What is the USPS ballot mail rule?

On Aug. 26, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) issued a final rule, Ballot Mail for Federal Elections, effective Aug. 21, that sets standards for the delivery of outbound mail-in ballots through the U.S. postal system. Those standards include new federal envelope requirements and a new Federal Ballot Mail Portal system that requires voter data from the state election official to verify a ballot before it can be delivered to the voter’s registered address. The verification standard applies only to outbound mail-in ballots delivered to a voter’s registered address. 

The rule took effect immediately and was published in the Federal Register on Aug. 26. A federal district court issued a preliminary injunction on Sept. 5 blocking enforcement of the rule’s key mandatory provisions through the Nov. 3 election. The White House has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift that block, so this could still change quickly.

Background

The rule implements Executive Order 14399, issued March 31, 2026, which directed USPS to propose standards under which it would not transmit mail-in ballots to people absent from a state-specific list. Counties administer elections in most U.S. jurisdictions, and roughly 31.4 percent of voters cast ballots by mail in 2024. Counties design, print and mail ballot envelopes; maintain the systems that generate them; tabulate election results and answer to voters, all while implementing elections under state and federal law.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The rule is pending in court, but counties should not wait for a final ruling to understand what it would require. Counties should monitor the litigation closely but begin evaluating the rule's impact on their own operations now and work with their state election official and county counsel on determining how to move forward. If the rule is upheld, election administrators will need to make real changes to envelope design, barcode generation, data systems, staffing and mail entry before this year’s general elections begin.

Final rule impact highlights

The changes below are the most significant shifts for counties and election officials. The provisions table that follows provides a detailed analysis.

  • New USPS Federal Ballot Mail Portal: Counties must register for a USPS Federal Ballot Mail Portal and upload the name and address, and outbound and return barcode numbers for every voter receiving a federal ballot by mail. Ballots may not be mailed until that data is in the system.
  • USPS Delivery Conditions: USPS checks each outbound mailing against data entered in the Portal before accepting it. A mailing that fails is returned to the county rather than delivered to voters. The rule includes no safe harbors for minor or correctable defects, no guaranteed acceptance during Portal outages and no emergency process for replacement and court-ordered ballots.
  • New Unique Barcodes Requirements: Many counties already use per-voter Intelligent Mail barcodes (IMb) on outbound ballots but a single generic barcode on returns. Unique return barcodes mean redesigning and reordering return envelope inventory and generating per-voter return barcodes.
  • Increased Risk for Counties: USPS assumes no responsibility for a mailing until it is accepted and none for delays caused by mailer noncompliance. Responsibility for barcode creation, envelope design and printing rests with the county or its vendor.
  • Portal Access Depends on State Election Officials: The state chief election official authorizes every Portal user, including county users. A state that declines to participate over voter-data concerns would leave its counties unable to mail federal ballots – a consequence for counties that results from a decision made at the state level.
  • Ballots Collection Boxes No Longer Accepted: Outbound federal ballot mail must be entered at a Business Mail Entry Unit (BMEU) or a USPS retail counter, including manual post offices. Blue collection boxes and retail lobby boxes are prohibited. Counties must also physically separate federal ballot mail from primary, Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) and state-and-local-only ballot mail.
  • Unfunded Mandate: The rule provides no federal funding for the Portal, for state system integration or for county compliance — no envelope redesign, reprinting, barcode capability, system changes, staff time or training. Indirect cost rates offer no recovery mechanism.

Detailed provisions: what the rule requires

Scope and coverage

Applies to blank ballots counties mail to voters and to the return envelopes voters use, for federal general, special and runoff elections. Primaries, state-and-local-only elections and UOCAVA ballots are excluded. Where a county mails a ballot carrying both federal and state contests — the norm in most counties — the entire mailing is treated as federal ballot mail and the rule applies in full.

A state chief election official may notify USPS at least 90 days before a federal election of intent to use the mail for ballots. It is optional, is not binding and requires no lists. Counties have no role, and the absence of notice does not prevent a county from enrolling later. The window for November 3, 2026 has already closed.

Envelope and design requirements

Both outbound and return envelopes must carry the Official Election Mail logo, be automation compatible, and bear the voter's unique IMb with delivery point ZIP and a federal ballot identifier. Counties or their vendors are responsible for creating the barcodes and for envelope design and printing. State-required elements such as affidavits and accessibility features may be retained.

Counties must submit outbound and return envelopes to USPS for mail piece design review and receive feedback before ballots may be mailed. Review is required once per election cycle, and a single statewide design covers all subdivisions. USPS aims to return feedback within two business days.

The federal ballot mail portal

Every jurisdiction mailing federal ballots must have a registered Portal account, completed no later than two business days before a mailing. The state chief election official authorizes all users, so counties cannot register on their own initiative. County staff, print vendors and mail service providers may all be authorized users, which allows a county to delegate data entry.

For every voter receiving a mail ballot, counties must upload the name and address as printed on the envelope, the outbound barcode, the return barcode and the originating state. No date of birth, Social Security number or other registration detail is collected. The data must be in the Portal before the mailing is presented for acceptance. 

Data is due at least 30 days before the election "to the extent practicable," or by the state-law date ballots begin going out. Counties may make supplemental submissions for late registrants, new requests and replacement ballots until the last day ballots may be mailed under state law. 

USPS compiles each state's participation list and returns it to the chief election official on or about the date of the election, containing only what the state submitted. Counties would receive it, if at all, through the state and after the mailing period has closed.

Mail entry, verification and noncompliance

Counties must enter outbound federal ballot mail at a BMEU or a USPS retail counter, including manual post offices. Collection boxes and retail lobby boxes are prohibited. Counties should tell the postal clerk handling the mailing if it contains non-federal ballots.

