Supreme Court won't hear Utah public lands access case

Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
County NewsThe Supreme Court won't hear Utah case on county right-of-way on federal lands.Supreme Court won't hear Utah public lands access case
-
County News Article
Supreme Court won't hear Utah public lands access case
Share
Line:@NACoTweets: Supreme Court won't hear Utah case on county right-of-way on federal lands
The Supreme Court has rejected pleas to take up a case surrounding claims to Utah roads that cut across federal lands, a move that could have broad implications for ongoing disputes in the West.
In a customary short order issued Oct. 13, the high court denied petitions from the state of Utah and Kane County — which lies along the state’s southern border — to hear their appeal on a case centering on the county’s rights-of-way claims made under an obscure Civil War-era law.
A federal appeals court last year scaled back the scope of the county’s right-of-way claims to roads on federally-owned land, finding that a lower court had erred in part of its decision awarding the county access to 12 of 15 roads it claimed under the 1866 law known as R.S. 2477.
That law was enacted to allow state and county highways to be constructed over federal lands in the West. Congress repealed the law in 1976, but it said rights in place before that repeal must be honored.
In the decision last year from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the judges said the lower court did not have jurisdiction over six of the roads it awarded to Kane County because there was no “disputed title” necessary to involve the federal courts
That decision will have ramifications for the state’s broader claims over some 12,000 roads, attorneys for Utah said in their petition to the Supreme Court. “This case seeks to resolve disputed title ownership to historic highways forged by those who long ago traveled West to establish homes and livelihoods,” they said, “and that even today remain essential to state and local economies.”
The 10th Circuit’s decision, Utah’s petition says, put states and others seeking rights of way in a legal “no man’s land,” preventing county improvement and state maintenance of roads.
Attorneys for the Obama administration had urged the high court not to take on the case.
Conservation groups have fought state and county claims to some of the routes in question.
“Lots of these claims are in sensitive places, so having these federal agencies in charge of time, place, manner of any improvements of these routes is important,” said Steve Bloch, an attorney at the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which has opposed state claims in a number of lawsuits.
And Utah isn’t the only state where these fights are occurring, Bloch said. “It’s playing out in some other states like Alaska, Idaho, Colorado and New Mexico,” he said.
States and counties could use their right-of-way claims to improve and widen routes including what are now unmaintained dirt tracks or stream bottoms in areas like national parks or wilderness areas, Bloch added.
Some of the roads Kane County has claimed, for example, run through the Grand Staircase- Escalante National Monument.
Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net. 202.628.6500
The Supreme Court won't hear Utah case on county right-of-way on federal lands.2015-11-02County News Article2018-06-01
Share | @NACoTweets: Supreme Court won't hear Utah case on county right-of-way on federal lands |
The Supreme Court has rejected pleas to take up a case surrounding claims to Utah roads that cut across federal lands, a move that could have broad implications for ongoing disputes in the West.
In a customary short order issued Oct. 13, the high court denied petitions from the state of Utah and Kane County — which lies along the state’s southern border — to hear their appeal on a case centering on the county’s rights-of-way claims made under an obscure Civil War-era law.
A federal appeals court last year scaled back the scope of the county’s right-of-way claims to roads on federally-owned land, finding that a lower court had erred in part of its decision awarding the county access to 12 of 15 roads it claimed under the 1866 law known as R.S. 2477.
That law was enacted to allow state and county highways to be constructed over federal lands in the West. Congress repealed the law in 1976, but it said rights in place before that repeal must be honored.
In the decision last year from the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the judges said the lower court did not have jurisdiction over six of the roads it awarded to Kane County because there was no “disputed title” necessary to involve the federal courts
That decision will have ramifications for the state’s broader claims over some 12,000 roads, attorneys for Utah said in their petition to the Supreme Court. “This case seeks to resolve disputed title ownership to historic highways forged by those who long ago traveled West to establish homes and livelihoods,” they said, “and that even today remain essential to state and local economies.”
The 10th Circuit’s decision, Utah’s petition says, put states and others seeking rights of way in a legal “no man’s land,” preventing county improvement and state maintenance of roads.
Attorneys for the Obama administration had urged the high court not to take on the case.
Conservation groups have fought state and county claims to some of the routes in question.
“Lots of these claims are in sensitive places, so having these federal agencies in charge of time, place, manner of any improvements of these routes is important,” said Steve Bloch, an attorney at the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which has opposed state claims in a number of lawsuits.
And Utah isn’t the only state where these fights are occurring, Bloch said. “It’s playing out in some other states like Alaska, Idaho, Colorado and New Mexico,” he said.
