NACo Election Administration Resource Hub for Counties

Upcoming Events
Related News
The resource hub connect county officials with existing resources and FAQs and best practices on election administration.
Jump to Section
In most states, county governments play a key role in administrating federal, state and local elections. While specific laws and ways of administering elections vary from state to state, county officials rely on assistance from state, federal and nonprofit partners to ensure elections are secure and voters can cast their ballots with ease.
The following resource hub is intended to connect county officials with toolkits, grant opportunities and other resources on election administration; address Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) related to election administration; and highlight county best practices.
Section 1
Election Administration Resource Library for Counties
Federal Partners
U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
The EAC is a bipartisan, independent federal commission that was established to help officials meet election administration guidelines set forth by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). Comprised of 4 commissioners (2 from each political party), the EAC provides counties and the public with election-related topics, develops voluntary voting system guidelines, and acts as the national clearinghouse for election administration information.
The EAC is also the main source of federal grants for election administration activities as authorized by HAVA. Currently, election security grants are the primary form of funding available to counties under the law. More information on election security grants in your state can be found on the County Explorer tool.
- Election Security Grants are the main source of federal funding to improve election administration, technology and security
- A running list of election security resources compiled by the EAC for all things election security, including resources for voters, non-voting tech, procurement, cybersecurity, election audits and best practices
- A Communications 101 toolkit with information on communicating with the public and how to plan for issues that may arise. There's also a five video training series.
- An interactive map showing state election policy data, plus links to state and local offices and voting information in each of the 50 states and territories
- An AI toolkit with an overview of relevant generative artificial intelligence tools, their impacts on election administration and how to approach AI-generated content
- Election security resources, such as the Secure Elections Toolkit, for communicating to the public information regarding election security
- Glossary of election terminology with key terms and phrases used in the administration of elections. The glossary is also available in several languages.
- Accessibility video training series, which promotes ways to improve physical accessibility as well as the accessibility of websites and communications
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is responsible for our nation’s public security, including anti-terrorism effots, cybersecurity and disaster prevention. DHS houses the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) that works with both public and private partners to ensure cybersecurity and physical security of critical infrastructure, including election infrastructure. In recent years, CISA has also provided resources on election security and disinformation and misinformation.
DHS provides some federal funding for election security through the Homeland Security Preparedness Grants.
- Homeland Security Preparedness Grants (HSPG) provides funding for state, local and tribal governments to prevent and respond to terrorism and other emergencies. Counties must apply for HSPG funds through their State Administrative Agency, the primary recipients of these funds. A minimum amount of grant funding must be dedicated toward six national priority areas.
- “Enhancing election security” has been considered a national priority area since federal Fiscal Year 2023, and as such, 3% of a state’s award must go towards election security.
Most DHS resources for elections come from CISA, which provides cybersecurity and infrastructure protection. PLEASE NOTE: On March 11, CISA announced a $10 million funding cut to the Center for Internet Security (CIS), which is no longer supporting election security initiatives in partnership with the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).
- A cybersecurity toolkit to help protect elections with tools and resources to improve cybersecurity and cyber resilience, such as accessing risk and protecting information
- The Election Security Resource Library provides materials on physical security checklists, prevention practices, cybersecurity, operational risk information and election security services
- The report "Generative AI and the 2024 Election Cycle" gives an overview of generative AI and its unique risks associated with election security
- The Election Infrastructure Security Resource Guide provides assessments, trainings and services provided by CISA on election security
- CISA has election security Resources for Law Enforcement that offers guidance on risk mitigation and gives trainings and exercises on how law enforcement can better address election threats and security
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
The U.S. Department of Justice oversees the enforcement of federal laws and the administration of justice, including enforcing election laws and partnering with state and local law enforcement officials to prosecute election crimes. Some DOJ state and local assistance grant funds can be used on election worker protection activities.
- The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, which is primarily focused on criminal justice funding, was expanded in 2022 to include protecting election workers
- An FBI Election Threats Task Force was established and led by the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section to address violence and threats against election workers. The current status of the task force is unknown.
- Note: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded the foreign influence task force, which was created following the 2016 election and Russian hack into the DNC email system, to “free resources to address more pressing priorities”
U.S. Postal Service
The U.S. Postal Service plays a critical role in elections by handling election mail.
- Election mail includes ballots, voter registration cards and absentee voting applications
- The 2024 Official Election Mail Kit includes resources on election mail, reminders and recommendations
U.S. Congress
The Election Observer Program sends designated election observers to monitor congressional elections, particularly those with tight races and potential to be contested. The program is codified by the Congressional Observer Access Act of 2024, or HR 6513.
