EPA finalizes new Waters of the U.S. definition

Image of GettyImages-1073514644.jpg

Key Takeaways

On January 23, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) finalized a new “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) definition to replace the 2015 WOTUS rule issued under the Obama Administration. The announcement comes two years after President Trump signed an executive order directing the EPA to withdraw and rewrite the controversial 2015 rule. The rule goes into effect on 60 days after being published in the federal register.

The new definition creates four categories of regulated waters and includes 12 exemptions. The four categories of WOTUS include:

  1. Territorial seas and traditional navigable waters
  2. Tributaries
  3. Lakes, ponds and impoundments of jurisdictional waters
  4. Adjacent wetlands

The rule specifies that if water does not meet one of the four listed categories, it will not be considered a WOTUS and clarifies that certain other waters will also no longer be considered a WOTUS. These exemptions include:

  1. Waterbodies that are not included in the four WOTUS categories
  2. Groundwater
  3. Ephemeral features
  4. Diffuse stormwater run-off and directional sheet flow over upland
  5. Certain ditches
  6. Prior converted cropland
  7. Artificially irrigated areas
  8. Artificial lakes and ponds
  9. Water-filled depressions
  10. Stormwater control features
  11. Groundwater recharge, water reuse and water recycling structures
  12. Waste treatment systems

NACo is working on a detailed analysis of the rule and will continue to track WOTUS activity. Click here to view EPA’s fact sheet on the new rule.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The term WOTUS has been around since 1899 when it was added to the Rivers and Harbors Act, which is the initial authority for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) permit program in “navigable” waters. In 1972, WOTUS was added to the Clean Water Act (CWA) to differentiate which waters fall under federal versus state authority. Since its inclusion in the Act, the definition has been redefined several times. In the 2000’s, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two WOTUS related cases which caused further confusion about the scope of WOTUS in the field. As a result, more counties and other stakeholders had to obtain CWA Section 404 permits for some construction and maintenance projects, which can be costly, time-consuming and complex.

Consequently, in June 2015, the Obama Administration finalized a controversial new definition for WOTUS. NACo expressed concerns about the final rule because it would increase federal jurisdiction over road, bridges, flood control channels and ditch construction and maintenance projects. Almost immediately after the rule was finalized, numerous lawsuits were filed in the district and appeals courts.

Since President Trump’s 2018 executive order, EPA has been drafting a new WOTUS definition. In February 2019, EPA and the Army Corp released the Trump Administration’s proposed new WOTUS definition. In response to the proposed definition, in April 2019, NACo submitted two sets of comment letters. The first letter, with the National League of Cities and the U.S. Conference of Mayors, highlighted the opportunities and challenges that counties, cities and mayors potentially face. The second letter was exclusively focused on counties and went into greater detail on how the rule could potentially impact county-owned infrastructure. It also offered recommendations to the agencies.

On September 12, the Trump Administration released a final rule to repeal the 2015 “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) definition and reinstate the pre-2015 WOTUS definition from 1986, which is currently in effect.

Related News

Cooling towers byron IL
Advocacy

White House signs executive orders to advance nuclear power

On May 23, President Trump signed four executive orders focused on expanding the nuclear energy industry. The executive orders aim to position nuclear power as a key contributor to energy reliability, economic growth and national security — especially as artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing and military operations increase demand for stable, high-density power sources. 

Image of supreme court.jpg
Advocacy

U.S. Supreme Court issues unanimous decision in landmark National Environmental Policy Act case

On May 29, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado that will reshape requirements for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environment impact statements. 

Greg Brophy, Colorado director of the Western Way, addresses the WIR Board of Directors. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Interest in energy generation builds in the West

Counties are exploring the potential for energy generation on their public lands, but local control will set the stage for a tradeoff.