Foreign ownership of agricultural land is receiving increasing attention from Capitol Hill and state and county governments across the country, especially ownership and transactions involving individuals and entities associated with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While the total amount of foreign-owned agricultural land has increased over the past decade, the percentage of agricultural land owned by foreign individuals or business entities sits at just over 3 percent of all U.S. agricultural land. Entities from Canada and European nations represent the largest foreign owners of U.S. agricultural land. Although Chinese holdings account for less than one percent of total foreign-owned U.S. agricultural land, the amount of land owned or leased by Chinese-associated individuals or entities has increased by over 400 percent from 2010 to 2021. 

While no federal laws restrict foreign agricultural land ownership, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) must regularly report on foreign investments in U.S. agriculture under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA). In turn, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Agriculture-FDA Appropriations Bill included a provision adding USDA to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), requiring USDA to report all agricultural land transactions under AFIDA that may pose a risk to national security. In turn, several pieces of bipartisan legislation that would enact additional reporting requirements for land transactions involving foreign entities or restrictions on foreign ownership are currently under consideration in Congress, including provisions within the House and Senate proposals for the 2024 Farm Bill.

24 states restrict foreign ownership of agricultural land in some form, while 15 states have implemented reporting requirements for foreign transactions using mechanisms similar to AFIDA. While there are currently no local laws banning or restricting foreign ownership, county governments may be directly involved in reporting land transactions involving foreign entities. The impact of foreign ownership on counties and local communities has continued to receive significant national media attention over the past ten years.

Despite the legislative attention being paid to this issue at the federal and state levels, major agriculture and forestry stakeholder groups have largely declined to take a stance on limits on foreign ownership. Nevertheless, the issue is being hotly debated in Congress, specifically as a part of broader national security discussions, and will likely be addressed in some way in the 2024 Farm Bill.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Foreign holdings account for 3.4 percent of all U.S. agricultural land, with Chinese holdings accounting for less than one percent of total foreign-owned agricultural land. However, total acreage of foreign-owned agricultural land has risen sharply over the last decade, particularly for Chinese-associated holdings.
  • While USDA is required to track foreign ownership and investments in agricultural land, there are no federal restrictions on foreign agricultural land ownership. 24 states have put restrictions on foreign ownership of agricultural land in place, and more are currently considering them.
  • Congress is paying increasing attention to the question of foreign agricultural land ownership. The FY 2024 Agriculture-FDA Appropriations Bill included a provision strengthening reporting requirements for land transactions involving foreign entities and are likely to address the issue in the 2024 Farm Bill.

Read More

Related News

USDA Building
Advocacy

U.S. Department of Agriculture announces reorganization

On July 24, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced a major reorganization of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) that will relocate thousands of federal employees, restructure regional offices and consolidate administrative services and operations. The changes are expected to reduce USDA’s footprint in Washington, D.C. and shift more personnel to regional hubs across the country. 

Molly Pyle, from the Center on Rural Innovation, describes her organization’s pillars for entrepreneurship success to the Rural Action Cacus July 12. Photo by Salvador Farfan
County News

Character strengths set rural counties up for entrepreneurship

Rural counties should not be written off as cradles of technology-driven entrepreneurship and the job growth that could follow in its wake.

Image of Capitol-closeup_2.jpg
Advocacy

Senate Agriculture Committee releases reconciliation budget text; Contains changes to SNAP

On June 24, the Senate parliamentarian approved a new version of the benefit cost share provision. Under this revision, states may use either their FY 2025 or FY 2026 payment error rate to determine their required match for FY 2028. For FY 2029 and beyond, the match is based on the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior.