Congress examines reforms to endangered species management
Author
Zeke Lee
Andrew Nober
Upcoming Events
Related News
Key Takeaways
On Mar. 18, the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Work held a hearing examining how to improve implementation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The hearing follows several legislative proposals to reform endangered species management that recently advanced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
At the hearing, senators expressed an interest in solutions that would improve the species recovery process. They pointed out that, although the ESA protections are highly effective at preventing species’ extinction, species rarely experience successful recovery and delisting. As key partners in wildlife stewardship with the federal government, counties support the goals of the ESA and support reforms that outline clear recovery targets and delisting criteria for endangered and threatened species.
Reform efforts in the U.S. House
The Senate hearing comes amid ongoing efforts to reform the ESA and advance species-specific management legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives. On Dec. 18, the House passed the Pet and Livestock Protection Act (H.R. 845). Led by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), the measure would delist the grey wolf from the endangered species list.
On Dec. 17, the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources advanced the ESA Amendments Act of 2025 (H.R. 1897), which would reform the ESA to expedite the delisting process and expand what data can be used in management decisions, among other proposed changes.
Impact on Counties
As environmental co-stewards with the federal government, counties work to further endangered species recovery goals and manage the impacts of habitat and take protections on communities. Given the significant impact a species’ designation can have on local communities, counties support clear, targeted recovery goals for endangered and threatened species that encourage successful recovery.
As part of the National Endangered Species Act Reform Coalition (NESARC), NACo continues to monitor ESA reform efforts.
Related News
U.S. Forest Service begins revision process for regulations on road and trail closure in National Forests
On August 21, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) announced it is moving forward with plans to revise the 2005 Travel Management Rule, which regulates how USFS plans which roads and trails are open to the public. Revising the Travel Management Rule is an important step that will increase public access to National Forests and help connect forest communities. As part of the rulemaking process, USFS is seeking public comment on its proposed revisions. Counties have until September 23 to submit comments on the agency’s initial action.
U.S. Forest Service seeks comment on proposal to rescind 2001 Roadless Rule in National Forests
Roadless Rule
On August 20, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) published a notice of proposed rulemaking to rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. The rule prohibits road construction, reconstruction and most timber management on almost 45 million acres of National Forest land, and its repeal would give federal forest managers significant flexibility to manage forests in accordance with local need.
U.S. Forest Service reopens Resource Advisory Committee nomination process
On August 13, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) announced it was reopening the nomination process for Resource Advisory Committee (RACs) that direct certain funding from the Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program. County elected officials are eligible and encouraged to apply to serve on a RAC by November 12, 2026.
Advocacy
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces it will not develop a recovery plan for the gray wolf
On November 3, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced it would not develop a national recovery plan for the gray wolf, which is currently considered endangered under the Endangered Species Act in much of the contiguous United States. The Service’s assessment, which determines that a nationwide recovery plan is no longer necessary for gray wolves, is consistent with previous federal agency findings that the species no longer warrant endangered or threatened species protection.
