Supreme Court Preview for Local Governments: 2024-2025 Term
This webinar is available on-demand. If you have trouble accessing the recording, please email nacomeetings@naco.org.
Hosted by the Local Government Legal Center (LGLC), join legal experts in a discussion of the new Supreme Court term and what decisions local governments should watch. The Supreme Court will rule on several major cases this term, including issues related to:
- The Clean Water Act
- So-called "ghost guns"
- Title VII Claims and "majority discrimination"
- Fourth Amendment claims and the "Moment of Threat" doctrine
- The Fair Labor Standards Act, and
- ADA claims involving post-retirement health benefits
Several other cases on the Court's docket may impact local governments' finances and obligations under various federal statutes.
The Local Government Legal Center (LGLC) is a coalition of national local government organizations formed in 2023 by the National Association of Counties (NACo), National League of Cities (NLC) and International Municipal Lawyers Association (IMLA) to provide education to local governments regarding the Supreme Court and its impact on local governments and local officials and to advocate for local governments at the Supreme Court in appropriate cases. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and International City/County Management Association (ICMA) are associate members. Visit the Local Government Legal Center to learn more.
This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only. Please note that members of the Local Government Legal Center will not provide Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credits for participation in or completion of this material.
Watch Recording
Click here to access the recording in a new window.
Speakers
Amanda Karras
Meaghan VerGow
Aileen M. McGrath
NACo Legal Advocacy: Jouppi v. Alaska
On July 20, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Jouppi v. Alaska (25-246), a case that could affect how state and local governments impose and defend fines and property forfeitures under the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause.
NACo Legal Advocacy: St. Mary’s Catholic Parish v. Roy
The U.S. Supreme Court is deciding how easily a challenger can move a neutral local rule out of deferential review and into the most demanding standard in Constitutional law.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Grand v. City University Heights
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether federal courts may hear certain religious liberty challenges to local zoning decisions before the local land use process reaches a final decision.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Suncor Energy v. Boulder County
NACo joined a Supreme Court amicus brief arguing that federal law should not prevent counties from pursuing state-law claims to recover costs associated with local harms.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Chatrie v. United States
On January 16, 2026, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Chatrie v. United States which asks the court if and when the collection of data through geofencing constitutes a violation of search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. It specifically focuses on whether the execution of a geofence warrant, issued by a judge and directing a third-party provider to disclose location history data for devices present near the scene of a crime during a limited time window, constitutes an unreasonable search.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Monsanto Company v. Durnell
Monsanto v. Durnell considers a preemption issue that carries substantial implications for counties.