In March 2021, Congress passed the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA). ARPA delivered resources to mount a public health response to COVID-19; directed economic relief to workers, families, and small businesses; and provided fiscal aid to state, local, and tribal governments through the $350 billion Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program. For local governments, which received $130 billion, the SLFRF program provided an unprecedented amount of funding alongside considerable flexibility to address both the acute effects of the COVID-19 crisis and the long-standing local challenges that exacerbated the impacts of the crisis on economically disadvantaged communities. The Department of the Treasury set deadlines for SLFRF dollars to be obligated by December 31, 2024 and spent by December 31, 2026.

To mark ARPA’s two-year anniversary, this report examines how local governments utilized the SLFRF program to spur an equitable economic recovery. Over the past two years, our organizations—Brookings Metro, Accelerator For America (AFA), and the National Association of Counties (NACo)—have been tracking ARPA implementation and working with local leaders in cities and counties across the nation on how to best deploy their SLFRF allocations. These on-the-ground engagements yielded considerable insights on how local governments navigated the complexities of ARPA implementation. Building on those applied projects, in early 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with local decisionmakers in 17 cities and counties to explore how they engaged community stakeholders, established recovery priorities, developed strategic investments, and monitored and evaluated ARPA’s early impacts.

Three major findings emerged from this research, each corresponding to a key phase of ARPA planning and implementation within local governments:

  • Local government leaders set priorities for local recovery, which were influenced by regulatory and political uncertainty, strategic continuity, and community engagement. In spring 2021, city and county officials were still very much in crisis mode, yet most all recognized the strategic importance of the SLFRF allocations they were about to receive. Confronted with this balance of crisis management and longer-term strategic planning, localities have been impressively entrepreneurial and innovative in setting priorities for SLFRF dollars in ways that drive greater inclusion and equity in their communities. Local leaders arrived at these priorities amid considerable uncertainty in the SLFRF rulemaking process and broader political debates in their communities. Some local governments established strategic priorities for ARPA investments based on pre-existing strategic plans, while others used the crisis to forge new or refreshed visions. Finally, community engagement in priority-setting was possible but not universal, and its degree differed from place to place.
  • Local governments pursued “dual-track” investment strategies, using the SLFRF program to both implement emergency relief and government stabilization measures as well as invest in rebuilding a more equitable economy. When the federal government allocated the first tranche of SLFRF dollars in spring 2021, local health and fiscal conditions necessitated that many local governments use the resources to invest in three key pillars—government operations, public health, and community aid—that would stabilize communities and local government. This first track (investments to rescue the economy) was followed by a second track focused on rebuilding the economy on a stronger, more inclusive foundation via investments in workforce, small businesses, housing, infrastructure, and neighborhood revitalization. Ultimately, well-designed approaches shared three characteristics. First, they were inclusive in their design—targeting historically disadvantaged households and neighborhoods. Second, they were sustainable—primarily one-time capital investments that will deliver sustained returns over time. And third, they focused on systems-level design that leveraged additional funders and improved capacity across entire policy domain systems (e.g., workforce, small business, community development).
  • Local governments are responsible for measuring impact across a range of projects, which is forcing them to upgrade their evaluation and tracking capabilities. One concern in implementing the SLFRF program was whether local governments could expand their performance management systems to track obligated and expended funds, assess outcomes, and report both pieces of information in a timely fashion to the Treasury Department. A relatively small set of local governments are investing in capacity to make the data that they report to Treasury accessible to the public at large. These online trackers and dashboards are allowing researchers, the media, and citizens to better understand the program’s early outcomes across individual projects and broader strategic domains. Given the SLFRF program’s expected impact on broad local outcomes (rather than just the outcomes reported to Treasury), some local governments are also using a more comprehensive set of indicators to track the recovery and provide critical context for their investments.

Finally, with the ARPA expenditure deadline looming, local leaders are focused on the long-term implications of SLFRF investments for their communities. This multidimensional challenge requires local leaders to sustain ARPA funding impact through a mix of strategic initiatives, existing and new complementary funding, greater cross-jurisdictional collaboration, and new impact-performance metrics. Federal agencies are key partners to local governments in ARPA funding, so enhancing flexible funding and organizing across those agencies could make a difference in ongoing implementation.

