Proposed legislation to stop mass shootings calls for identifying behavioral threats
Could identifying and investigating disturbing behavior stop mass shootings?
That’s the premise behind bipartisan legislation proposed in Congress by Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) and Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.).
Members of NACo’s Justice and Public Safety Steering Committee heard about the proposed legislation, the Threat Assessment, Prevention and Safety Act or TAPS (H.R. 838) Act, Saturday morning during the first day of NACo’s 2020 Legislative Conference. (A Senate companion bill is S. 265.)
“The strategy of ‘it won’t happen here’ doesn’t work anymore,” Steve Janushkowsky, legislative director for Babin, told NACo members. “Nothing ends up being accomplished.”
A conversation with one constituent of Babin’s inspired the proposed legislation aimed at curtailing mass shootings, Janushkowsky said.
“Nobody just snaps,” said Lauren Ziegler, senior legislative assistant in Babin’s office. “One of the problems we’re finding…say this information comes to a co-worker, there’s not really an avenue for ‘What do we do?’ There’s this gray area.”
“We need to find a way to fill the void,” she said. “It’s about patterns of concerning behavior. You can look at risk factors.”
“That’s something we should all advocate for,” said steering committee member Sally Heyman, commissioner, Miami-Dade County.
Later in the day, steering committee members passed a proposed interim policy resolution backing the proposed legislation.
Attachments
Related News
Congress advances Second Chance Act reauthorization
On December 4, the Senate passed the Second Chance Reauthorization Act (S.4477) by unanimous consent, a major milestone for supporting county reentry programs. NACo supports this legislation, which would reauthorize funding for Second Chance Act programs for five years.
NACo Legal Advocacy: City of Seattle et al. v. Kia/Hyundai
The question at hand in City of Seattle et al. v. Kia/Hyundai is whether or not the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard preempts state tort claims brought forth by local governments alleging that Kia and Hyundai’s failure to install “reasonable” anti-theft technology constitutes negligence and public nuisance.
NACo Legal Advocacy: Perttu v. Richards
Perttu v. Richards has implications on the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and could increase the amount of Section 1983 inmate-initiated cases against county jails that reach federal court, ultimately resulting in counties having to expend resources on frivolous lawsuits.