
Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
County NewsThis January marks the 23rd anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada. This signature achievement of President Bill Clinton’s first term passed the House (234 –200) and the Senate (61–38).NAFTA Remains a Key Economic PillarNovember 28, 2016November 28, 2016, 3:00 pm
-
County News Article
NAFTA Remains a Key Economic Pillar
This January marks the 23rd anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada. This signature achievement of President Bill Clinton’s first term passed the House (234 –200) and the Senate (61–38). Particularly in the House, support did not fall along partisan lines, as 102 Democrats joined 132 Republicans to enact NAFTA. Neither did the opposition, as 43 Republicans joined 156 Democrats in opposing implementation.
The incoming president of the United States has called NAFTA the “worst trade deal in history” and threatens to “terminate” the agreement. With this in mind, let’s review what NAFTA actually encompasses and some contextualization of the economic effects.
Key components of NAFTA involve intellectual property, investments and services restrictions and trade in goods.
Intellectual Property
NAFTA protects intellectual property rights in many ways. This class of property encompasses trademarks, patents, recordings and written works. Without these protections, investment in research and development of new technologies and pharmaceuticals, engineering designs, advertising and entertainment productions would be discouraged. The ability of another entity to unfairly benefit from the extensive up-front costs of developing these goods and services for mass production would stifle economic progress.
NAFTA guarantees that each signatory, at the minimum, enforce certain codified international norms regarding the protection of intellectual property. Furthermore, any protection must apply equally to both domestic and foreign firms. This provision fosters investment, which benefits the entire trading block through enhanced quality of life and productivity.
Investments and Services
NAFTA enables capital to flow more freely to investment opportunities within the three countries, including both the provision of goods and services. A key part of the agreement ensures that each government “shall accord to investments of investors of another Party treatment no less favorable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to investments of its own investors…”
NAFTA also precludes any signatory from requiring a certain level of domestic ownership of a foreign company operating within its territory. These guarantees spur investment by alleviating concerns of state seizure or discriminatory treatment in favor of domestic firms. Such fears are not unwarranted even across the Western Hemisphere, as evidenced by the take-over of Kimberly-Clark Corp.’s facilities by the socialist regime in Venezuela.
Trade in Goods
NAFTA required a progressive elimination of tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are fees levied on imports with the dual purpose of raising revenue for the state and also making domestically manufactured goods more cost-competitive. In addition, the agreement also eliminated most prohibitions and restrictions on goods importations between the three counties. These measures broadened market access for companies operating within the trading block.
Doubts and concerns regarding the efficacy of NAFTA have grown, especially as manufacturing jobs remain stuck near post-World War II lows. Manufacturing jobs peaked at more than 19.5 million in 1979. Following a decades-long stagnation, this sector began to plunge in earnest during the recession of 2001, bottoming out at under 11.5 million in 2010 in the wake of the Great Recession. Over the past six years, the sector has rebounded by fewer than 1 million jobs.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, however, estimates that 5 million U.S. jobs were created during the first 20 years of NAFTA, thanks to the increase in trade from NAFTA. As an example, agricultural exports to Canada tripled, and those exports to Mexico quadrupled. In addition, service exports to Canada and Mexico leapt from $27 billion to $82 billion within this same 20-year period.
The decline in manufacturing jobs since 1979 contrasted with the corresponding rise in service-sector jobs provides a compelling illustration of why manufacturing jobs should not be the only statistic used to determine the success of a policy. Even as manufacturing jobs declined by more than 7 million, service sector employment grew by more than 60 million. A dramatic economic shift to service provision occurred.
Service vs Manufacturing
Although many place the loss of manufacturing jobs on international trade, such an assignment of blame may be misplaced. Other facts are largely ignored. For instance, increased productivity means more output per each labor unit of input; in other words, more goods can be produced with fewer total employees. Also, more stringent labor and environmental regulations domestically can add to the costs of producing goods at home.
In addition, a trade imbalance of imports exceeding exports is not necessarily a negative for the economy. Remember, these imports of foreign products are purchased with U.S. dollars. Ultimately, these dollars are either used by our foreign trading partners to purchase U.S. goods or they return to U.S. shores in the form of investments here at home. In fact, high real GDP and employment growth are correlated positively with a growth in the trade deficit.
Consumers may perhaps be the biggest recipients of the benefits of free trade in general and NAFTA in particular. Since implementation of NAFTA, durable goods prices have dropped by nearly 14 percent even as inflation overall has totaled more than 65 percent.
Inflation
Billions continue to be lifted out of poverty across the globe thanks to the spread of capitalism, private property rights and the rule of law. Access to newly-empowered consumers across the globe along with rapidly expanding labor pools for goods production present both threats and opportunities for the U.S. economy. An understanding by the general public of how loosened restrictions on the flow of capital, goods and services can impact on a micro and macro level will empower policy makers in their effort to create an environment even more conducive of economic growth.
