All Elections Are Local: The County Role in the Elections Process

Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
Reports & ToolkitsIn the United States, the nation’s 3,069 counties traditionally administer and fund elections at the local level, including overseeing polling places and coordinating poll workers for federal, state and local elections.All Elections Are Local: The County Role in the Elections Process
-
Document
All Elections Are Local: The County Role in the Elections Process
Elections in the United States are administered in a highly decentralized process through which each state shapes its own election laws, which in turn shape the roles counties play in the months and weeks leading up to Election Day. In the United States, the nation’s 3,069 counties traditionally administer and fund elections at the local level, including overseeing polling places and coordinating poll workers for federal, state and local elections. County election officials work diligently with federal, state and other local election officials to ensure the safety and security of our voting systems. County election officials strive to administer elections in a way that is accurate, safe, secure and accessible for all voters.
Who runs elections for counties?
The county official overseeing elections varies from state to state and may have one of several titles, including county auditor, county clerk or commissioner of elections. These officials are responsible for overseeing the allocation of voting machines, managing polling locations, ensuring the accessibility, integrity and efficiency of the polling process, and many other tasks to ensure elections run smoothly.
During the 2016 general election, counties oversaw over 100,000 polling places and coordinated over 700,000 poll workers.
Security Risks and County Responses
Preserving the integrity and security of America’s elections remains a top priority for top priority for county election officials, and counties must also comply with various state and federal mandates regarding election security. Voting systems generally have three components: voter registration, voter check-in systems and voting machines, and counties are meeting the challenges presented by each of these components.
Voter Registration
The 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requires states to develop computerized, statewide voter registration lists. States continue to modernize voter registration through initiatives like electronic registration and online registration. In addition to reducing the potential for voter fraud, the modernization of voter registration also makes voter registration more accessible to eligible citizens and reduces costs. The traditional paper-based process still exists and is still used by numerous states. In addition to electronic voter registration, ten states plus the District of Columbia have authorized automatic registration, automatically registering eligible citizens, unless the citizen declines, who interact with government agencies.
Polling Places
Counties consider polling locations that are accessible to voters and optimize the deployment of voting machines and poll workers. Many counties enlist local law enforcement to conduct security sweeps of polling locations prior to Election Day. Most states also train poll workers to follow specific requirements regarding restrictions in and around polling locations.
Counties hire and train poll workers to ensure they are well equipped to assist voters and protect against voter fraud or other security risks. Additionally, election officials are prepared for a wide range of “hard security” challenges at polling locations, including mitigating natural disasters, following protocols for an active shooter or fire and other emergencies.
Voting Machine Options
Optical Scan
Scanning devices that tabulate paper ballots. Ballots may either be scanned on precinct-based optical systems in the polling place or collected in a ballot box and then scanned at a central location.
Direct-Recording Electronic (DRE) Voting Machine
A voting machine that is designed to allow a direct vote on the machine by physically touching a screen, monitor or other device. The machine records the individual votes, and vote totals are stored in computer memory, which is later collected by poll workers. Some DRE machines have the ability to produce a paper trail that can be used for audits and recounts.
Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)
A permanent paper record that allows the voter to review a paper record of their votes before casting the ballot. In elections, voter-marked paper ballots and VVPATs are used as the vote of record for audits, recounts and general election counts.
How do counties secure voting machines?
Through HAVA, Congress sought to improve the election process by promoting the latest technology and moving away from traditional lever and punch-card machines.
Today, approximately three out of every five counties use optical-scan technology, which employs a scanner to read marked paper ballots and record the results. Two out of five use direct-recording electronic (DRE) equipment that allows voters to make their selections via touch screen or other digital interface and records the results on a memory device. Regardless of the type used, voting machines are never connected to the internet or to each other. The transport and storage of voting machines, as well as ballots and vote tabulations, are directed by state and local security protocols.
Voting machines are the voters’ primary focus on Election Day. While the type of machine each state or county uses may vary, every state has specific policies governing voting machine setup.
How much does it cost to run elections?
The cost of running elections is difficult to calculate and varies by county. According to the California Institute of Technology/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Voting Technology Project, county election expenditures were an estimated $1 billion in 2000. However, after HAVA was passed, substantial election reforms were implemented that included upgrading voting systems to ensure that voters could verify their selections before their ballot was cast. The need to continually upgrade voting machines has increased the cost to run elections. The impact on counties varies depending on factors like how many machines are used in the county, which vendor is selected for the machines, and if the vendor provides maintenance for the machines. Costs, in addition to the actual equipment, include transporting units to and from polling locations, the printing of paper ballots when applicable and the annual maintenance of the machines.
Are counties responsible for all costs?
While the majority of election-related costs are borne by counties, states support some facets of elections, such as maintaining statewide voter registration databases, contributing funding for voting equipment and supplies and disseminating information to voters.
