Urge your Members of Congress, particularly those who serve on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee, to support full funding for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Social Services Block Grant (SSBG).
SSBG was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 (P.L. 97-35) and is administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Administration for Children and Families (ACF). The program is a capped entitlement to states, and Congress must therefore appropriate SSBG funds each year. Since 2001, Congress has authorized SSBG at $1.7 billion yearly.
Ten states pass SSBG funds directly to counties: Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin, though counties in other states can access SSBG funds as well. According to a NACo analysis of Federal Audit Clearinghouse data, counties used over $763 million in SSBG funds between Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 and FY 2016.
SSBG funds support nearly 30 different types of services. Given that counties are responsible for providing a wide variety of human services, SSBG funding’s flexibility is critical. In FY 2016, the last year for which data is available, 26 million individuals received services supported in whole or in part by SSBG, 41 percent of whom were children. The highest SSBG spending goes toward for child welfare and child protective services, general support services, and adult protective services which prevent and remedy abuse, neglect and exploitation of the elderly and disabled adults.
SSBG funding for adult protective services is especially useful for counties. Roughly 11 percent of individuals over the age of 60 are thought to suffer from some form of abuse, including financial. Counties are typically responsible for adult protective services but lack adequate federal support for these activities—the Elder Justice Act has received less than 10 percent of authorized funding levels since its 2010 enactment under the Affordable Care Act, for instance. SSBG funding is crucial for filling that gap to support elder justice programs and activities, and in FY 2016, 10 percent ($285 million) of total SSBG expenditures went toward these services. Meanwhile, as the rate of children in foster care as a result of parental substance abuse continues to grow, SSBG funds are especially valuable for supplementing other federal child welfare dollars. In 12 states, counties are partially or fully responsible for operating the child welfare system to provide child protective services and foster care to neglected and abused children. In FY 2016, the highest share—33 percent—of SSBG expenditures went toward child welfare services, totaling nearly $400 million.
Although SSBG helps our nation’s most vulnerable populations, the program remains under threat for funding cuts. Since FY 2014, SSBG has been subject to sequestration—a spending reduction process by which budgetary resources are canceled to enforce budget policy goals—and therefore received a roughly 7 percent cut each fiscal year. As a result, the number of individuals benefiting from SSBG funding has declined. Between FY 2014 and FY 2016, reported recipients decreased by almost 4.4 million (15 percent) across all SSBG service areas. Meanwhile, the White House budget requests eliminating the block grant in previous budget proposals, including for FY 2020. The block grant is and will remain extremely vulnerable in the context of entitlement reform and deficit reduction efforts.
KEY TALKING POINTS:
The Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) provides funds to states for activities that serve vulnerable populations, including adults and children at risk of abuse and neglect. Ten states – Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin – pass these funds directly to counties.
Counties across the country reported utilizing over $763 million in SSBG funds between FY 2014 and FY 2016.
SSBG is the main source of federal funds for adult protective services, which are often a county responsibility. SSBG funding is critical to these efforts due to historic lack of funding for other federal elder abuse prevention programs.
In 12 states, counties are fully or partially responsible for fulfilling the federal mandate to provide child protective services and foster care to neglected and abused children. SSBG funds can support foster care placements for children who are otherwise ineligible for the federal foster care program.
SSBG has received automatic cuts annually since FY 2014, corresponding with a 15 percent decline in individuals benefiting from the program in FY 2016.
For further information, contact Rachel Merker at 202.661.8843 or firstname.lastname@example.org.