In symbolic vote, House passes resolution to repeal WOTUS

Image of shutterstock_232480576v2.png

On Jan. 13, the U.S. House of Representatives easily passed a resolution of disapproval (Senate Joint Resolution 22) that would repeal the revised “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) rule by a vote of 253–166. The same resolution was passed by the Senate in November by a vote of 53–44.

S.J.Res.22 uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to kill the WOTUS rule and prohibits EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers from using any “substantially similar” provisions in future WOTUS rule-makings.  The CRA is a rare procedural move that allows Congress to overturn any “major” federal rule through a resolution of disapproval and requires a presidential signature for enactment. The CRA has only been used once successfully — in 2001 to overturn a Department of Labor ergonomics rule.  NACo has no official position on S.J.Res.22.

The bill will now be sent to the White House for review. But the Administration has already indicated it would veto S.J.Res.22, and at this point, neither chamber can override the expected veto. That returns the game to the courts over the next several months. Court decisions questioning the WOTUS rule may give momentum to movement on Capitol Hill.

In December 2015, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on whether it has the authority to hear the case—its decision is expected within several months. In the meantime, the court temporarily halted implementation of the Waters of the U.S. rule nationally until its jurisdiction could be determined.

In a separate development, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the Department of Justice’s request to consolidate other WOTUS lawsuits filed separately in district court against EPA and the Corps.

These developments only increase the complexity because it remains unclear whether challenges to the rule will ultimately be heard in circuit or district courts. This will likely lengthen the timeframe of the rule’s judicial proceedings and highlights the need for a legislative fix.

Twelve House Democrats and 241 Republicans voted in support of S.J.Res.22. Only one Republican and 165 Democrats voted against.

Attachments

Related News

2165857864
Advocacy

U.S. Senators introduce bipartisan comprehensive permitting reform package with major county wins

On Sep. 30, the leaders of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (S. 5653), a comprehensive, bipartisan permitting reform package that would make major changes to several federal environmental protection statutes.

Hemphill County, Texas Judge Lisa Johnson (left) and Cochran County, Texas Judge Pat Henry listen to a discussion about philanthropic organizations managing community benefit agreements. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Foundations navigate community benefit agreements

Philanthropic organizations offer a specialized approach to managing proceeds from community benefit agreements struck between counties and energy companies.

Carson County, Texas Judge Dan Looten (center) talks to Hodgeman County, Kan. Commissioner Mike Schraeder about wind power during a visit to the Panhandle Wind Project Development in Carson County. To the right, El Paso County, Texas Senior Policy Analyst Ramon Bracamontes take a photo of a nearby wind turbine. Photo by Charlie Ban
County News

Texas symposium spurs energy talks

The road to domestic energy independence will be paved and maintained by counties, and more than 100 county leaders came to the Texas panhandle to learn how to make the most of the opportunity.