In March 2021, Congress passed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). ARPA delivered resources to mount a public health response to COVID-19; directed economic relief to workers, families, and small businesses; and provided fiscal aid to state, local, and tribal governments through the $350 billion Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program. For local governments, which received $130 billion, the SLFRF program provided an unprecedented amount of funding alongside considerable flexibility to address both the acute effects of the COVID-19 crisis and the long-standing local challenges that exacerbated the impacts of the crisis on economically disadvantaged communities. The Department of the Treasury set deadlines for SLFRF dollars to be obligated by December 31, 2024 and spent by December 31, 2026.

To mark ARPA’s two-year anniversary, this report examines how local governments utilized the SLFRF program to spur an equitable economic recovery. Over the past two years, our organizations—Brookings Metro, Accelerator For America (AFA), and the National Association of Counties (NACo)—have been tracking ARPA implementation and working with local leaders in cities and counties across the nation on how to best deploy their SLFRF allocations. These on-the-ground engagements yielded considerable insights on how local governments navigated the complexities of ARPA implementation. Building on those applied projects, in early 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with local decisionmakers in 17 cities and counties to explore how they engaged community stakeholders, established recovery priorities, developed strategic investments, and monitored and evaluated ARPA’s early impacts.

Three major findings emerged from this research, each corresponding to a key phase of ARPA planning and implementation within local governments:

  • Local government leaders set priorities for local recovery, which were influenced by regulatory and political uncertainty, strategic continuity, and community engagement. In spring 2021, city and county officials were still very much in crisis mode, yet most all recognized the strategic importance of the SLFRF allocations they were about to receive. Confronted with this balance of crisis management and longer-term strategic planning, localities have been impressively entrepreneurial and innovative in setting priorities for SLFRF dollars in ways that drive greater inclusion and equity in their communities. Local leaders arrived at these priorities amid considerable uncertainty in the SLFRF rulemaking process and broader political debates in their communities. Some local governments established strategic priorities for ARPA investments based on pre-existing strategic plans, while others used the crisis to forge new or refreshed visions. Finally, community engagement in priority-setting was possible but not universal, and its degree differed from place to place.
  • Local governments pursued “dual-track” investment strategies, using the SLFRF program to both implement emergency relief and government stabilization measures as well as invest in rebuilding a more equitable economy. When the federal government allocated the first tranche of SLFRF dollars in spring 2021, local health and fiscal conditions necessitated that many local governments use the resources to invest in three key pillars—government operations, public health, and community aid—that would stabilize communities and local government. This first track (investments to rescue the economy) was followed by a second track focused on rebuilding the economy on a stronger, more inclusive foundation via investments in workforce, small businesses, housing, infrastructure, and neighborhood revitalization. Ultimately, well-designed approaches shared three characteristics. First, they were inclusive in their design—targeting historically disadvantaged households and neighborhoods. Second, they were sustainable—primarily one-time capital investments that will deliver sustained returns over time. And third, they focused on systems-level design that leveraged additional funders and improved capacity across entire policy domain systems (e.g., workforce, small business, community development).
  • Local governments are responsible for measuring impact across a range of projects, which is forcing them to upgrade their evaluation and tracking capabilities. One concern in implementing the SLFRF program was whether local governments could expand their performance management systems to track obligated and expended funds, assess outcomes, and report both pieces of information in a timely fashion to the Treasury Department. A relatively small set of local governments are investing in capacity to make the data that they report to Treasury accessible to the public at large. These online trackers and dashboards are allowing researchers, the media, and citizens to better understand the program’s early outcomes across individual projects and broader strategic domains. Given the SLFRF program’s expected impact on broad local outcomes (rather than just the outcomes reported to Treasury), some local governments are also using a more comprehensive set of indicators to track the recovery and provide critical context for their investments.

Finally, with the ARPA expenditure deadline looming, local leaders are focused on the long-term implications of SLFRF investments for their communities. This multidimensional challenge requires local leaders to sustain ARPA funding impact through a mix of strategic initiatives, existing and new complementary funding, greater cross-jurisdictional collaboration, and new impact-performance metrics. Federal agencies are key partners to local governments in ARPA funding, so enhancing flexible funding and organizing across those agencies could make a difference in ongoing implementation.

Map 1: This report draws upon interviews with 17 local governments

 

Related News

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – October 6, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features a federal shutdown FAQ, overdose prevention funding and more.

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – September 22, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features a short-term funding bill introduced to avert shutdown, new Rural Health Transformation Program and more.

Image of Capitol-side_2.jpg
Advocacy

House passes clean Continuing Resolution to fund the government through November 21

On September 16, the U.S. House passed the text of the Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 to extend government funding at current levels through November 21. 

Image of Capitol-front-day.jpg
Advocacy

Senate lawmakers release a Continuing Resolution to fund the government until October 31

On September 17, Senate lawmakers released a one-month stopgap funding bill to keep the government funded through October 31.

Heimel
Advocacy

NACo testifies before Congress in support of federal rural development programs

On September 18, Potter County, Pa. Commissioner Paul Heimel testified on behalf of NACo before the U.S. House Agriculture Committee Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development hearing, titled “USDA’s Rural Development: Delivering Vital Programs and Services to Rural America.” 

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – September 9, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features FEMA reform bill advancement, a major reorganization of the USDA and more.

Upcoming Events

A lock guards lines of data
Webinar

Securing Coverage: How Counties Can Navigate Cyber Insurance Hurdles

Safeguarding counties from cyber attacks in today's complex digital environment is a formidable challenge, especially when faced with tight budgets, limited resources, and the competing demands of diverse stakeholders. Cyber insurance offers a crucial safety net, but many counties find themselves grappling with the affordability and management of such coverage.

Join us for an exciting discussion with experienced county leaders as we uncover the hurdles governments face in securing cyber insurance. We will explore the evolving cyber threat landscape and reveal how a comprehensive cyber insurance assessment can offer practical solutions to bolster defenses and streamline coverage acquisition. 

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, October 16

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week ten of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, October 30

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week eleven of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

A woman inputs numbers into the calculator
Webinar

Modern Networks, Smarter Budgets: A County Leader’s Perspective

Join us for a fireside chat with Orleans County, NY, as they share how their team successfully transitioned from a traditional capital expense (CapEx) model to an operational expense (OpEx) model for network services.

When faced with rising maintenance costs and an expiring carrier contract, the county seized the opportunity to modernize its network and lock in predictable monthly costs. By bundling connectivity services with unified communications, they achieved immediate savings of over $124,000, eliminated recurring charges such as long-distance fees and third-party integration costs, and gained access to operational upgrades like call analytics and auto-attendants.

This shift not only strengthened financial planning through fixed monthly expenses but also freed up IT staff to focus on strategic initiatives.

Key takeaway: Rethinking your budget model can be just as impactful as upgrading your technology — delivering fiscal stability and enhanced services for your community.

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, November 13

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week twelve of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, December 11

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week thirteen of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.