U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Ranking Member introduces legislation to protect ratepayers from costs of data center expansion
Author
Charlotte Mitchell Duyshart
Andrew Nober
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
On August 3, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) introduced the Guarding Ratepayers from Increased Demand-costs (GRID) Savings Act of 2026 (S. 5199). The proposed legislation would create a process for large electricity users to pay for any infrastructure costs associated with increased demand for the electric grid.
The bill comes as federal lawmakers and agencies are considering frameworks to deal with increasing electricity demand driven partly by data centers. Although electricity market regulation is a federal and state responsibility, counties play a role in electricity infrastructure and facility siting.
GRID Savings Act proposals
The GRID Savings Act would give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) rulemaking jurisdiction over large load customers, defined as facilities demanding more than 150 megawatts (MW) of electricity. In June, FERC issued show cause orders to grid operators requiring them to create or justify rules for large load interconnections but has not yet issued a final rulemaking. The GRID Savings Act would require FERC to promulgate a national rule governing the large load interconnection process.
The GRID Savings Act would also assign any costs associated with connecting large loads to the customer rather than being passed onto to ratepayers. Large load interconnections can require the construction of new transmission and distribution infrastructure, which is typically borne by ratepayers. The GRID Savings Act would shift that cost to the customer facility and require guarantees of payment even if the facility closes.
It also allows data centers and other large load customers to voluntarily pay for the construction of new transmission infrastructure in exchange for access to a grid interconnection.
County Impacts
Although counties do not directly regulate electricity markets, they play a role in siting both transmission infrastructure and customer facilities. NACo encourages counties to contact their state utility regulator to discuss how changing grid rules could impact electricity prices and the county role in infrastructure siting.
Other frameworks, such as the Ratepayer Protection Act (H.R. 9340) and President Trump’s Ratepayer Protection Pledge, have proposed similar reforms to accommodate increasing electricity demand growth from large load customers.
Related News
U.S. Senators introduce bipartisan comprehensive permitting reform package with major county wins
On Sep. 30, the leaders of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (S. 5653), a comprehensive, bipartisan permitting reform package that would make major changes to several federal environmental protection statutes.
Foundations navigate community benefit agreements
Philanthropic organizations offer a specialized approach to managing proceeds from community benefit agreements struck between counties and energy companies.
Texas symposium spurs energy talks
The road to domestic energy independence will be paved and maintained by counties, and more than 100 county leaders came to the Texas panhandle to learn how to make the most of the opportunity.
Advocacy
FERC orders regional grid operators to reform rules for large load grid connections
FERC orders regional grid operators to reform rules for large load grid connections