Sources: Automatic Voter Registration and Modernization in the States, 2018; NACo analysis of U.S. Election Commission Data, 2014; National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) data on voting equipment, 2015; NCSL data on election costs, 2016.
To learn more, be sure to check out:
- NACo.org/topics/ELECTIONS
- EAC.gov
In the United States, the nation’s 3,069 counties traditionally administer and fund elections at the local level, including overseeing polling places and coordinating poll workers for federal, state and local elections.2018-11-06Reports & Toolkits2023-04-11
Elections in the United States are administered in a highly decentralized process through which each state shapes its own election laws, which in turn shape the roles counties play in the months and weeks leading up to Election Day. In the United States, the nation’s 3,069 counties traditionally administer and fund elections at the local level, including overseeing polling places and coordinating poll workers for federal, state and local elections. County election officials work diligently with federal, state and other local election officials to ensure the safety and security of our voting systems. County election officials strive to administer elections in a way that is accurate, safe, secure and accessible for all voters.
Who runs elections for counties?
The county official overseeing elections varies from state to state and may have one of several titles, including county auditor, county clerk or commissioner of elections. These officials are responsible for overseeing the allocation of voting machines, managing polling locations, ensuring the accessibility, integrity and efficiency of the polling process, and many other tasks to ensure elections run smoothly.
During the 2016 general election, counties oversaw over 100,000 polling places and coordinated over 700,000 poll workers.
Security Risks and County Responses
Preserving the integrity and security of America’s elections remains a top priority for top priority for county election officials, and counties must also comply with various state and federal mandates regarding election security. Voting systems generally have three components: voter registration, voter check-in systems and voting machines, and counties are meeting the challenges presented by each of these components.
Voter Registration
The 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requires states to develop computerized, statewide voter registration lists. States continue to modernize voter registration through initiatives like electronic registration and online registration. In addition to reducing the potential for voter fraud, the modernization of voter registration also makes voter registration more accessible to eligible citizens and reduces costs. The traditional paper-based process still exists and is still used by numerous states. In addition to electronic voter registration, ten states plus the District of Columbia have authorized automatic registration, automatically registering eligible citizens, unless the citizen declines, who interact with government agencies.
Polling Places
Counties consider polling locations that are accessible to voters and optimize the deployment of voting machines and poll workers. Many counties enlist local law enforcement to conduct security sweeps of polling locations prior to Election Day. Most states also train poll workers to follow specific requirements regarding restrictions in and around polling locations.
Counties hire and train poll workers to ensure they are well equipped to assist voters and protect against voter fraud or other security risks. Additionally, election officials are prepared for a wide range of “hard security” challenges at polling locations, including mitigating natural disasters, following protocols for an active shooter or fire and other emergencies.
Voting Machine OptionsOptical ScanScanning devices that tabulate paper ballots. Ballots may either be scanned on precinct-based optical systems in the polling place or collected in a ballot box and then scanned at a central location. Direct-Recording Electronic (DRE) Voting MachineA voting machine that is designed to allow a direct vote on the machine by physically touching a screen, monitor or other device. The machine records the individual votes, and vote totals are stored in computer memory, which is later collected by poll workers. Some DRE machines have the ability to produce a paper trail that can be used for audits and recounts. Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)A permanent paper record that allows the voter to review a paper record of their votes before casting the ballot. In elections, voter-marked paper ballots and VVPATs are used as the vote of record for audits, recounts and general election counts. |
How do counties secure voting machines?
Through HAVA, Congress sought to improve the election process by promoting the latest technology and moving away from traditional lever and punch-card machines.
Today, approximately three out of every five counties use optical-scan technology, which employs a scanner to read marked paper ballots and record the results. Two out of five use direct-recording electronic (DRE) equipment that allows voters to make their selections via touch screen or other digital interface and records the results on a memory device. Regardless of the type used, voting machines are never connected to the internet or to each other. The transport and storage of voting machines, as well as ballots and vote tabulations, are directed by state and local security protocols.
Voting machines are the voters’ primary focus on Election Day. While the type of machine each state or county uses may vary, every state has specific policies governing voting machine setup.
How much does it cost to run elections?
The cost of running elections is difficult to calculate and varies by county. According to the California Institute of Technology/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Voting Technology Project, county election expenditures were an estimated $1 billion in 2000. However, after HAVA was passed, substantial election reforms were implemented that included upgrading voting systems to ensure that voters could verify their selections before their ballot was cast. The need to continually upgrade voting machines has increased the cost to run elections. The impact on counties varies depending on factors like how many machines are used in the county, which vendor is selected for the machines, and if the vendor provides maintenance for the machines. Costs, in addition to the actual equipment, include transporting units to and from polling locations, the printing of paper ballots when applicable and the annual maintenance of the machines.
