U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
Author
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement. In the case, Ms. Gonzalez asked the Court to reconsider the standard of evidence needed to meet an exception to the rule established in Nieves v. Bartlett that arrests with probable cause do not qualify for retaliatory arrest litigation. She also asked the court to limit the application of Nieves to "split-second" arrests.
- County nexus: The probable-cause rule established by Nieves, provides county governments with important protection against frivolous retaliatory arrest claims, which can lead to costly litigation and have a chilling effect on local law enforcement.
- NACo advocacy: Through the Local Government Legal Center, NACo filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent arguing arguing for a narrow and objective exception under Nieves. The LGLC also advanced the view that Nieves does not apply solely to split-second arrests. Learn more here.
- The Court's ruling: The Court ruled for Ms. Gonzalez in the first question, suggesting that the Fifth Circuit's ruling went too far in demanding virtually identical and identifiable comparators to meet the threshold for the Nieves exception and instead affirming that any form of objective evidence is sufficient. While this decision means that more plaintiffs may be able to bring a retaliatory arrest claim under the Nieves exception by utilizing any form of objective evidence, the Court was careful to emphasize that the Nieves exception is narrow. Additionally, because the Court did not take up the second question, local governments may see future arguments by plaintiffs by plaintiffs that the requirement to plead and prove an absence of probable cause does not apply in non-split-second arrests.
County governments should continue to defend retaliatory arrest claims on the grounds that the exception to Nieves is narrow and requires objective evidence, but law enforcement agencies should carefully review policies and procedures in light of the ruling to guard against increased litigation in these matters.
2024-2025 Supreme Court Term
NACo Legal Advocacy: San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implications for the ability of county governments that own and operate wastewater treatment facilities to comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Lackey v. Stinnie
Lackey v. Stinnie will impact the ability of state and local governments to avoid paying litigation fees in a civil rights case if they change their conduct (i.e. repeal a law) after a court has granted a preliminary injunction.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Garland v. VanDerStok
Garland v. VanDerStok has implications for the ability of county law enforcement to uphold public safety and investigate crimes involving ghost guns.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Stanley v. City of Sanford
Stanley v. City of Sanford will impact the ability of county governments to balance budgets by reducing or eliminating post-employment benefits for disability retirees.
NACo Legal Advocacy: EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera
EMD Sales, Inc. v. Carrera could make it more difficult for county governments to prove exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which would increase the potential for costly litigation.
Featured Initiative
Supreme Court Advocacy Hub
Related News
Report released on 1115 waiver implementation in California
In January 2023, California became the first state to receive federal approval for a Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver to partially amend the Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy.
CMS announces funding to improve the continuity of care for justice-involved individuals
On September 27, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced $106.5 million in state planning grants aimed at improving healthcare continuity for individuals transitioning from incarceration.