A Best Practice from the Government Finance Officers Association: Performance Measures

Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
County NewsGFOA recommends all organizations identify, track and communicate performance measures to monitor financial and budgetary status, service delivery, program outcomes and community conditions. When identifying performance measurements, governments should focus on making sure that measures meet the following conditions:A Best Practice from the Government Finance Officers Association: Performance MeasuresOctober 29, 2018October 29, 2018, 1:30 pm
-
County News Article
A Best Practice from the Government Finance Officers Association: Performance Measures
GFOA recommends all organizations identify, track and communicate performance measures to monitor financial and budgetary status, service delivery, program outcomes and community conditions.
When identifying performance measurements, governments should focus on making sure that measures meet the following conditions:
- Useful — measures should provide information that is helpful to decision-making, understanding or accountability efforts.
- Relevant — measures can be clearly linked to the service delivery/program outcomes they are intended to measure, are appropriate for the outcome being measured and are readily understandable.
- Reliable — collection methods and measure definitions need to be understood so stakeholders can rely on the information.
- Adequate — an appropriate variety of measures are used to measure performance and the measures do not incentivize behavior that adversely affects the measures such as a quantity versus quality scenario. There is often not a single measure that can provide sufficient context and understanding.
- Collectible — measures are readily available and do not involve excessive time/effort to collect.
- Consistent — measures can be regularly collected to track outcomes over time and avoid need to continuously identify new measures.
- Environment — measures include variables related to external factors that impact service delivery and program performance.
- Responsibility — clearly identify responsibilities for collection, storage and dissemination of the data
- Systems — existing data collection capacities are leveraged appropriately or new systems are identified to ease the burden of data collection.
- When communicating performance measures internally ensure the following:
- Expectations — clearly communicate how performance measures will be utilized in decision-making and across all levels of the organization.
- Purpose — emphasize that performance measures are used to inform decisions and facilitate improvement and understanding. Governments should be careful to avoid performance measures that are collected to simply show achievement for the purpose of soliciting recognition or rewards.
- Similarly, less than favorable outcomes should be evaluated to understand the root cause of the issue and avoid quick punitive actions as this will make accurate data collection efforts more difficult in the future.
- Clarity — clearly articulate the performance measures, including both expected results or targets and actual results.
- Data Integrity — the source of the data and how the data is interpreted or used to draw conclusions should be clearly and fairly articulated.
- Context — provide background on why these particular performance measures were chosen, such as cost, timeliness, availability, etc.
- Production — reference sources of performance measures and how the measures were collected.
- Dissemination — ensure performance measures are distributed throughout all levels of the organization and are made readily available.
- When communicating performance measures externally, the following items should be addressed to ensure measures are readily available and accessible:
- Delivery — how and where will the performance measures be communicated?
- Audience — identify who the primary audience will be.
- Format — what is the best way to present the information?
- Frequency — how often will the performance measures be communicated/updated?
- Clarity — explain the exact source of the data, how the calculations were conducted and why, what the performance measures show, both expected results and actual results.
- Context — provide background on why these particular performance measures were chosen, why, if any target measures were set and why, and what the results mean to operations, service levels, or community outcomes.
Best Practices on Performance Measurements was published by the Government Finance Officers Association and excerpted with permission.
GFOA recommends all organizations identify, track and communicate performance measures to monitor financial and budgetary status, service delivery, program outcomes and community conditions.2018-10-29County News Article2018-10-31
GFOA recommends all organizations identify, track and communicate performance measures to monitor financial and budgetary status, service delivery, program outcomes and community conditions.
When identifying performance measurements, governments should focus on making sure that measures meet the following conditions:
- Useful — measures should provide information that is helpful to decision-making, understanding or accountability efforts.
- Relevant — measures can be clearly linked to the service delivery/program outcomes they are intended to measure, are appropriate for the outcome being measured and are readily understandable.
- Reliable — collection methods and measure definitions need to be understood so stakeholders can rely on the information.
- Adequate — an appropriate variety of measures are used to measure performance and the measures do not incentivize behavior that adversely affects the measures such as a quantity versus quality scenario. There is often not a single measure that can provide sufficient context and understanding.
- Collectible — measures are readily available and do not involve excessive time/effort to collect.
- Consistent — measures can be regularly collected to track outcomes over time and avoid need to continuously identify new measures.
- Environment — measures include variables related to external factors that impact service delivery and program performance.