Are counties responsible for all costs?
While the majority of election-related costs are borne by counties, states support some facets of elections, such as maintaining statewide voter registration databases, contributing funding for voting equipment and supplies and disseminating information to voters.
Sources: Automatic Voter Registration and Modernization in the States, 2018; NACo analysis of U.S. Election Commission Data, 2014; National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) data on voting equipment, 2015; NCSL data on election costs, 2016.
To learn more, be sure to check out:

About Eryn Hurley (Full Bio)
Director of Government Affairs & Federal Fellowship Initiative
Eryn serves as the Director for NACo’s Government Affairs Department. In this capacity, she assists in Legislative and Executive Branch outreach and advocacy of the association’s legislative priorities and policy development.More from Eryn Hurley
-
Blog
U.S. Senators reintroduce legislation aimed to protect local election officials
On April 28, U.S. Senate Rules Committee Chair Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) re-introduced the Election Worker Protection Act (S. -
Webinar
Earmarks 101: What You Need to Know to Get Started
May. 23, 2023 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pmCongress reinstituted Congressionally Directed Spending (often referred to as earmarks) in early 2021. Since then, hundreds of county governments have secured hundreds of millions in funding during the last three funding cycles. -
Blog
Now accepting policy resolutions and platform changes for the 2023 NACo Annual Conference
In preparation for the National Association of Counties (NACo) 2023 Annual Conference & Exposition, NACo members are invited to submit policy resolutions and platform changes to be considered during the conference. -
Blog
How counties are taking control of constituent communication
This blog post is sponsored by NACo partner Indigov. Enhance your government outreach! Discover the best strategies for effective constituent communication in our latest blog. -
Blog
Former County Leaders introduce the Restore the Partnership Act in the 118th Congress
On May 18, Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.) reintroduced the Restore the Partnership Act (H.R. -
Blog
Supreme Court case could impact county property tax revenue in 21 states
On April 25, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Tyler v. Hennepin County, a case challenging Minnesota’s statutory property foreclosure scheme, which allows local governments to keep the surplus proceeds after selling property forfeited due to tax delinquency.
Contact
-
Director of Government Affairs & Federal Fellowship Initiative(202) 942-4204
Related News
-
BlogU.S. Election Assistance Commission recognizes county excellence in 2022 Clearinghouse AwardsJun. 9, 2023
-
BlogU.S. Senators reintroduce legislation aimed to protect local election officialsMay. 25, 2023
-
BlogNACo sends letter to House and Senate Appropriations Committee leadership urging continued election security grants funding for Fiscal Year 2024Apr. 14, 2023
Related Resources
-
Reports & ToolkitsLegislative Analysis for Counties: The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023Jun. 1, 2023
-
Press ReleaseCounties Recognize Mental Health Awareness MonthMay. 1, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsMyths & Facts: American Rescue Plan Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery FundsApr. 24, 2023
Related Resources
-
Blog
U.S. Election Assistance Commission recognizes county excellence in 2022 Clearinghouse Awards
On May 23, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) announced the winners of its 2022 Clearinghouse (“Clearie”) awards, recognizing 24 jurisdictions for its election administration practices during the 2022 primary and midterm elections. -
Blog
U.S. Senators reintroduce legislation aimed to protect local election officials
On April 28, U.S. Senate Rules Committee Chair Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) re-introduced the Election Worker Protection Act (S. -
Blog
NACo sends letter to House and Senate Appropriations Committee leadership urging continued election security grants funding for Fiscal Year 2024
On March 31, NACo sent a letter to leaders of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate Appropriations Committees urging the inclusion of funding for election security grants in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill.
-
Reports & Toolkits
Evolving Elections: How State Legislation Will Impact the County Role in Election Administration
Elections in the United States are administered in a highly decentralized process through which each state shapes its own election laws. In turn, states shape the role counties play in the months and weeks leading up to Election Day. -
Reports & Toolkits
The County Role in Elections: How Counties Administer Secure and Accurate Elections
Jump to Section The County Role in Elections Counties and Election Security -
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Analysis for Counties: American Confidence in Elections Act
Jump to Section Key Highlights Overview of Provisions Election Administration
Upcoming Events
-
12Jun2023
-
13Jun2023Webinar
Prenatal-to-Three Peer Learning Network: How the Social Determinants of Health Impact Families and Children
Jun. 13, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm -
15Jun2023Webinar
Prenatal-to-Three Peer Learning Network: How the Social Determinants of Health Impact Families and Children
Jun. 15, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm
More From
-
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023
The bipartisan debt ceiling deal brings certainty to counties and includes provisions relevant to local leaders, such as spending cuts, permitting reform, work requirements for federal public assistance programs, and reinstating federal student loan payments.
Learn More