Federal Permitting Reform: What County Leaders Need to Know
Upcoming Events
Related News
Federal permitting reform is at the center of the national policy debate—and the outcome will directly affect counties’ ability to deliver infrastructure, housing, energy, water and public safety projects.
This explainer breaks down what federal permitting reform means, why it matters for counties and what’s happening in Washington.
Jump to Section
Federal permitting reform is at the center of the national policy debate—and the outcome will directly affect counties’ ability to deliver infrastructure, housing, energy, water and public safety projects.
This explainer breaks down what federal permitting reform means, why it matters for counties and what’s happening in Washington.
What Is Federal Permitting Reform?
Federal permits are required before many critical projects can move forward, including:
- Roads and bridges
- Water and wastewater systems
- Energy generation and transmission
- Housing and community development projects
- Broadband deployment
These permits are required under laws such as:
- National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
- Clean Water Act
- Clean Air Act
- Endangered Species Act
- National Historic Preservation Act
These laws are designed to protect environmental, cultural and public resources—but the current permitting process often involves multiple agencies, overlapping reviews and unclear timelines, creating delays that stall projects and increase costs.
Why Counties Care about Permitting Reform
For counties, permitting delays due to the lengthy and burdensome federal permitting process mean:
- Higher project costs and budget uncertainty
- Delayed safety improvements on roads, bridges and water systems
- Slower housing development amid affordability shortages
- Lost economic development opportunities
Rural counties are especially affected, as many lack the staffing or technical capacity to navigate complex, multi-year federal reviews.
Where Federal Permitting Reform Stands Today
Efforts in Congress and the Administration are focused on:
- Shortening review timelines
- Improving coordination among federal agencies
- Increasing transparency—without weakening environmental protections
Recent Developments
- In the last Congress, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee advanced the bipartisan Energy Permitting Reform Act, though it did not reach final passage.
- Permitting reform remains a top priority in the 119th Congress, particularly for energy and infrastructure projects.
- The House has passed the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act with bipartisan support.
- NACo successfully secured language explicitly recognizing counties as cooperating agencies in NEPA reviews, strengthening local input in federal decisions.
- The SPEED Act now awaits Senate consideration.
How Counties Fit into the NEPA Process
NEPA establishes a structured federal review process for projects with environmental impacts. Counties play multiple roles throughout this process—as project sponsors, infrastructure owners and cooperating agencies.
NEPA Review Process
- Project Proposed
- Lead Federal Agency Identified
- Cooperating Agencies Invited
Counties provide local data, land use plans and infrastructure expertise- Environmental Review Conducted
Counties coordinate on water, transportation, housing and public safety impacts for environmental assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Assessments (EISs) and any applicable categorical exclusions (CEs)- Public Comment and Interagency Coordination
Counties engage residents and align federal and local requirements- Final Decision Made and Permitting Issued
Counties implement, operate and maintain resulting infrastructure
How Federal Permitting Directly Affects Counties
Energy
Federally permitted energy projects can reshape land use, strain local roads and water systems and override county zoning authority for certain projects. Counties support permitting reform that respects local siting authority and ensures counties are involved early and often.
Water and Wastewater
Counties own and operate drinking water, wastewater and stormwater systems and must comply with Clean Water Act permitting requirements. Changes to federal permitting laws directly affect counties’ ability to maintain and upgrade critical water infrastructure.
Public Lands
In counties with federal land, permitting decisions influence:
- Timber and forest management
- Wildfire mitigation
- Renewable and mineral development
- Recreation and tourism
NEPA’s cooperating agency framework allows counties to share local expertise during federal reviews—an essential tool NACo supports strengthening.
Housing
County-administered Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs like Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) and Continuum of Care (CoC) programs trigger NEPA reviews when used for construction. Any changes to NEPA will directly affect how quickly counties can deliver affordable housing and homelessness services.
Transportation
Lengthy federal reviews delay safety projects and increase costs—especially harmful during inflationary periods. Counties support commonsense reforms, such as expanded NEPA categorical exclusions for projects within existing rights-of-way and safety-focused improvements.
Broadband
Counties manage rights-of-way to ensure safe, coordinated infrastructure deployment. Permitting reform should focus on streamlining federal processes, not preempting state and local authority, which would undermine safe and effective broadband expansion.
What Counties Are Asking For
Counties support permitting reforms that:
- Respect local zoning and land-use authority
- Explicitly include counties as partners in federal reviews
- Reduce unnecessary delays and duplicative reviews
- Maintain strong environmental protections
Key Takeaways for County Leaders
Counties are not obstacles to infrastructure—we are implementers, partners and stewards of our communities.
As Congress and the Administration consider permitting reform, counties need a seat at the table to ensure reforms work on the ground, protect local authority and deliver results for residents.
Resource
Legislative Analysis: What New NEPA Guidelines Mean for Counties
U.S. Representatives introduce bipartisan CERTAIN Act to uphold county participation and streamline federal permitting
On April 15, congressional leaders introduced the bipartisan Create Expedited Reviews to Transform American Infrastructure Now (CERTAIN) Act. Led by Reps. Scott Peters (D-Calif.), Gabe Evans (R-Colo.), Andrew Gabarino (R-N.Y.), Adam Gray (D-Calif.), Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.), Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) and Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), the CERTAIN Act would strengthen county consultation and set actionable deadlines for federal environmental permitting processes.
U.S. Department of Agriculture announces new environmental review regulations
On April 7, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) published a final rule issuing new regulatory guidance for the department’s environmental review processes. The new rule affects how USDA implements the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and affects projects funded by the agency or occurring on land managed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS).
Gulf counties receive more than $92 million in revenue sharing from offshore energy projects
On March 27, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) announced hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue sharing from Gulf energy projects, including more than $92 million which will be distributed directly to 42 coastal counties and parishes and Texas, Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi. The revenue is generated from offshore oil and gas projects on the federally managed Gulf Outer Continental Shelf, and a portion is redirected to states and counties.
White House issues Executive Order addressing barriers to housing construction
White House issues Executive Order addressing barriers to housing construction
Advocacy Hub
Through NACo, advocate for county priorities in federal policy making. Find our latest advocacy toolkits, federal policy analysis and more.