States and counties could use their right-of-way claims to improve and widen routes including what are now unmaintained dirt tracks or stream bottoms in areas like national parks or wilderness areas, Bloch added.
Some of the roads Kane County has claimed, for example, run through the Grand Staircase- Escalante National Monument.
Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net. 202.628.6500
Hero 1
-
Policy Brief
Provide Full Mandatory Funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Program
Urge your members of Congress to support mandatory full funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program. Because local governments are unable to tax the property values or products derived from federal lands, PILT payments are necessary to support essential local government services. Unless Congress acts, counties will have received their last fully funded PILT disbursement in 2022. Without mandatory full funding, PILT will remain a discretionary program (subject to the annual appropriations process) and could fall back to pre-2008 funding levels, which would devastate local government service delivery in areas with significant federal land ownership. -
Policy Brief
Support Continued Revenue Sharing Payments to National Forest Counties
Urge your members of Congress to enact a long-term legislative solution for continued revenue sharing payments to forest counties through the U.S. Forest Service’s Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program. Congress reauthorized SRS and removed the annual 5 percent funding reduction through FY 2023 in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (P.L. 117-58) enacted on November 15, 2021. Counties rely on SRS payments to provide numerous critical services including infrastructure, conservation projects, search and rescue missions and fire prevention programs. -
Blog
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists the lesser prairie-chicken under the Endangered Species Act
On November 25, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued two final rules listing two Distinct Population Segments of the lesser prairie-chicken under the Endangered Species Act. -
Blog
President Biden declares Camp Hale-Continental Divide a National Monument
On October 12, President Biden traveled to Red Cliff, Colo. to sign the declaration designating Camp Hale and Tenmile Range as a national monument. The monument designation includes not only Camp Hale and the Tenmile Range, but ten mountain peaks over 13,000 feet in elevation. -
Blog
Treasury releases Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund payments to eligible counties
The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced the release of Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund (LATCF) payments to counties. -
County News
County officials hear from Forest Service, Interior representatives
Intergovernmental partnerships are crucial in public lands management.
-
Basic page
Public Lands Steering Committee
All matters relating to federally-owned public lands including federal land management programs, natural resource revenue sharing payments, payments in lieu of taxes, and property tax immunity concerns.pagepagepage<p>All matters relating to federally-owned public lands including federal land management programs, natural resource revenue sharing payments, payments in lieu of taxes, and property tax immunity concerns.
Contact
-
E&E Reporter
Related Resources
-
Blog
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists the lesser prairie-chicken under the Endangered Species Act
On November 25, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued two final rules listing two Distinct Population Segments of the lesser prairie-chicken under the Endangered Species Act. -
Blog
President Biden declares Camp Hale-Continental Divide a National Monument
On October 12, President Biden traveled to Red Cliff, Colo. to sign the declaration designating Camp Hale and Tenmile Range as a national monument. The monument designation includes not only Camp Hale and the Tenmile Range, but ten mountain peaks over 13,000 feet in elevation. -
Blog
Treasury releases Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund payments to eligible counties
The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced the release of Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund (LATCF) payments to counties.
-
Policy Brief
Provide Full Mandatory Funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Program
Urge your members of Congress to support mandatory full funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program. Because local governments are unable to tax the property values or products derived from federal lands, PILT payments are necessary to support essential local government services. Unless Congress acts, counties will have received their last fully funded PILT disbursement in 2022. Without mandatory full funding, PILT will remain a discretionary program (subject to the annual appropriations process) and could fall back to pre-2008 funding levels, which would devastate local government service delivery in areas with significant federal land ownership. -
Policy Brief
Support Continued Revenue Sharing Payments to National Forest Counties
Urge your members of Congress to enact a long-term legislative solution for continued revenue sharing payments to forest counties through the U.S. Forest Service’s Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program. Congress reauthorized SRS and removed the annual 5 percent funding reduction through FY 2023 in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (P.L. 117-58) enacted on November 15, 2021. Counties rely on SRS payments to provide numerous critical services including infrastructure, conservation projects, search and rescue missions and fire prevention programs. -
Video
Implementing the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law: Restoring Healthy Ecosystems
Learn about efforts to implement the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to restore healthy ecosystems, reduce the threat of and mitigate the effect from wildland fire, safeguard water supplies, and ensure greater access to federal public lands.
More From
-
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Inflation Reduction Act
The IRA offers counties the opportunity to pursue clean energy initiatives and reduce emissions through new competitive grant programs, local resiliency investments and clean energy tax credits.
Learn More