U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow decision in malicious prosecution case
Author
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Chiaverini v. Ohio, a case focused on the relationship between probable cause and malicious prosecution claims against local government. The petitioner, a jewelry store owner whose malicious prosecution lawsuit against the City of Napoleon, Ohio was dismissed by the Sixth Circuit because one of the several charges against him had probable cause. He asked the Court overturn that ruling on the grounds that a "charge-specific rule" should apply, allowing for a malicious prosecution claim to move forward for an invalid charge brought alongside charges supported by probable cause, even if it did not cause or lengthen a detention.
- County nexus: This case has implications for the ability of private citizens to file costly civil rights claims against police for alleged malicious prosecution, the vast majority of which are meritless but costly to litigate.
- NACo advocacy: In Local Government Legal Center Amicus Brief in support of the respondent, NACo urged the Court not to adopt the "charge-specific" rule urged by the petitioners, which would increase liabiltiy for counties indemnifying police officers and run the risk of creating a chilling effect on law enforcement and prosecutors. Learn more here.
- The Court's ruling: On June 20, the Court issued a 6-3 ruling that narrowly favored the petitioner, holding that that the existence of probable cause for one charge does not “create a categorical bar” against a malicious prosecution claim relating to other charges and vacating the Sixth Circuit's ruling to the contrary. However, the Court did not reject the respondent's position, echoed by the LGLC amicus brief, that unless the invalid charge caused or lengthened a detention, there is no Fourth Amendment violation. Learn more here.
While the Court's decision favored the respondent and remanded the case back to the Sixth Circuit, it does not meaningfully shift existing law and should not have a significant impact on the ability of counties to defend against claims of malicious prosecution so long as they did not extend or cause a detention.
2024-2025 Supreme Court Term
NACo Legal Advocacy: San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implications for the ability of county governments that own and operate wastewater treatment facilities to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Lackey v. Stinnie
Lackey v. Stinnie will impact the ability of state and local governments to avoid paying litigation fees in a civil rights case if they change their conduct (i.e. repeal a law) after a court has granted a preliminary injunction.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Garland v. VanDerStok
Garland v. VanDerStok has implications for the ability of county law enforcement to uphold public safety and investigate crimes involving ghost guns.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Stanley v. City of Sanford
Stanley v. City of Sanford will impact the ability of county governments to balance budgets by reducing or eliminating post-employment benefits for disability retirees.
NACo Legal Advocacy: EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera
EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera could make it more difficult for county governments to prove exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which would increase the potential for costly litigation.
Featured Initiative
Supreme Court Advocacy Hub
Related News
Report released on 1115 waiver implementation in California
In January 2023, California became the first state to receive federal approval for a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver to partially amend the Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy.
Utah Association of Counties takes on health benefits for EMTs
A program championed and managed by the state association will help rural counties attract and retain crucial volunteers for emergency responders.
CMS announces funding to improve the continuity of care for justice-involved individuals
On September 27, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced $106.5 million in state planning grants aimed at improving healthcare continuity for individuals transitioning from incarceration.