Biden administration ends implementation of the 'public charge' rule

Author

Eryn Hurley

Eryn Hurley

Managing Director, Government Affairs & NACo Federal Fellowship Initiative
Image of Seamus-Dowdall.jpg

Seamus Dowdall

Legislative Director, Telecommunications & Technology

Upcoming Events

Related News

Advocacy

County Countdown – June 30, 2025

Image of GettyImages-979963456.jpg

Key Takeaways

On March 9, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced in a press release that the agency would no longer seek to implement the 2019 “public charge” rule, a policy that significantly expanded the criteria immigration officials use to determine whether an individual seeking immigration status is likely to become dependent on the federal government. The announcement is the latest action by the Biden Administration that aims to reverse and address immigration policies enacted by the previous administration, and the action falls in line with initiatives first outlined in a series of Executive Orders released last month.

The “public charge” rule, originally finalized and implemented in December of 2019 under the Trump Administration, sought to broaden the scope of public benefit services that federal immigration services can consider when determining whether an immigrant is likely to become primarily dependent on the federal government for subsistence. NACo submitted public comments during formulation of the rule that stated the policy’s implementation may deter immigrants from accessing federal benefits for which they are legally eligible and subsequently increase reliance on local services. Additionally, counties expressed concern that the rule may increase compliance and administrative costs for counties that operate federal benefits programs, as well as potentially discourage residents, including children, from seeking assistance programs that would help mitigate the spread and economic impacts of COVID-19. A complete NACo analysis of the rule’s impact on counties can be found here.

The announcement comes at a time when counties are continuing to play a central role in ensuring the health and safety of all individuals, including immigrant populations. As counties continue this fight against the COVID-19 pandemic on the front lines, the rule will allow us to devote our full attention and resources to front-line providers of public health and safety as well as continuing to administer critical federal assistance to all eligible individuals.

Tagged In:

Related News

Image of Capitol-panorama_2.jpg
Advocacy

U.S. Senate passes amended reconciliation bill text: What it means for counties

On July 1, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed their version of sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – June 30, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features the Senate reconciliation debate, transparency on sanctuary designations and more.

Image of supreme court.jpg
Advocacy

Supreme Court’s Trump v. Casa, Inc. ruling limits use of nationwide injunctions: what this means for counties

On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, Inc. limiting federal district court judges' ability to issue universal injunctions to prevent federal policies from going into effect nationwide.