Counties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Intergovernmental Partnerships
Upcoming Events
Related News
The Recovery Fund and Partnerships
The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which NACo helped to develop and strongly advocated to pass, allocates $65.1 billion. These funds provide direct, flexible aid for every county, parish and borough in America. Counties are on the front lines in delivering this aid to residents and are a driving force connecting communities and strengthening the economy.
As directed by the ARPA and the U.S. Department of Treasury, counties can invest Recovery Funds into a broad range of programs, services and projects under four categories: public sector revenue; public health and economic response; premium pay for essential workers and water, sewer and broadband infrastructure.
Since the enactment of the ARPA, America’s counties have been working hard to develop Recovery Fund implementation plans that will help spur an equitable economic recovery across the nation. As sound financial stewards, counties are investing these critical Recovery Funds to ensure the health and well-being of our nation’s residents and the economic vitality of our local communities. Many counties are in the preliminary stages of development and implementation of Recovery Fund Plans. This report highlights county investments complemented by intergovernmental partnerships to efficiently deliver programs and services, leverage state funding opportunities and support a regional approach to recovery.
Counties Manage Billions in Intergovernmental Revenue
Annually, counties receive $196 billion in intergovernmental revenue including federal, state and local sources. These funds are integral for county operations, services and programs.
Source: NACo Analysis of U.S. Census Bureau - Census of Individual Governments: Finance, 2017
Counties Plan to Invest Recovery Funds to:
Counties are Fostering Intergovernmental Partnerships to Support Key Investments
How will counties invest the funds? NACo analysis of 200 county ARPA Recovery Fund plans reveals county-designed investments in the community across key areas of need. These local priorities are found within county plans at the rate displayed in the chart. Intergovernmental partnerships are unique in that they encompass all topic areas detailed below. The examples in this report further illustrate county allocations to support these integral partnerships across areas of need.
Counties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Rural Communities
This report highlights how counties have begun investing Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to support rural communities and residents across the country.
Resource
County Investments of American Rescue Plan Recovery Funds
U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Chevron doctrine to reshape the federal administrative state
In major ruling, U.S. Supreme Court overturns longstanding precedent deferring to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous statute.
U.S. Supreme Court protects key flexibility for county governments responding to homelessness
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case of major significance for counties working to develop comprehensive responses to the homelessness crisis.
U.S. Supreme Court decision halts Purdue Pharma opioid settlement
Supreme Court ruling upends $6 billion settlement agreement between Purdue Pharma and impacted state, county and tribal governments and residents.
NACo testifies before Congress on local consultation through tribal land-in-trust process
On June 26, Sonoma County, Calif. Supervisor David Rabbitt testified on behalf of NACo before the U.S. House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian and Insular Affairs during a hearing on legislation that would clarify the Secretary of the Interior’s authority to place land into trust.
U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow decision in malicious prosecution case
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Chiaverini v. Ohio, a case focused on the relationship between probable cause and malicious prosecution claims against local government.
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement.