Pretrial population and costs put county jails at a crossroads

Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
County NewsGrowing pretrial populations in jails and their accompanying costs are stressing counties,Pretrial population and costs put county jails at a crossroadsJune 29, 2015June 29, 2015, 6:30 pm
-
County News Article
Pretrial population and costs put county jails at a crossroads
Counties own 87 percent of all local jail facilities in the United States — many of them overcrowded — yet they have very little say in determining who is detained and how long they stay.
Sixty-seven percent of the population in county jails is pretrial, detainees who have been charged with committing a crime not yet adjudicated, according to a new NACo research report, County Jails at a Crossroads: An Examination of the Jail Population and Pretrial Release. In some counties, it’s as high as 75 percent.
The research is based on a survey of more than 1,300 county jails conducted between March and April 2015 with the support of the American Jail Association. It examines the pretrial population in county jails and their role in pretrial release and supervision.
Jail costs and populations are inherently related, and 44 percent of responding county jails reported that lowering jail costs is currently one of their top priorities. However, the courts determine who is eligible for pre-trial release, limiting county jails and County Boards in their ability to lower costs and reduce jail populations.
Many county jails use a risk assessment when admitting or booking someone into jail following arrest, which allows them to evaluate the person’s likelihood of committing a new offense and jeopardizing community safety.
Low-risk inmates could be released pending trial, easing jail overcrowding and thereby reducing the cost of detention to counties. Forty-two percent of county jails responding to the NACo survey operate at, above or near capacity. When a jail is approaching its capacity, it loses flexibility in terms of both space and personnel to accommodate even small increases in population.
County jails are doing what they can to manage the pretrial population. Community-based supervision programs allow jails to shift supervision and custody to the community. Thirty-two percent of responding county jails have a program that releases pretrial detainees from custody and supervises them in the community.
In addition to pretrial supervision programs, detainees who have been charged but not yet faced trial, may also be eligible for community-based supervision through electronic monitoring, home arrest and work-release programs — as well as behavioral health treatment and physical health care treatment.
However, county jails are limited in their capacity to make use of these programs. Despite the prevalence of community supervision programs in county jails, in most cases a judge authorizes the jail to place pretrial detainees into programs that result in release from confinement and placement in community supervision. Because jails primarily derive pretrial release authority from the courts, the judicial system maintains a key role in the ability of jails to manage not only the pretrial population in jail, but also the total jail population.
Without effective population management in collaboration with the court, jails may continue to feel pressure on jail capacity and difficulty controlling corrections costs.
From elected leaders to philanthropists, there is an increasing focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of county justice systems, including reducing the county jail population and rethinking the bail system that guides whether someone arrested can be released from jail while their case moves through the court system. These two issues in county justice systems are connected because of the large pretrial population in county jails. The purpose of bail is to ensure that a defendant will appear for court and to protect public safety.
The current bail system in most counties primarily uses bail schedules or financial conditions that guide pretrial release decisions by setting a dollar amount based on the charge against the defendant. Thus, defendants with the money to make bail can fund their release from jail while those defendants without funds remain in jail.
The dynamic between courts and jails during pretrial is central to understanding the prevailing population and cost trends within county jails. Assessing the impact of current pretrial release policies and decision making on the county justice system will continue to position counties in leading the way in pretrial justice.
Growing pretrial populations in jails and their accompanying costs are stressing counties,2015-06-29County News Article2023-04-11
Counties own 87 percent of all local jail facilities in the United States — many of them overcrowded — yet they have very little say in determining who is detained and how long they stay.
Sixty-seven percent of the population in county jails is pretrial, detainees who have been charged with committing a crime not yet adjudicated, according to a new NACo research report, County Jails at a Crossroads: An Examination of the Jail Population and Pretrial Release. In some counties, it’s as high as 75 percent.
The research is based on a survey of more than 1,300 county jails conducted between March and April 2015 with the support of the American Jail Association. It examines the pretrial population in county jails and their role in pretrial release and supervision.
Jail costs and populations are inherently related, and 44 percent of responding county jails reported that lowering jail costs is currently one of their top priorities. However, the courts determine who is eligible for pre-trial release, limiting county jails and County Boards in their ability to lower costs and reduce jail populations.
Many county jails use a risk assessment when admitting or booking someone into jail following arrest, which allows them to evaluate the person’s likelihood of committing a new offense and jeopardizing community safety.
