HHS Freezes Funding in Five States Pending Review of Fraud Concerns

Author

Image of Julia Cortina.jpg

Julia Cortina

Associate Legislative Director, Human Services & Education | Immigration Advisory Council
Kevin Moore

Kevin Moore

Legislative Assistant

Upcoming Events

Related News

Advocacy

County Countdown – Dec. 15, 2025

-

Key Takeaways

On January 6, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Administration for Children and Families (ACF) sent letters to Calif., Colo., Ill., Minn. and N.Y. announcing they are temporarily restricting access to select federal child care and family assistance grant funds while the agency conducts a program integrity review.

According to ACF, the temporary restriction will impact nearly $2.4 billion of Child Care and Development (CCDF) funds, $7.35 billion of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds and $869 million of Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) funds. In Colo., Minn. and N.Y., all three of these programs are directly administered by counties. In Calif., counties are responsible for administering TANF. In the letters, ACF raised concerns that eligibility verification practices in some states may need additional review to ensure alignment with federal law. In a separate communication, ACF stated that they have activated the Defend the Spend system to review funds for all CCDF grantees.

What does this mean for counties?

Counties are the frontline providers of human services and critical social support services. In three of the affected states, county governments directly administer CCDF and SSBG and administer TANF in four. In these states, counties are responsible for functions such as eligibility determination, service delivery, enrollment, data reporting and management of provider networks. 

The temporary funding freeze has the potential to create significant operational strain on the delivery of child care and family assistance services. Counties rely on timely federal reimbursement to support eligibility staff, provider payments, case management, and the coordinated delivery of wraparound services that stabilize families and strengthen local economies. NACo is concerned that prolonged payment restrictions could disrupt services for eligible families and increase administrative burdens and errors on county human services systems. 

These measures will remain in place until ACF completes its review and NACo will continue to monitor federal guidance. 
 

Tagged In:

Related News

County Countdown
Advocacy

County Countdown – Dec. 15, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership.

Abby Winiker, director of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Overdose Prevention Initiative, highlights ways to stretch opioid dollars. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Stretching small opioid settlement allocations helps funding do more

States and localities are set to receive $56 billion in opioid settlement dollars over an 18-year period, but not every county that receives settlement funding will get enough to build out infrastructure.