U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Ranking Member introduces legislation to protect ratepayers from costs of data center expansion
Author
Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart
Andrew Nober
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
On August 3, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) introduced the Guarding Ratepayers from Increased Demand-costs (GRID) Savings Act of 2026 (S. 5199). The proposed legislation would create a process for large electricity users to pay for any infrastructure costs associated with increased demand for the electric grid.
The bill comes as federal lawmakers and agencies are considering frameworks to deal with increasing electricity demand driven partly by data centers. Although electricity market regulation is a federal and state responsibility, counties play a role in electricity infrastructure and facility siting.
GRID Savings Act proposals
The GRID Savings Act would give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) rulemaking jurisdiction over large load customers, defined as facilities demanding more than 150 megawatts (MW) of electricity. In June, FERC issued show cause orders to grid operators requiring them to create or justify rules for large load interconnections but has not yet issued a final rulemaking. The GRID Savings Act would require FERC to promulgate a national rule governing the large load interconnection process.
The GRID Savings Act would also assign any costs associated with connecting large loads to the customer rather than being passed onto to ratepayers. Large load interconnections can require the construction of new transmission and distribution infrastructure, which is typically borne by ratepayers. The GRID Savings Act would shift that cost to the customer facility and require guarantees of payment even if the facility closes.
It also allows data centers and other large load customers to voluntarily pay for the construction of new transmission infrastructure in exchange for access to a grid interconnection.
County Impacts
Although counties do not directly regulate electricity markets, they play a role in siting both transmission infrastructure and customer facilities. NACo encourages counties to contact their state utility regulator to discuss how changing grid rules could impact electricity prices and the county role in infrastructure siting.
Other frameworks, such as the Ratepayer Protection Act (H.R. 9340) and President Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge, have proposed similar reforms to accommodate increasing electricity demand growth from large load customers.
Related News
U.S. Department of Energy announces cancellation of National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors
On August 12, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced it would not continue the designation process for three proposed National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETCs). The cancellation means that DOE is not actively considering any NIETCs, which preempt state and county siting authority for energy infrastructure.
U.S. EPA releases guidance for compliance with lead pipe removal requirements
On August 21, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released additional guidance for water systems to comply with the 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LRCI). The guidance comes as water systems face a November 1, 2027, deadline to complete a baseline inventory of water service line materials and begin replacing service lines. The guidance provides further directions on how to assess, identify and access service lines to comply with the rule.
NACo sends letter to Congressional leadership asking them to reauthorize or extend key programs
NACo sends letter to Congressional leadership asking them to prioritize reauthorizing or extending key programs for counties ahead of September deadline
Advocacy
FERC orders regional grid operators to reform rules for large load grid connections
FERC orders regional grid operators to reform rules for large load grid connections