Federal Reforms to Medicaid Financing: What Counties Should Know

Author

Blaire Bryant
Upcoming Events
Related News
Medicaid is a joint federal, state and local program that provides health coverage to low-income individuals, including children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities. The program accounts for over half of all federal funding to states and is the largest source of federal funding in state budgets.
Jump to Section
Medicaid is a joint federal, state and local program that provides health coverage to low-income individuals, including children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities. The program accounts for over half of all federal funding to states and is the largest source of federal funding in state budgets.
Counties play a crucial role in delivering Medicaid services by partnering with federal and state governments to manage local health systems and ensure access to care for vulnerable populations. Any reductions in Medicaid funding directly affect counties' ability to provide public health services, respond to crises and promote economic stability.
On February 20, NACo, in partnership with a coalition of bipartisan membership organizations representing state legislators, state governments, county managers and cities sent a letter to House and Senate leadership expressing concern over proposed changes to Medicaid financing requirements, following recent reconciliation proposals that would enact significant reforms to Medicaid.
This FAQ expands upon that letter, outlining the potential impacts of proposed Medicaid reforms to counties and offers steps county leaders can take to advocate for preserving Medicaid funding.
How do Medicaid reforms impact counties?
Counties are integral to Medicaid administration, funding and service delivery. In 24 states, counties contribute to the non-federal share of Medicaid costs, directly impacting local budgets. Counties also operate over 900 hospitals, 700 nursing homes and 750 behavioral health authorities, and over 1900 local health departments, providing essential healthcare services.
Medicaid covers 38 million children, funds 40 percent of all births and is the largest payer of long-term care and behavioral health services, all critical for county-operated hospitals, nursing homes and social services.
Potential reforms to Medicaid could lead to coverage losses, increased medical debt and higher uncompensated care costs for local providers, threatening access to affordable healthcare and placing a financial strain on county resources.
What potential reforms could be made to Medicaid?
On May 22, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) (H.R. 1). This FY 2025 budget reconciliation bill includes major Medicaid reforms with significant implications for counties, which help finance and administer the program.
While some Medicaid provisions of the OBBBA offer relief from administrative burdens and funding cuts for county health facilities—such as the delay in Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payment cuts until 2029 and the postponement of the federal nursing home staffing rule until 2035—others raise concerns given their potential for cost shifts and administrative burden.
The chart below explains each of these proposals and its impact on counties.
Cost Sharing for the Medicaid Expansion Population
Overview
Enacts cost sharing for individuals in the Medicaid expansion population with incomes between 100 –138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) effective October 1, 2028. Cost sharing rates will be capped at $35 with exemptions for primary, pediatric, and emergency room care as well as mental health and substance use disorder services.
Impact
The provision is likely to increase uncompensated care costs in county-owned health facilities—including, but not limited to, emergency rooms—as low-income families may be unable to afford required cost-sharing for services.
Work or Community Engagement Requirements
Overview
Enacts work or community engagement requirements for able-bodied adults aged 19-64 without dependents with several exemptions by December 31, 2026; however requirements can not be waived or overturned.
Impact
Counties directly administer Medicaid in several states, handling eligibility, enrollment, and renewals. This requires adequate staff, systems, and infrastructure to meet state and federal rules. Federal changes to eligibility could increase administrative burdens, risking delays or requiring more resources. Data also shows that work requirements lead to greater coverage loss, and despite available grants, implementing them could be costly for both states and counties.
Federal Funding Match Reductions for States Providing Services to Immigrant Populations
Overview
Reduces the federal Medicaid match from 90% to 80% for ACA expansion populations in states that offer Medicaid coverage to undocumented immigrants or states that provide coverage to immigrants who were not a qualified alien or otherwise lawfully residing in the United States with exemptions for children and pregnant women.
Impact