Map 1: This report draws upon interviews with 17 local governments

 

Related News

County Clerk Terry Wilbur Testifying
Advocacy

NACo testifies before Congress on brownfields revitalization

On May 7, Oswego County, N.Y. Clerk Terry Wilbur testifiedon behalf of NACo before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment at a hearing titled “Cleaning Up the Past, Building the Future: The Brownfields Program”.

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – May 6, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features 

Image of White-House.jpg
Advocacy

White House releases FY 2026 Budget Request: Top Highlights to Counties

The President’s budget requests cutting non-defense discretionary funding by 23 percent, amounting to $163 billion, and proposes a 7.6 percent spending cut to discretionary spending.

Image of Munibonds-toolkit_coverv2.jpg
Advocacy

NACo endorsed advanced refunding bills reintroduced in the 119th Congress

NACo endorsed these bills and supports counties’ ability to issue tax-exempt advance refunding bonds, which can save taxpayers millions of dollars.

bike
Advocacy

Key County Resources Ahead of ARPA SLFRF 2025 April 30 Reporting Deadline

As counties prepare to submit their 2025 Annual and Q1 Project and Expenditure (P&E) Reports for the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) on Wednesday, April 30, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has released several helpful new resources to streamline the process. For counties that are planning to obligate their entire ARPA allocation towards the revenue loss standard allowance, these resources will be especially helpful. 

John McLennon shows off a geothermal wellhead on the Utah FORGE site in Beaver County, Utah. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

County’s groundwork helps set the stage for energy breakthrough

Amid the high-level work that put groundbreaking geothermal energy projects into Beaver County, Utah, the local work has been crucial to making the endeavors a success.

Upcoming Events

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, Week 1

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in every other week for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

Image of GettyImages-909045800.jpg
Webinar

Understanding the House Ways & Means Tax Proposal: Key Takeaways for County Governments

On May 12, the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee released their proposed tax package, which includes trillions in tax cuts and changes to popular tax credits. Join NACo staff as they analyze key takeaways for counties on the tax proposal and share insights into the ongoing reconciliation process.

Image of tax_2400v2.png
Webinar

Safeguarding Taxpayer Assets: Inside Suffolk County’s Bank Account Collateralization Program

In today’s evolving regulatory and banking landscape, public entities must have clear visibility into their deposits, collateralization, and verification processes. Yet, many municipalities lack a comprehensive solution to streamline this complex responsibility.

Join Stephen Acquario (Executive Director, NYSAC), John M. Kennedy Jr. (Suffolk County Comptroller), and Alex DeRosa (Associate Vice President, three+one) as they host an inside look at how Suffolk County has implemented a cutting-edge bank account collateralization program. This session will explore:

  • How having a single point of reference for bank collateral enhances audit functions and strengthens financial oversight
     

  • Common misconceptions about collateralization programs—why more counties aren’t adopting them and whether implementation is as complex as it seems
     

  • The impact of a well-structured collateralization program on credit ratings and financial stability

Protecting taxpayer assets requires more than just compliance—it requires certainty. Discover how to bring transparency and security to your entity’s financial management.

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, Week 2

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week two of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

Image of Capitol-side_1.jpg
Webinar

Inside Washington: County Impacts from the White House & Congress, Week 3

Join NACo’s Government Affairs team for week three of a biweekly series on key developments from the White House and Congress. Discussions will focus on policies and actions that directly impact counties — from federal funding and regulatory changes to intergovernmental partnerships. Tune in for an inside look at how these evolving federal dynamics may shape county priorities, responsibilities and operations.

Image of coal-report_cover.jpg
Webinar

New BRECC Toolkit: Coal Communities’ Pathways for Economic Diversification

Join the BRECC National Network to learn how coal counties are diversifying their economies through increasing housing supply, providing innovative workforce development opportunities and revitalizing downtowns.