Reports & Toolkits

Coronavirus Relief Fund: Review of Federal Fiscal Assistance and of Innovative County Response Strategies

  • Document

    Coronavirus Relief Fund: Review of Federal Fiscal Assistance and of Innovative County Response Strategies

    Counties are serving on the frontline of the pandemic response with the support of CRF funding in public health, emergency management, social services, and public safety. Due to COVID-19, county services are under critical strain from increased demand. In response, counties have adapted and used Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) dollars to provide life-sustaining support and in innovative ways.

    NACo requested that the National Academy of Public Administrators (NAPA) conduct an independent assessment of the CRF and the effectiveness of the federal funding in meeting the needs of the counties and in providing the controls warranted for federal funds. NACo also requested that the study examine innovative strategies undertaken by counties receiving CRF funds to address the pandemic, focusing on initiatives that further social equity.

    Through this study, NAPA has identified seven key areas in which policy changes could improve program effectiveness for future programs such as the CRF.

    • A better coordinated national response
    • Federal departments or agencies responsible for implementing a program such as CRF need legislative funding to stand up a program office with personnel with the skills and expertise needed to design the program, develop effective guidance, and anticipate and respond to questions and issues that will arise, especially during early days.
    • Comprehensive guidance for program operations needs to be available when a program is initiated or very soon thereafter
    • State and local governments should be allowed to make expenditures with longer-term payoffs, and the funds uses should be flexible
    • Program design should allow coverage of operational expenses and revenue replacement, not only coverage of new COVID-related costs
    • Future legislation should ensure that the shared services agreements between counties and cities are considered in funding allocations
    • Future federal relief legislation should require formal evaluation of program impact during and at the end of the program
    The report outlines seven recommendations for improved future program effectiveness and examines innovative county strategies for pandemic responses.
    2021-03-10
    Reports & Toolkits
    2022-08-30

Counties are serving on the frontline of the pandemic response with the support of CRF funding in public health, emergency management, social services, and public safety. Due to COVID-19, county services are under critical strain from increased demand. In response, counties have adapted and used Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) dollars to provide life-sustaining support and in innovative ways.

NACo requested that the National Academy of Public Administrators (NAPA) conduct an independent assessment of the CRF and the effectiveness of the federal funding in meeting the needs of the counties and in providing the controls warranted for federal funds. NACo also requested that the study examine innovative strategies undertaken by counties receiving CRF funds to address the pandemic, focusing on initiatives that further social equity.

Through this study, NAPA has identified seven key areas in which policy changes could improve program effectiveness for future programs such as the CRF.

  • A better coordinated national response
  • Federal departments or agencies responsible for implementing a program such as CRF need legislative funding to stand up a program office with personnel with the skills and expertise needed to design the program, develop effective guidance, and anticipate and respond to questions and issues that will arise, especially during early days.
  • Comprehensive guidance for program operations needs to be available when a program is initiated or very soon thereafter
  • State and local governments should be allowed to make expenditures with longer-term payoffs, and the funds uses should be flexible
  • Program design should allow coverage of operational expenses and revenue replacement, not only coverage of new COVID-related costs
  • Future legislation should ensure that the shared services agreements between counties and cities are considered in funding allocations
  • Future federal relief legislation should require formal evaluation of program impact during and at the end of the program
Standard
  • Basic page

    The Stepping Up Initiative

    In May 2015, NACo and partners at the CSG Justice Center and APA Foundation launched Stepping Up: A National Initiative to Reduce the Number of People with Mental Illnesses in Jails.
    page

    <table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
    <td>

  • Reports & Toolkits

    COVID-19 Recovery Clearinghouse

    The COVID-19 Recovery Clearinghouse features timely resources for counties, including allocation estimations, examples of county programs using federal coronavirus relief funds, the latest news and more.
    03
    12
    7:15 pm
    Reports & Toolkits

    <table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="ad-block no-top-margin no-bullets">
    <caption>Jump to Section</caption>

  • 01
    05
    12:15 pm
    Reports & Toolkits

    <table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
    <td>

  • Basic page

    Live Healthy U.S. Counties

    The National Association of Counties (NACo) Live Healthy Prescription, Health & Dental Discount Program is a NO-COST program available to all member counties.
    page

    <h1>With <a id="naco" name="naco">NACo</a>, Saving Feels Better</h1>

  • page

    <table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
    <tbody>
    <tr>

  • Basic page

    Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee

    All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Priorities
    page

    <p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>

Related News

Related Resources

More From