Shutdown delays public hearing, webcast on new WOTUS rule
Upcoming Events
Related News

Key Takeaways
The federal government shutdown has delayed outreach related to the new proposed definition of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) released a new proposed WOTUS definition Dec. 11 to replace the 2015 rule issued under the Obama Administration. The agencies scheduled a Jan. 10 webcast and a Jan. 23 public hearing in Wyandotte County, Kan. (Kansas City). The lapse in appropriations for EPA led the the outreach events' postponement, and the rule's publication in the Federal Register has also been postponed.
Learn More
Revised Definition of "Waters of the United States" - Proposed Rule
The agencies will take public comment on the proposal for 60 days following its publication in the Register.
The announcement came a little over a year after President Trump signed an executive order directing the EPA to withdraw and rewrite the controversial 2015 rule. EPA will accept public comments for 60 days once the definition is officially published in the Federal Register.
The new proposed definition creates six categories of regulated waters and includes 11 exemptions. The six categories of WOTUS include:
- traditional navigable waters
- tributaries
- certain ditches
- certain lakes and ponds
- impoundments
- adjacent wetlands
The proposed rule specifies that if water does not meet one of the six listed categories, it will not be considered a WOTUS and clarifies that certain other waters will also no longer be considered a WOTUS such as ditches, features that are only wet during rainfall events, groundwater, stormwater control features, wastewater recycling infrastructure built in uplands, converted cropland and waste treatment systems.
NACo is currently in the process of developing a comprehensive analysis of the new proposed definition.

Attachments
Related News

U.S. Supreme Court issues unanimous decision in landmark National Environmental Policy Act case
On May 29, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado that will reshape requirements for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environment impact statements.
Interest in energy generation builds in the West
Counties are exploring the potential for energy generation on their public lands, but local control will set the stage for a tradeoff.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announces actions to combat PFAS contamination
On April 28, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a new suite of upcoming actions to address contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These measures, outlined by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, aim to strengthen scientific understanding, enhance enforcement and build partnerships with impacted communities, including counties and other local governments.