Supreme Court Update: Chiaverini vs. City of Napoleon
Upcoming Events
Related News
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/807x448/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=33db5b38&itok=5I2G3C1n)
Supreme Court Update: Chiaverini vs. City of Napoleon, Ohio
COUNTY NEXUS
When private citizens file meritless civil rights claims against police for alleged malicious prosecutions, counties can bear significant financial liability and practice of standard law enforcement may see a chilling effect.
BACKGROUND
This case focused on the constitutionality of the "any-crime" rule for a malicious prosecution claim, which says that when an individual receives multiple charges, probable cause for any one charge insulates every other charge from a malicious prosecution claim under Section 1983 unless a plaintiff shows that the addition of another, baseless charge caused or lengthened his detention. A jewelry store owner whose malicious prosecution lawsuit against the City of Napoleon, Ohio was dismissed on this basis argued that the "charge-specific rule" should apply, in which a malicious prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge, even if other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause, regardless of whether that charge actually caused or lengthened a detention.
NACo ADVOCACY
In a Local Government Legal Center Amicus Brief in support of the respondent, NACo argued that local governments and local law enforcement officers frequently face claims of malicious prosecution—the vast majority of which are meritless but costly to litigate. We urged the Court not to adopt the "charge-specific" rule urged by the petitioners as it would increase liability for counties indemnifying police officers and run the risk of creating a chilling effect on law enforcement and prosecutors.
CURRENT STATUS
On June 20, the Court issued a 6-3 ruling that narrowly favored the petitioner, holding that that the existence of probable cause for one charge does not “create a categorical bar” against a malicious prosecution claim relating to other charges and vacating the Sixth Circuit's ruling to the contrary. However, the Court did not reject the respondent's position, echoed by the LGLC amicus brief, that unless the invalid charge caused or lengthened a detention, there is no Fourth Amendment violation. The Sixth Circuit and other courts can still hold that a hold that a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution fails where there was probable cause for one charge as long as other invalid charges did not cause or lengthen the detention. Learn more here.
2023-2024 Supreme Court Term
![Fishing boat](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-07/GettyImages-1478187164.jpg?h=80e376df&itok=iidfURh6)
U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Chevron doctrine to reshape the federal administrative state
In major ruling, U.S. Supreme Court overturns longstanding precedent deferring to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous statute.
![Opioid-pills_4.jpg Image of Opioid-pills_4.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Opioid-pills_4_0.jpg?h=d73c3389&itok=_kAR4tLC)
U.S. Supreme Court decision halts Purdue Pharma opioid settlement
Supreme Court ruling upends $6 billion settlement agreement between Purdue Pharma and impacted state, county and tribal governments and residents.
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
U.S. Supreme Court protects key flexibility for county governments responding to homelessness
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case of major significance for counties working to develop comprehensive responses to the homelessness crisis.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow decision in malicious prosecution case
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Chiaverini v. Ohio, a case focused on the relationship between probable cause and malicious prosecution claims against local government.
![police.jpg Image of police.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police.jpg?h=876b03bf&itok=o-AowmqW)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement.
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' legal liability when transferring employees
New test established by the Supreme Court will allow employees demonstrating "some harm" from an unwanted transfer to file a civil rights lawsuit.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
Supreme Court Update: Chiaverini vs. City of Napoleon
The county perspective on a case involving malicious prosecution
![GettyImages-586718274.jpg Image of GettyImages-586718274.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/GettyImages-586718274.jpg?h=cee8c140&itok=aomsMEMd)
Supreme Court Update: Gonzalez v. Trevino
The county perspective on a case involving retaliatory arrests
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
Supreme Court Update: City of Grants Pass v. Gloria Johnson
The county perspective on a case related to the constitutionality of certain local anti-encampment ordinances
![1456277065_smaller](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-02/GettyImages-1456277065_smaller.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=bQTadPGW)
Supreme Court Update: Sheetz v. El Dorado County
The county perspective on a case involving the constitutionality of legislative enacted, generally applicable impact fees for new development
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
Supreme Court Update: Muldrow v. St. Louis
The county perspective in a case concerning discrimination claims in lateral employment transfers
![smart-phones-stock.png Image of smart-phones-stock.png](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/smart-phones-stock.png?h=fea9fe71&itok=5bhtgojP)
Supreme Court Update: Lindke v. Freed/O'Connor Ratcliff v. Garnier
The county perspective on a case related to public officials' use of personal social media accounts
Featured Initiative
Supreme Court Advocacy Hub
![GettyImages-1395752818.jpg Image of GettyImages-1395752818.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/667x579/public/GettyImages-1395752818_0.jpg?h=c5780bb0&itok=8oF3VWbi)