Election observer laws vary by state, view each state’s policies here.
External/Non-Federal Partners
NASS is a membership organization for secretaries of state. One of the most vital roles that secretaries of state (and lieutenant governors) play is that of chief election official.
- Find the Chief State Election Official in your state
- Created by NASS, these briefings cover security and administration
The membership organization for state election directors offers several election resources.
- Find the individual(s) who help administer election-related materials using NASED's Find State Election Director tool
- The organization also offers an election communications toolkit with social media graphics, videos in English and Spanish, and tip sheets
The center is a membership organization for individuals who work in election administration
- The Standards of Conduct for Election & Registration Officials toolkit
- The Journal of Election Administration, Research & Practice is a biannual e-journal published in partnership with the Auburn University Election Administration Initiative. It addresses concerns in election administration.
- The center offers Election Consulting, which provides professional solutions to election officials to improve the methods of daily operation in conducting elections and voter registration.
A membership organization for local government clerks, election officials, recorders and treasurers. Learn more.
The membership organization represents state legislatures.
- The 2025 State Elections Legislation Database tracks state legislation related to election administration weekly
- Find NCSL State Liaisons here
- Read Election Conversations, which are interviews conducted by NCSL’s Elections and Redistricting team of a local election official or legislative election leader
This is a coalition of election officials and law enforcement officials focused on protecting election workers and voters from threats or violence.
- The Law Enforcement Quick Reference Guides provide key provisions found in each state
- Five Steps to Safer Elections is a how-to guide on improving cooperation between law enforcement and election officials
- The committee also offers videos on increasing trust and threats against officials
The group works with local and state election offices and nonprofits on advancing election administration.
- The Election Communications Plan is a 60-day plan that includes templates, tips and PSAs
- Chain of Custody is a guide on how to mitigate, identify and solve breaches in ballot security
- The Communications Resource Desk provides free to low-cost help on communications-related work, from graphic design to crisis communication
- De-escalation Resources include a pocket guide and posters with tips and reminders for dealing with situations that may arise at voting places
- The Elections Group offers other resources that include templates, guides and workbooks, case studies, and articles on election-related materials
Section 2
Frequently Asked Questions on the County Role in Elections
Who is responsible for the administration of elections at the county level?
It varies state by state, but most states have an elected constitutional/row officer, such as a county clerk or recorder, while others have election directors that are appointed by the county’s chief executive official or legislative board. All counties employ teams made up of hired staff and/or seasonal workers and volunteers to administer elections in their communities. Fifteen states use a single election official model where election administrations are managed by one individual, either appointed or elected. In seven states, a county board is responsible for election administration and acts as the chief county election authority. Twenty-six states use a mixture of local board of elections and two or more individuals. Counties oversee election administration in 36 states, six states have a shared county and municipality responsibility, four states have no county role in elections and two states implement a different system. Alaska has state oversight, and Delaware is state managed, county implemented.
How are elections funded?
It is a mix of federal, state and local funds. In some cases, philanthropic grant funding is also utilized, although 27 states have prohibited, limited or regulated this form of funding as of the end of 2023. Counties often pay for county-level races, while states cover state and federal races. Election administration costs are covered by both county and state funds in 21 states; by either the state, municipality or county in 13 states; by county and municipality in 9 states; by municipality and the state in three states; and by state-only funds in two states.
What federal funds are available to assist counties with election administration responsibilities?
Help America Vote Act (HAVA) grant programs are the main source of federal funding. States must submit a request with a proposed budget and description of how funds will be used. The grants available: the Election Security Grant, which provides funding to improve election administration, election security and election technology; Section 251 Requirement Payments, which provides funding for states to carry out HAVA requirements; and the Homeland Security Grant Program, which is available for improving election infrastructure -- both physical security and cybersecurity ($1.008 billion was allocated for fiscal year 2024). Since 2022, the Department of Justice has also allowed funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program, which supports law enforcement and criminal justice initiatives, to be used to protect election workers from violence and threats.
Are private grants allowed to assist in election administration?
No. There may be cases in which a polling place has WiFi accessibility, but this does not mean that voting machines or systems are connected to the internet. Some counties allow ballot scanners to be connected to private networks; however, in most states it is against the law for voting machines to be connected to the internet.
What measures do counties have in place to ensure the physical security and integrity of our elections?