Affects at least 14 states and DC that have expanded coverage to undocumented immigrants with their own funds, and will potential shift the cost of care for the expansion population to counties.
New Eligibility and Verification Reporting Requirements
Overview
Adds several new administrative requirements that include monthly address checks beginning in 2029, quarterly death checks for enrollees starting in 2028, monthly provider eligibility and death screenings starting in 2028, and twice-yearly eligibility redeterminations beginning in 2026.
Impact
Enhanced/ increased frequency of Medicaid eligibility verification could significantly increase the administrative burden on these counties—potentially requiring additional staff and resources or risking delays and backlogs in processing applications and claims.
What are the potential consequences of these proposed reforms?
The Congressional Budget Office estimates the proposed Medicaid reforms could result in millions losing coverage, leading to higher medical debt, increased uncompensated care costs and potential hospital closures, especially in rural areas. Specifically, reducing the federal match rate for Medicaid expansion could cut federal spending by $561 billion over nine years, forcing states to either drop expansion or absorb higher costs and jeopardizing coverage for millions.
See state by state impacts below.
Medicaid State-Specific Alternative Names / Nicknames
State | Alternative Name |
Alabama Medicaid | |
DenaliCare | |
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) | |
Health Care | |
Medi-Cal | |
Health First Colorado | |
HuskyHealth, Husky C (for aged, blind or disabled persons) | |
Diamond State Health Plan (Plus) | |
Statewide Medicaid Managed Care Program (SMMC), Managed Medical Assistance (MMA) Program, Long-term Care (LTC) Program | |
Georgia Medicaid | |
MedQuest | |
Idaho Medicaid | |
Hoosier Healthwise, Hoosier Care Connect, M.E.D. Works, Health Indiana Plan (HIP), Traditional Medicaid | |
IA Health Link | |
KanCare Medical Assistance Program | |
Kentucky Medicaid | |
Bayou Health, Healthy Louisiana | |
MaineCare | |
Medical Assistance | |
MassHealth | |
Michigan Medical Assistance Program or MA | |
Minnesota Medical Assistance (MA), MinnesotaCare | |
Mississippi Coordinated Access Network (MississippiCAN) | |
MO HealthNet | |
Montana Medicaid | |
ACCESSNebraska, Nebraska Medical Assistance Program (NMAP) | |
Nevada Medicaid | |
NH Medicaid, New Hampshire Medical Assistance Program | |
NJ FamilyCare | |
Centennial Care; New Mexico Medical Assistance Program | |
New York State Medicaid | |
North Carolina Medicaid | |
North Dakota Medicaid | |
Ohio Medicaid | |
SoonerCare | |
Oregon Health Plan (OHP) | |
Pennsylvania Medical Assistance (MA) Program | |
RI Medical Assistance Program | |
Healthy Connections | |
South Dakota Medicaid | |
TennCare | |
STAR+PLUS; Texas Medicaid | |
Utah Medicaid | |
Green Mountain Care | |
Cardinal Care | |
Apple Health | |
DC Medicaid | |
Health PAS Online; West Virginia Medicaid | |
Forward Health, BadgerCare | |
Equality Care |
How could the FY 2025 budget reconciliation process impact Medicaid and counties?
Both the House and Senate have advanced budget resolutions that could lead to policy changes through the reconciliation process.
U.S. Senate
The Senate budget resolution would authorize roughly $340 billion in spending and be fully offset by corresponding spending cuts. The resolution instructs the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, to reduce spending by $1 billion over 4 years. While specific cuts are uncertain, health-related reductions will likely target the Medicaid program.
U.S. House of Representatives
The House budget resolution requires at least $1.5 trillion in mandatory spending cuts over the next decade, with the Energy and Commerce Committee tasked with reducing spending by $880 billion. These cuts will likely target Medicaid, including potential reductions to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), per-capita caps and work requirements.
Next Steps
The House-passed bill includes substantial federal spending cuts, with Medicaid financing reforms a primary focus for these cuts. The Senate will now take up the legislation, with revisions expected. Because the bill is advancing through reconciliation, it must comply with the so-called Byrd Rule, which bars the inclusion of non-budgetary provisions. The Senate majority may introduce a substitute amendment to overhaul the House bill, while Senate Democrats are expected to challenge provisions they see as violating the Byrd Rule—including those that impact Medicaid. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson has expressed hope that the bill will reach President Trump’s desk by July 4; however, much depends on how the Senate proceeds over the next few weeks.
Dive Deep
Medicaid and Counties: Understanding the Program and Why It Matters to Counties
As Congress considers changes to the nation’s health care system, NACo urges them to consider implications of reforms that would merely shift costs to counties. Learn why the program matters to counties.

Contact

Blaire Bryant