- Responsibility — clearly identify responsibilities for collection, storage and dissemination of the data
- Systems — existing data collection capacities are leveraged appropriately or new systems are identified to ease the burden of data collection.
- When communicating performance measures internally ensure the following:
- Expectations — clearly communicate how performance measures will be utilized in decision-making and across all levels of the organization.
- Purpose — emphasize that performance measures are used to inform decisions and facilitate improvement and understanding. Governments should be careful to avoid performance measures that are collected to simply show achievement for the purpose of soliciting recognition or rewards.
- Similarly, less than favorable outcomes should be evaluated to understand the root cause of the issue and avoid quick punitive actions as this will make accurate data collection efforts more difficult in the future.
- Clarity — clearly articulate the performance measures, including both expected results or targets and actual results.
- Data Integrity — the source of the data and how the data is interpreted or used to draw conclusions should be clearly and fairly articulated.
- Context — provide background on why these particular performance measures were chosen, such as cost, timeliness, availability, etc.
- Production — reference sources of performance measures and how the measures were collected.
- Dissemination — ensure performance measures are distributed throughout all levels of the organization and are made readily available.
- When communicating performance measures externally, the following items should be addressed to ensure measures are readily available and accessible:
- Delivery — how and where will the performance measures be communicated?
- Audience — identify who the primary audience will be.
- Format — what is the best way to present the information?
- Frequency — how often will the performance measures be communicated/updated?
- Clarity — explain the exact source of the data, how the calculations were conducted and why, what the performance measures show, both expected results and actual results.
- Context — provide background on why these particular performance measures were chosen, why, if any target measures were set and why, and what the results mean to operations, service levels, or community outcomes.
Best Practices on Performance Measurements was published by the Government Finance Officers Association and excerpted with permission.
-
Policy Brief
Support legislation that would restore advance refunding bonds.
Urge your members of Congress to introduce and support the passage of legislation that would restore advance refunding bonds. -
Policy Brief
Restore the Balance of Federalism and Optimize Intergovernmental Partnerships
ACTION NEEDED: -
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023
This analysis includes funding highlights for key programs impacting counties. -
Reports & Toolkits
Resource Hub for Counties: State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Fiscal Recovery, Infrastructure And Disaster Relief Flexibility Act
The bipartisan State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Fiscal Recovery, Infrastructure, and Disaster Relief Flexibility Act will provide additional flexibility for the $350 billion Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund authorized under the American Rescue Plant Act. -
Press Release
State And Local Government Associations Commend Congress For Infrastructure And Disaster Flexibility
With the enactment of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, the seven leading organizations representing state and local governments at the federal level thank Congress for providing flexibility to use American Rescue Plan Act funds for purposes of infrastructure, neighborhood revitalization, and disaster relief. -
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Analysis for Counties: State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Fiscal Recovery, Infrastructure And Disaster Relief Flexibility Act
VIEW YOUR COUNTY’S ARPA FLEXIBLE FUND ALLOCATION UNDER S. 3011
-
Reports & Toolkits
State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Resource Hub
Explore NACo's resource hub for the ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund.Reports & Toolkitsdocument010512:15 pmReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> -
Basic page
ClearGov
ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.pagepagepage<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr> -
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
Related Resources
-
Blog
U.S. Congress moves forward with financial data reporting standards
On December 6, U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee leadership unveiled a bicameral, bipartisan FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act that includes the Financial Data Transparency Act, which was led by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) in the U.S. House and Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) in the U.S. Senate. -
Blog
GASB seeks input on subsequent reporting guidance
In September 2022, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) published a survey for financial statement preparers to evaluate GASB’s existing standards for the financial reporting of subsequent events by state and local governments. The survey will close on November 18, 2022 and counties are encouraged to respond. -
Blog
Let’s Get automating: Why You Should Modernize Your County’s Expense System
“Automating your expense process addresses drawbacks of manual systems, speeds up cycle times, eliminates human error, reduces fraud, and provides clear visibility into expenses.”
-
Policy Brief
Support legislation that would restore advance refunding bonds.
Urge your members of Congress to introduce and support the passage of legislation that would restore advance refunding bonds. -
Policy Brief
Restore the Balance of Federalism and Optimize Intergovernmental Partnerships
ACTION NEEDED: -
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023
This analysis includes funding highlights for key programs impacting counties.
More From
-
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Inflation Reduction Act
The IRA offers counties the opportunity to pursue clean energy initiatives and reduce emissions through new competitive grant programs, local resiliency investments and clean energy tax credits.
Learn More