Security measures vary based on state law and specific voting systems. Counties ensure election security by upholding voter ID requirements and following common best practices such as the use of security cameras, locks, audits and cybersecurity testing for voting machines. There is a strict chain-of-custody procedure to ensure ballot security, including limiting the number of individuals who can access ballots and secure storage of them to allow for audits or recounts. Cybersecurity measures are increasingly important in ensuring election integrity. These include encryption, multifactor authentication and monitoring systems for suspicious activity. Cybersecurity testing for voting machines is not required, but many counties have several cybersecurity measures in place and 48 states have a post-election audit to ensure the equipment worked correctly during voting.
Is critical election equipment, such as voting machines and poll books, connected to the internet?
No. There may be cases in which a polling place has WiFi accessibility, but this does not mean that voting machines or systems are connected to the internet. Some counties allow ballot scanners to be connected to private networks; however, in most states it is against the law for voting machines to be connected to the internet.
How do county election offices prevent voter fraud, such as an individual voting more than once or in the name of a deceased person?
County election offices have a multifaceted process in place to prevent voter fraud that varies by each state. Generally, counties ensure that current and accurate voter rolls are maintained, which includes collaborating with other states to compare and update registration and voting records. In most states, voting more than once is a felony. In instances where voter eligibility cannot be verified, they may be allowed to vote by a provisional ballot, which will only be processed and counted should the voter’s eligibility be verified.
How can I learn more about election administration or participate in the process within my community?
There are many ways to learn about election administration, including online resources provided by NACo, the Election Assistance Commission and other organizations. Local elections offices will have county-specific information. The Election Center also offers a CERA Certification course on election administration training and information. Participating in workshops, webinars and community events hosted by local and national nonprofits may be a great way to both learn about and participate in the process. Becoming a poll watcher or worker is another way to be involved.
Why does it take some counties longer to report election results than others?
This varies by jurisdiction, but is largely due to several factors: (1) state laws prohibiting the processing/tabulation of ballots until after the polls close on election night; (2) lack of resources to help expedite the processing/tabulation of ballots, such as ballot tabulators; or (3) mail ballots casted closer to Election Day may arrive days after polls close on election night.
Are the results on election night “official”?
Ultimately, the initial results posted on election night are unofficial and are typically reported as ballots are processed and tabulated. In some states, early and mail-in votes are already processed and tabulated by Election Day and reported as soon as polls close. However, state laws and resource constraints may require counties days to complete ballot processing and tabulating. In these cases, reported results may not be final for several days following Election Day. In total, each of these circumstances may lead to instances where results reported on election night do not reflect the final outcome of a race. Only election officials issuing election certification can provide official results.
Section 3
County Best Practices in Election Administration
The following county-level best practices have been curated from past NACo Achievement Award and EAC Clearinghouse Award winners.
Snohomish County, Wash.
Snohomish County, Wash.
Distinguished Voter Education and Communications Initiatives, 2023 U.S. EAC Clearinghouse Award
Unleashing the Storytelling Power of Comic Book Art to Engage and Inform Voters: The county created a comic book series for voter education, covering topics from voter registration to tabulating results. Using visuals and comic book-style art can simplify complex information. This style was further incorporated into all communications, allowing voters to recognize which materials were from Snohomish County Elections.
Maricopa County, Ariz.
Maricopa County, Ariz.
Best in Civic Education and Public Information, 2023 NACo Achievement Award Winner
The county formed an Elections Command Center that was made up of six elected officials and a team of elections professionals to serve as the central source for election-related information. The center held 16 press conferences, over 600 reporter interviews and responded to more than 500 media outlets.
Hamilton County, Ohio
Hamilton County, Ohio
Outstanding Innovations in Elections, 2022 EAC Clearinghouse Award
The county was recognized for its Behind the Ballot Tours, where tours of the Board of Elections office and warehouse were given to show election administration processes, such as conducting audits and testing voter equipment accuracy. Increased confidence in elections and election integrity were reported after the tour.
Anne Arundel County, Md.
Anne Arundel County, Md
Outstanding Innovation in Election Cybersecurity and Technology, 2022 EAC Clearinghouse Award
The county was recognized for its Mail-in Ballot Sorting, Scanning and Timestamping Project, where a process was developed to sort, scan, time stamp and receive mail-in ballots with the Tritek Sorting machine. The project increased efficiency and ballot security.
Weber County, Utah
Weber County, Utah
Outstanding Innovations in Elections Administration, 2018 EAC Clearinghouse Award
Their “Winning in Weber” program engages the community in elections. Programs include civic lessons at local schools, story hour with children and engaging students at Weber State University in elections.