Counties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Intergovernmental Partnerships
Upcoming Events
Related News
The Recovery Fund and Partnerships
The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which NACo helped to develop and strongly advocated to pass, allocates $65.1 billion. These funds provide direct, flexible aid for every county, parish and borough in America. Counties are on the front lines in delivering this aid to residents and are a driving force connecting communities and strengthening the economy.
As directed by the ARPA and the U.S. Department of Treasury, counties can invest Recovery Funds into a broad range of programs, services and projects under four categories: public sector revenue; public health and economic response; premium pay for essential workers and water, sewer and broadband infrastructure.
Since the enactment of the ARPA, America’s counties have been working hard to develop Recovery Fund implementation plans that will help spur an equitable economic recovery across the nation. As sound financial stewards, counties are investing these critical Recovery Funds to ensure the health and well-being of our nation’s residents and the economic vitality of our local communities. Many counties are in the preliminary stages of development and implementation of Recovery Fund Plans. This report highlights county investments complemented by intergovernmental partnerships to efficiently deliver programs and services, leverage state funding opportunities and support a regional approach to recovery.
Counties Manage Billions in Intergovernmental Revenue
Annually, counties receive $196 billion in intergovernmental revenue including federal, state and local sources. These funds are integral for county operations, services and programs.
Source: NACo Analysis of U.S. Census Bureau - Census of Individual Governments: Finance, 2017
Counties Plan to Invest Recovery Funds to:
Counties are Fostering Intergovernmental Partnerships to Support Key Investments
How will counties invest the funds? NACo analysis of 200 county ARPA Recovery Fund plans reveals county-designed investments in the community across key areas of need. These local priorities are found within county plans at the rate displayed in the chart. Intergovernmental partnerships are unique in that they encompass all topic areas detailed below. The examples in this report further illustrate county allocations to support these integral partnerships across areas of need.
Counties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Rural Communities
This report highlights how counties have begun investing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to support rural communities and residents across the country.
Resource
County Investments of American Rescue Plan Recovery Funds
U.S. Congress passes reconciliation bill: What it means for counties
On July 3, the U.S. Congress passed sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.
County officials voice concern for SNAP, Medicaid amid reconciliation vote
Ahead of the Senate and House's budget reconcilliation votes, county officials from five states traveled to Capitol Hill June 24, to advocate against its provisions related to the social safety net programs.
U.S. Senate passes amended reconciliation bill text: What it means for counties
On July 1, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed their version of sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.
County Countdown – June 30, 2025
Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features the Senate reconciliation debate, transparency on sanctuary designations and more.
Supreme Court’s Trump v. Casa, Inc. ruling limits use of nationwide injunctions: what this means for counties
On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, Inc. limiting federal district court judges' ability to issue universal injunctions to prevent federal policies from going into effect nationwide.
NACo Legal Advocacy: City of Buffalo et al. v. Kia/Hyundai
The question at hand in City of Seattle et al. v. Kia/Hyundai is whether or not the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard preempts state tort claims brought forth by local governments alleging that Kia and Hyundai’s failure to install “reasonable” anti-theft technology constitutes negligence and public nuisance.