This January marks the 23rd anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada.2016-11-28County News Article2023-04-11
This January marks the 23rd anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada. This signature achievement of President Bill Clinton’s first term passed the House (234 –200) and the Senate (61–38). Particularly in the House, support did not fall along partisan lines, as 102 Democrats joined 132 Republicans to enact NAFTA. Neither did the opposition, as 43 Republicans joined 156 Democrats in opposing implementation.
The incoming president of the United States has called NAFTA the “worst trade deal in history” and threatens to “terminate” the agreement. With this in mind, let’s review what NAFTA actually encompasses and some contextualization of the economic effects.
Key components of NAFTA involve intellectual property, investments and services restrictions and trade in goods.
Intellectual Property
NAFTA protects intellectual property rights in many ways. This class of property encompasses trademarks, patents, recordings and written works. Without these protections, investment in research and development of new technologies and pharmaceuticals, engineering designs, advertising and entertainment productions would be discouraged. The ability of another entity to unfairly benefit from the extensive up-front costs of developing these goods and services for mass production would stifle economic progress.
NAFTA guarantees that each signatory, at the minimum, enforce certain codified international norms regarding the protection of intellectual property. Furthermore, any protection must apply equally to both domestic and foreign firms. This provision fosters investment, which benefits the entire trading block through enhanced quality of life and productivity.
Investments and Services
NAFTA enables capital to flow more freely to investment opportunities within the three countries, including both the provision of goods and services. A key part of the agreement ensures that each government “shall accord to investments of investors of another Party treatment no less favorable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to investments of its own investors…”
NAFTA also precludes any signatory from requiring a certain level of domestic ownership of a foreign company operating within its territory. These guarantees spur investment by alleviating concerns of state seizure or discriminatory treatment in favor of domestic firms. Such fears are not unwarranted even across the Western Hemisphere, as evidenced by the take-over of Kimberly-Clark Corp.’s facilities by the socialist regime in Venezuela.
Trade in Goods
NAFTA required a progressive elimination of tariffs on imported goods. Tariffs are fees levied on imports with the dual purpose of raising revenue for the state and also making domestically manufactured goods more cost-competitive. In addition, the agreement also eliminated most prohibitions and restrictions on goods importations between the three counties. These measures broadened market access for companies operating within the trading block.
Doubts and concerns regarding the efficacy of NAFTA have grown, especially as manufacturing jobs remain stuck near post-World War II lows. Manufacturing jobs peaked at more than 19.5 million in 1979. Following a decades-long stagnation, this sector began to plunge in earnest during the recession of 2001, bottoming out at under 11.5 million in 2010 in the wake of the Great Recession. Over the past six years, the sector has rebounded by fewer than 1 million jobs.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, however, estimates that 5 million U.S. jobs were created during the first 20 years of NAFTA, thanks to the increase in trade from NAFTA. As an example, agricultural exports to Canada tripled, and those exports to Mexico quadrupled. In addition, service exports to Canada and Mexico leapt from $27 billion to $82 billion within this same 20-year period.
The decline in manufacturing jobs since 1979 contrasted with the corresponding rise in service-sector jobs provides a compelling illustration of why manufacturing jobs should not be the only statistic used to determine the success of a policy. Even as manufacturing jobs declined by more than 7 million, service sector employment grew by more than 60 million. A dramatic economic shift to service provision occurred.
Service vs Manufacturing
Although many place the loss of manufacturing jobs on international trade, such an assignment of blame may be misplaced. Other facts are largely ignored. For instance, increased productivity means more output per each labor unit of input; in other words, more goods can be produced with fewer total employees. Also, more stringent labor and environmental regulations domestically can add to the costs of producing goods at home.
In addition, a trade imbalance of imports exceeding exports is not necessarily a negative for the economy. Remember, these imports of foreign products are purchased with U.S. dollars. Ultimately, these dollars are either used by our foreign trading partners to purchase U.S. goods or they return to U.S. shores in the form of investments here at home. In fact, high real GDP and employment growth are correlated positively with a growth in the trade deficit.
Consumers may perhaps be the biggest recipients of the benefits of free trade in general and NAFTA in particular. Since implementation of NAFTA, durable goods prices have dropped by nearly 14 percent even as inflation overall has totaled more than 65 percent.
Inflation
Billions continue to be lifted out of poverty across the globe thanks to the spread of capitalism, private property rights and the rule of law. Access to newly-empowered consumers across the globe along with rapidly expanding labor pools for goods production present both threats and opportunities for the U.S. economy. An understanding by the general public of how loosened restrictions on the flow of capital, goods and services can impact on a micro and macro level will empower policy makers in their effort to create an environment even more conducive of economic growth.