Low-risk inmates could be released pending trial, easing jail overcrowding and thereby reducing the cost of detention to counties. Forty-two percent of county jails responding to the NACo survey operate at, above or near capacity. When a jail is approaching its capacity, it loses flexibility in terms of both space and personnel to accommodate even small increases in population.
County jails are doing what they can to manage the pretrial population. Community-based supervision programs allow jails to shift supervision and custody to the community. Thirty-two percent of responding county jails have a program that releases pretrial detainees from custody and supervises them in the community.
In addition to pretrial supervision programs, detainees who have been charged but not yet faced trial, may also be eligible for community-based supervision through electronic monitoring, home arrest and work-release programs — as well as behavioral health treatment and physical health care treatment.
However, county jails are limited in their capacity to make use of these programs. Despite the prevalence of community supervision programs in county jails, in most cases a judge authorizes the jail to place pretrial detainees into programs that result in release from confinement and placement in community supervision. Because jails primarily derive pretrial release authority from the courts, the judicial system maintains a key role in the ability of jails to manage not only the pretrial population in jail, but also the total jail population.
Without effective population management in collaboration with the court, jails may continue to feel pressure on jail capacity and difficulty controlling corrections costs.
From elected leaders to philanthropists, there is an increasing focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of county justice systems, including reducing the county jail population and rethinking the bail system that guides whether someone arrested can be released from jail while their case moves through the court system. These two issues in county justice systems are connected because of the large pretrial population in county jails. The purpose of bail is to ensure that a defendant will appear for court and to protect public safety.
The current bail system in most counties primarily uses bail schedules or financial conditions that guide pretrial release decisions by setting a dollar amount based on the charge against the defendant. Thus, defendants with the money to make bail can fund their release from jail while those defendants without funds remain in jail.
The dynamic between courts and jails during pretrial is central to understanding the prevailing population and cost trends within county jails. Assessing the impact of current pretrial release policies and decision making on the county justice system will continue to position counties in leading the way in pretrial justice.
Hero 1
-
Blog
Bipartisan, bicameral legislation introduced to reauthorize and reform the National Flood Insurance Program
On June 22, Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.), and Representatives Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Clay Higgins (R-La.), introduced the bipartisan, National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2023. -
County Profiles
Opioid Solutions Center: Counties in Action
Learn how counties are demonstrating leadership and commitment to delivering effective abatement activities at the local level. -
County News
Counties offer stability for victims of community violence
Counties are investing in supportive services for community violence survivors through hospital-based violence intervention programs. -
County News
County reshapes justice system for women battling mental health issues
Problem: Too many women who needed mental health support were being incarcerated and left untreated. Solution: -
Blog
FEMA requests feedback from counties on the BRIC non-financial Direct Technical Assistance program
On May 23, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published a Request for Information (RFI) to solicit feedback on the capabilities of organizations that help FEMA deliver the
Related Resources
-
County News
County library teams up with jail to offer resources to incarcerated individuals
The Salt Lake County Library teamed up with the county jail to educate inmates on how to navigate the library, including using employment resources. -
Blog
The County Countdown – July 24, 2023
Every other week, NACo’s County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. -
Blog
Community Mental Health Services May Support Reducing Jail Populations
The Stepping Up Initiative — supported by NACo, the American Psychiatric Association Foundation and the Council of State Governments Justice Center — assists county government efforts to reduce the prevalence of individuals with mental health conditions in the criminal legal system.
-
Reports & Toolkits
Planning Principles Toolkit
Tools, templates and strategic guidance for maximizing the impact of opioid settlement funds on your community’s opioid abatement priorities. -
Reports & Toolkits
Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy (MIEP) Advocacy Toolkit
The Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy (MIEP), which denies or revokes federal health and other benefits, is a violation of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, respectively. This policy also places undue financial and administrative burdens on local jails and produces unfavorable health outcomes for individuals and communities. By contrast, the uninterrupted provision of health care helps our residents break the cycle of recidivism exacerbated by untreated physical and mental illnesses and substance use disorders. -
County Profiles
Opioid Solutions Center: Counties in Action
Learn how counties are demonstrating leadership and commitment to delivering effective abatement activities at the local level.
More From
-
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023
This analysis includes funding highlights for key programs impacting counties.
Learn More