NACo files comments supporting new Endangered Species Act implementation rules

Image of GettyImages-174874795.jpg

Key Takeaways

On February 5, the National Association of Counties (NACo) submitted comments in response to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) final regulations on interagency cooperation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The regulations were drafted and published in response to a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in U.S. Forest Service v. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center, where the court ruled federal agencies must re-initiate ESA Section 7 consultations for resource or forest management plans when new information related to species listings or critical habitat becomes available.

As intergovernmental partners in wildlife and natural resource management, counties have a particular interest in implementation of environmental statues like the ESA. Federal agencies are required to coordinate management plans with comparable county plans. Counties may provide specific, scientific information to federal land agencies during the development of environmental analyses, as well. State and local governments can further serve as partners implementing final actions, such as infrastructure upkeep and wildlife habitat improvement projects.

When appealing the ruling in 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice wrote that the ruling imposed on the U.S. Forest Service and USFWS “potentially cumbersome procedural measures that both agencies have determined to be unnecessary to achieve compliance with the ESA.”  Counties agree with this statement because forest and resource management plans are designed to serve as broad planning documents to guide federal agencies as they analyze the impacts of specific actions. Management plans generally do not authorize specific actions. They also undergo extensive environmental analyses and legally mandated consultation to ensure compliance with various statutes, including the ESA, before they are finalized. Furthermore, any specific proposed actions on federal lands are always subject to thorough reviews under federal environmental laws.

The USFWS is accepting comments on the ESA interagency cooperation regulations until February 11. The text of the regulation and instructions for how to offer comments can be found here.

Tagged In:

Related News

Supervisor Coe sits at the witness table prior to the hearing
Advocacy

NACo testifies before Congress on national forest partnerships, urges long-term SRS reauthorization

Modoc County, Calif. Supervisor Ned Coe testified before the House Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture on behalf of NACo this week, making the case for stronger federal-county partnerships in national forest management — and urging Congress to act on Secure Rural Schools (SRS) reauthorization before the program lapses at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2026.

Modoc County, Calif. Supervisor Ned Coe prepares to give congressional testimony June 25. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Public lands counties fight for SRS reauthorization

Without mandatory funding, county officials must consistently make the case to Congress for why payments of federal lands a crucial for providing essential services and infrastructure maintenance.

Public Lands Counties
Advocacy

U.S. Department of the Interior announces distribution of $733 million in Payments in Lieu of Taxes

On June 23, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced the payment of $733 million to over 1,900 local governments through the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program. These funds support essential government services in public lands counties nationwide that are home to untaxable federal land.