Before accepting a county's mailing, USPS evaluates whether it meets the outbound envelope standards and whether it is going to individuals enrolled in the Portal. USPS states it will not compare data against voter rolls, evaluate individual voters, determine eligibility or open ballot mail – it is checking whether the voter appears on the list the state election official submitted to the Portal, not whether the voter is eligible. 

A noncompliant mailing is not accepted and is returned to the county, which must correct the errors before resubmitting. The county may request further USPS review of a refusal. USPS rejects the entire mailing rather than the individual piece, and the rule contains no piece-level severability. The rule provides no safe harbor for minor or correctable defects, no guaranteed acceptance during Portal outages and no emergency escalation for replacement and court-ordered ballots.

Receipt of a mailing does not constitute verified compliance, counties should not treat USPS accepting ballots as proof of compliance. USPS assumes no responsibility for a mailing until it enters the mail stream, and none for service delays where the county or its vendor did not meet the standards. States are fully responsible for maintaining the accuracy and contents of their lists.

There is no process for an individual voter to appeal exclusion from a participation list or the return of a mailing. Appeal rights run to the county as ballot mailer, not to the voter, and access to the list is limited to personnel whose duties require it. A voter would generally not learn of a problem until a ballot failed to arrive and would then call the county.

Voter privacy, cost and funding

A system of records notice – a formal government notice describing how personal data will be used – published July 17, 2026, sets a five-year retention period, encryption of online transmissions and access limited by badge and log-on to personnel whose duties require it. Lists are not publicly disclosed. USPS grounds retention in part on law enforcement authority. Counties collected this data from residents under state law and would field questions about where it went.

USPS states that only the name and address printed on the outside of the envelope must be submitted — for a program participant, the substitute address rather than the confidential one — that confidential information known only to the state need not be provided and that the rule is compatible with state programs. It does not address participants whose names are also protected. 

The rule provides no funding for the Portal, for state integration or for county compliance. USPS states it is prepared to implement within available resources and that the rule falls outside the Paperwork Reduction Act – the law that normally requires government to study the cost of new data-collection requirements – so no burden or cost analysis was conducted. Envelope redesign and reprinting, barcode capability, system changes, staff time, training and voter communication would be absorbed locally.

What counties should do now

Hold Steady on Operations

  • Do not change mail ballot procedures, envelope inventory or vendor arrangements for November 2026.
  • Track the pending Supreme Court appeal and any 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals action daily; the Sept. 5 preliminary injunction blocking the rule through Nov. 3 could still change on short notice. 
  • Stay in direct contact with your state chief election official's office — Portal access, state participation and any voluntary submissions run through the state.
  • Prepare for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) citizenship list as a separate workstream; it is not blocked by the court order, and direction should come through your state election office.
  • Have draft guidance ready to issue within hours in case a stay puts the rule back in effect mid-cycle.

Assess Readiness Without Spending

  • Determine whether your outbound and return envelopes carry unique per-voter (IMb) barcodes today.
  • Confirm whether your election management system can hold and reconcile outbound and return barcode data.
  • Ask your print vendor whether it already generates serialized barcodes and could handle Portal uploads on your behalf.
  • Price a redesign and reorder of outbound and return envelope stock, with a realistic lead time.
  • Identify whether state legislative action, attorney general guidance or board approval would be required before you could change envelope design.
  • Count how many separate outbound mailings you make in a cycle, since each requires its own Portal submission.

Document and Escalate

  • Document compliance costs and operational impacts as they accrue. Concrete county-level figures are the gap in the federal record.
  • Quantify burden in staff hours and dollars, and name specific programs, mailings and voter counts affected.
  • Route member questions and impact reports to NACo so they can be carried into appropriations and any future rulemaking.
  • Share your county's specific concerns with your U.S. House Representative and both U.S. Senators; appropriations is the more realistic near-term option than new legislation. 
  • Press the operational asks: full funding, timelines tied to election calendars, county officials in Portal design and testing, an appeal path for refused mailings and excluded voters, piece-level rather than batch rejection and confirmation that counties are not liable for state nonparticipation.
2150381046
Find tools

Election Administration Resource Hub

NACo's resource hub connects county officials with tools, funding opportunities and other resources for election administration.

Explore the hub

Related Analysis, Reports & Toolkits

Explore the Resource Library for our latest reports, analysis, toolkits and more.

Related News

1172767676
Advocacy

USPS releases its final rule affecting mail-in voting for federal elections

The USPS released its final rule imposing new requirements on how state and local governments must administer mail-in voting, including new ballot envelope requirements and the creation of a national portal of mail-in voter data.

144210903
Advocacy

UPDATE: Supreme Court declines emergency review of USPS mail-in ballot rule, leaving nationwide block in place

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision to allow the Trump administration to move forward with its Executive Order 14399 directing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to compile official U.S. citizenship lists to be used in voter citizenship verification and the U.S. Postal Service to impose new mail-in ballot restrictions.

Image of Elections.jpg
Advocacy

House advances SAVE America Act — counties urged to contact Senators now

NACo urges counties to reach out to Senators opposing immediate and unfunded changes to election administration in the SAVE America Act (H.R. 7296/S. 1383), which the House passed as part the National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 8800).

Image of CM-elections.jpg
Advocacy

NACo urges Congress to protect HAVA Election Security Grants in FY 2027

NACo sent a letter to congressional leaders urging the Senate to restore Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Election Security Grants to at least the FY 2026 enacted level of $45 million in the FY 2027 FSGG appropriations bill.