Hero 1
About Joel Griffith (Full Bio)
Deputy Research Director
Joel Griffith is NACo’s Deputy Research Director. He is responsible for managing the research team and the operations of the department along with acting as lead researcher for certain NACo research projects.More from Joel Griffith
-
Webinar
NACo Briefing for Newly Elected Congressional Staff on Counties & the Federal Grant Process
Jun. 8, 2023 , 3:00 pm – 4:00 pmOver the past two years, new federal laws have led to a significant increase in funding becoming available directly to counties. As a result, it is crucial for communities to understand how to navigate these opportunities and maximize these funding streams. -
Webinar
Worried about inflation? Strategies for Increasing Non-Tax Revenues.
Jun. 8, 2023 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pmHosted by Joe Rulison, CEO, and William (Bill) Cherry- Director of Public Partnerships of three+one. This webinar will equip you with the latest knowledge and trends in liquidity management. This presentation is designed to help you optimize your cash management operations and generate new revenue streams. -
Press Release
National Association of Counties Issues Statement on Bipartisan Debt Ceiling Deal
WASHINGTON – The National Association of Counties (NACo) today issued the following statement urging Congress to pass the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, a bill to provide for an increase to the debt ceiling and avoid default on the national debt. NACo Executive Director Matthew Chase said: -
Blog
Counties & the national debt: What defaulting on the national debt could mean for counties
At some point soon the United States government could default on the national debt. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has stated that if the federal debt ceiling is not raised by June 5, the federal government could miss or delay payments on their obligations resulting in a technical default. -
Blog
Pima County leans into innovation to enhance sustainability
This blog post is sponsored by NACo partner American Gas Association. Unlock the potential of wastewater facilities: Transform waste into clean, renewable energy and contribute to your county's sustainability goals.
-
Webinar
Worried about inflation? Strategies for Increasing Non-Tax Revenues.
June 8, 2023 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pmHosted by Joe Rulison, CEO, and William (Bill) Cherry- Director of Public Partnerships of three+one. This webinar will equip you with the latest knowledge and trends in liquidity management. This presentation is designed to help you optimize your cash management operations and generate new revenue streams.06081:00 pm<p><strong>Hosted by Joe Rulison, CEO, and William (Bill) Cherry- Director of Public Partnerships of three+one.</strong></p>
-
Webinar
NACo Briefing for Newly Elected Congressional Staff on Counties & the Federal Grant Process
June 8, 2023 , 3:00 pm – 4:00 pmOver the past two years, new federal laws have led to a significant increase in funding becoming available directly to counties. As a result, it is crucial for communities to understand how to navigate these opportunities and maximize these funding streams.06083:00 pm<p>Over the past two years, new federal laws have led to a significant increase in funding becoming available directly to counties. As a result, it is crucial for communities to understand how to navigate these opport
-
Reports & Toolkits
American Rescue Plan Resource Hub
In March of 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorized the $350 billion State and Local Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), which provided $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid to every county in America.Reports & Toolkitsdocument03092:00 pmReports & Toolkits<p>In March of 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorized the $350 billion State and Local Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), which provided $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid to
-
Basic page
ClearGov
ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.pagepagepage<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr> -
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
Related Resources
-
Blog
Counties & the national debt: What defaulting on the national debt could mean for counties
At some point soon the United States government could default on the national debt. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has stated that if the federal debt ceiling is not raised by June 5, the federal government could miss or delay payments on their obligations resulting in a technical default. -
Blog
Bipartisan Senators reintroduce legislation to restore tax-exempt status of advance refunding bonds
On May 9, U.S. Sens. -
Blog
Pima County leans into innovation to enhance sustainability
This blog post is sponsored by NACo partner American Gas Association. Unlock the potential of wastewater facilities: Transform waste into clean, renewable energy and contribute to your county's sustainability goals.
-
Press Release
National Association of Counties Issues Statement on Bipartisan Debt Ceiling Deal
WASHINGTON – The National Association of Counties (NACo) today issued the following statement urging Congress to pass the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, a bill to provide for an increase to the debt ceiling and avoid default on the national debt. NACo Executive Director Matthew Chase said: -
Reports & Toolkits
Myths & Facts: American Rescue Plan Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF), part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), allocated $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid for every county, parish and borough in America. -
Related Events
-
8Jun2023Webinar
Worried about inflation? Strategies for Increasing Non-Tax Revenues.
Jun. 8, 2023 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm -
8Jun2023Webinar
NACo Briefing for Newly Elected Congressional Staff on Counties & the Federal Grant Process
Jun. 8, 2023 , 3:00 pm – 4:00 pm
More From
-
Strengthening Local Economies through the Recovery Fund: Executive Summary
NACo's report examines how counties are leveraging American Rescue Plan resources to support communities and rebuild the economy, even as the pandemic continues to affect jobs, public health, housing, and more.
Learn More