Supreme Court Update: Gonzalez v. Trevino
Upcoming Events
Related News
![GettyImages-586718274.jpg Image of GettyImages-586718274.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/807x448/public/GettyImages-586718274.jpg?h=1aac4e55&itok=q07psKV9)
Supreme Court Update: Gonzalez v. Trevino
COUNTY NEXUS
This case has implications for the ease with which private citizens can file frivolous retaliatory arrest claims against county law enforcement, which could lead to costly litigation for cities and counties and a chilling effect on public safety enforcement by county agencies.
BACKGROUND
To limit frivolous retaliatory arrest claims, the Supreme Court set a rule in Nieves: if the government can demonstrate that the law enforcement officer had probable cause to make the arrest, the claim is dismissed. They carved out one exception: if the plaintiff can prove that police officers typically choose not to arrest for this offense. In this case, Ms. Gonzalez' claim that she was arrested in retaliation for protected speech failed in the Fifth Circuit because there was indisputably probable cause in her arrest, which involved the illegal possession of government documents, and she could not provide specific examples of arrests that never happened to meet the Nieves exception. Ms. Gonzalez asked the Supreme Court to reverse the Fifth Circuit’s ruling and decide whether the probable-cause exception in Nieves should be broadened and whether or not Nieves should be limited to "split-second" arrests.
NACo ADVOCACY
In a Local Government Legal Center Amicus Brief in support of the respondent, NACo argued against both expanding the probable-case exception under Nieves and limiting the rule's application to a specific type of arrest, which would result increased liability and litigation costs for counties and could have a chilling effect on arresting officers because of an increase in retaliatory arrest claims.
CURRENT STATUS
On June 20, 2024, the Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in favor of the petitioner on the first question, suggesting that the Fifth Circuit's ruling went too far in demanding virtually identical and identifiable comparators to meet the threshold for the Nieves exception. The Court affirmed that any form of objective evidence is sufficient, and Gonzalez likely met this criteria by offering a survey of the types of crimes typically charged under the statute used in her case. While this decision means that more plaintiffs may be able to bring a retaliatory arrest claim under the Nieves exception by utilizing any form of objective evidence, the Court was careful to emphasize that the Nieves exception is narrow. Additionally, because the Court did not take up the second question, local governments may see future arguments by plaintiffs by plaintiffs that the requirement to plead and prove an absence of probable cause does not apply in non-split-second arrests. Learn more here.
2023-2024 Supreme Court Term
![Fishing boat](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-07/GettyImages-1478187164.jpg?h=80e376df&itok=iidfURh6)
U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Chevron doctrine to reshape the federal administrative state
In major ruling, U.S. Supreme Court overturns longstanding precedent deferring to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous statute.
![Opioid-pills_4.jpg Image of Opioid-pills_4.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Opioid-pills_4_0.jpg?h=d73c3389&itok=_kAR4tLC)
U.S. Supreme Court decision halts Purdue Pharma opioid settlement
Supreme Court ruling upends $6 billion settlement agreement between Purdue Pharma and impacted state, county and tribal governments and residents.
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
U.S. Supreme Court protects key flexibility for county governments responding to homelessness
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case of major significance for counties working to develop comprehensive responses to the homelessness crisis.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow decision in malicious prosecution case
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Chiaverini v. Ohio, a case focused on the relationship between probable cause and malicious prosecution claims against local government.
![police.jpg Image of police.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police.jpg?h=876b03bf&itok=o-AowmqW)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement.
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' legal liability when transferring employees
New test established by the Supreme Court will allow employees demonstrating "some harm" from an unwanted transfer to file a civil rights lawsuit.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
Supreme Court Update: Chiaverini vs. City of Napoleon
The county perspective on a case involving malicious prosecution
![GettyImages-586718274.jpg Image of GettyImages-586718274.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/GettyImages-586718274.jpg?h=cee8c140&itok=aomsMEMd)
Supreme Court Update: Gonzalez v. Trevino
The county perspective on a case involving retaliatory arrests
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
Supreme Court Update: City of Grants Pass v. Gloria Johnson
The county perspective on a case related to the constitutionality of certain local anti-encampment ordinances
![1456277065_smaller](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-02/GettyImages-1456277065_smaller.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=bQTadPGW)
Supreme Court Update: Sheetz v. El Dorado County
The county perspective on a case involving the constitutionality of legislative enacted, generally applicable impact fees for new development
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
Supreme Court Update: Muldrow v. St. Louis
The county perspective in a case concerning discrimination claims in lateral employment transfers
![smart-phones-stock.png Image of smart-phones-stock.png](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/smart-phones-stock.png?h=fea9fe71&itok=5bhtgojP)
Supreme Court Update: Lindke v. Freed/O'Connor Ratcliff v. Garnier
The county perspective on a case related to public officials' use of personal social media accounts
Featured Initiative
Supreme Court Advocacy Hub
![GettyImages-1395752818.jpg Image of GettyImages-1395752818.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/667x579/public/GettyImages-1395752818_0.jpg?h=c5780bb0&itok=8oF3VWbi)
Advocacy
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement.
![police.jpg Image of police.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/667x579/public/police.jpg?h=73425693&itok=1ZWVcbKb)