Next step on PILT requires more outreach
Key Takeaways
Counties have long sought permanent funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program, so Rep. Celeste Maloy’s (R-Utah) assessment could have had a chilling effect.
She has been on both sides of the deal, first as a county attorney for Washington County, Utah and then as a lawyer for the Utah Association of Counties before being elected to the House of Representatives in 2023.
“As much as I would like to see that happen, I think we’re in the wrong political climate for that right now because we’re trying to make everything not permanent right now,” she told the NACo Public Lands Policy Steering Committee Feb. 21. “Mandatory spending is what we’re trying to cut back.”
But she didn’t rule it out.
PILT compensates counties for the nontaxable federal land in their boundaries for which they provide services, and the Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program pays counties in lieu of timber receipts. Nearly three-quarters of counties contain federal public land, which accounts for more than a quarter of U.S. land. The 2025 PILT payments, which are discretionary spending, totaled $644.8 million.
“It’s easy to forget about PILT and SRS unless your county elected officials are blowing you up all the time on it,” Maloy said. “Go talk to people you don’t know, go tell your stories. I can tell you, sitting in office now, it is really hard to ignore people who show up and tell you their experience with something we’re doing and how it impacts their constituents.”
She noted that many of her congressional colleagues don’t often hear from their county leaders, suggesting that some members of Congress are low-hanging fruit in the effort.
“If your own representative isn’t listening, call another one nearby, because our Western issues aren’t that different,” she said. “If you are in a blue Western state and you’re looking at red issues, call someone across the border because what we need is good information.
“It would really be easy for me and my staff to sit in our ivory tower and think we have all the right answers and then we can come up with all the good ideas. And we will get it wrong if we're not hearing from people who are on the ground and applying it.”
Related News
LASSO Act preserves county revenue sharing, directs public lands funds to Social Security
On February 10, the U.S., House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Federal Lands held a hearing examining the Land and Social Security Optimization (LASSO) Act (H.R. 34), which would direct a portion of revenues generated on public lands to fund the Social Security system. Introduced by Rep. Paul Gosar, D.D.S. (R-Ariz.), this measure would protect federal revenue sharing to counties while encouraging active use of public lands.
U.S. Department of the Interior issues new NEPA regulations recognizing local governments as cooperating agencies
On February 23, the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) announced a final rule updating the Department’s regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; P.L. 91-190). In a step forward for counties, the final rule reinstates provisions that name local government agencies as cooperating agencies during the NEPA environmental review process.
House Agriculture Committee advances 2026 Farm Bill
On March 5, the House Agriculture Committee voted to advance its version of the 2026 Farm Bill.
County News
PILT is no four-letter word for counties