information to the Treasury Department, local leaders might consider if projects will continue and need additional funding post-ARPA. Many ARPA projects supported staff salaries and impactful programming, and seeing these programs end outright once funds are spent would be a loss for the communities that invested in them. The following spotlights show ways counties and cities are continuing ARPA projects with other funding sources.
Chula Vista, California’s Public Works Department hired a new project management team to lead ARPA projects. This team is responsible for overseeing the project delivery of SLFRF Infrastructure projects and has developed efficient project delivery systems. These salaries will transition to the city’s general fund when ARPA ends because the city wants to continue focusing on efficiency and fast project delivery.
Salt Lake County, Utah launched a new program with the Salt Lake Center of Opportunity Partnership to support small businesses through grants and technical assistance. During the ARPA spending period, the county plans to support at least 7,500 businesses. Then the program will scale back to 1,500 annually to be sustainable without ARPA funding.
Looking Ahead to the 2026 Spending Deadline
ARPA was a transformational investment in local governments. Giving funds directly to cities and counties gave them flexibility around decision-making to invest in projects that were important to them and the federal government alike including infrastructure, workforce development, and public safety. As local governments finish spending down these obligations to meet the December 2026 spending deadline. They may be faced with difficult decisions around program wind-down. Defining this problem early is important for reducing the potential impact losing programs, and for finding alternative sustainable funding sources when possible.
Resource
Local Government ARPA Investment Tracker
County library cooks up interest with chef series
Orange County, Calif.'s library system drew in new patrons by introducing its offerings through a cooking video series.
County repurposes airport’s lost and found items for animal shelter
Broward County, Fla. staff made use out of items left behind at the county airport.
U.S. Congress passes reconciliation bill: What it means for counties
On July 3, the U.S. Congress passed sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.
U.S. Senate passes amended reconciliation bill text: What it means for counties
On July 1, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed their version of sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.
County Leaders Visit Washington to Share Local Perspective on Budget Reconciliation
Elected officials from five states sound alarm about administrative and funding changes to SNAP and Medicaid.
U.S. House passes rescissions package
On June 12, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R. 4) in a narrow 214-212 vote. The legislation would cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding, marking the Trump Administration’s first formal attempt to codify funding cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Cyber Resilience In Action: County Leaders Share Their Strategies
Join county IT leaders to hear how they are defending local government systems, staff, and constituents from ever-increasing cyber-attacks. The panelists will discuss specific examples of cyber-attacks they are experiencing, how elected officials are integral to the defense, as well as monitoring, education and interactive staff activities they provided during October Cybersecurity Awareness Month.
Document Management solutions for Public Agencies through NACo Public Promise Procurement
Friday, October 31, 2025 | 1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. ET
Explore the newest solutions for managing government documents and content with NACo, Maricopa County and Iron Mountain. Join us for an informative webinar unveiling NACo Public Promise Procurement's newest national contract for Offsite Document Management Services. This session will explore the full scope of services – from secure storage to shredding to digital transformation and cloud-native content platforms. You’ll hear from Lead Public Agency Maricopa County, Ariz. about the procurement process. Learn how your agency can leverage this competitively solicited agreement to enhance compliance, reduce costs and modernize records management.
This webinar is brought to you by NACo EDGE, establishing people, purchasing, and performance cost-saving solutions that can be applied to counties nationwide. EDGE is owned by NACo, advised by county leaders and 100% focused on solutions for U.S. Counties. Learn more about NACo EDGE here.
Modern Networks, Smarter Budgets: A County Leader’s Perspective
Join us for a fireside chat with Orleans County, NY, as they share how their team successfully transitioned from a traditional capital expense (CapEx) model to an operational expense (OpEx) model for network services.
When faced with rising maintenance costs and an expiring carrier contract, the county seized the opportunity to modernize its network and lock in predictable monthly costs. By bundling connectivity services with unified communications, they achieved immediate savings of over $124,000, eliminated recurring charges such as long-distance fees and third-party integration costs, and gained access to operational upgrades like call analytics and auto-attendants.
This shift not only strengthened financial planning through fixed monthly expenses but also freed up IT staff to focus on strategic initiatives.
Key takeaway: Rethinking your budget model can be just as impactful as upgrading your technology — delivering fiscal stability and enhanced services for your community.
Grant Management Success: Quality, Consistency, and Cost Control
Join a panel of Authorium’s alums of public service – having served in county, state, and federal offices – as they share their experience providing oversight and direction to departments awarding, managing, and leveraging grants.
Driving GenAI in County Government: A Collaborative, Outcomes-Focused Approach
Artificial intelligence—especially generative AI—is no longer a “future trend” for county governments. It’s here, and its impact depends on how it’s implemented. Successful projects don’t start and end with the IT department; they require strong collaboration across communications, customer service, and business units to ensure technology delivers real outcomes for residents.
Hear from Wyandotte County, KS, where a community speaking 31 languages and handling 50,000 calls a year with just three staff members needed a smarter way to serve residents. Learn how the county partnered across departments to design and deploy conversational digital agents that address real service challenges—while safeguarding data, maintaining public trust, and ensuring equitable access.