U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow ruling in case concerning impact fees
Upcoming Events
Related News
![construction_image.png Image of construction_image.png](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/807x448/public/construction_image.png?h=90b0b8ad&itok=wp1enTNJ)
Key Takeaways
On April 12, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a narrow, unanimous ruling in Sheetz v. El Dorado County, a case focused on the constitutionality of legislatively (rather than administratively) enacted impact fees. In Sheetz, a resident of El Dorado County, California challenged the constitutionality of a traffic mitigation fee required in exchange for a development permit. He argued that because the county did not make an individualized determination that the fee in question met constitutional tests requiring an “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality," it violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause.
- County nexus: Exaction or impact fees are an important way for county governments to balance the benefits of growth with its impacts on the pre-existing community. The petitioner's argument would undermine the ability of county governments to legislatively enact impact fees by requiring a case-by-case determination that the fees meet constitutional conditions outlined in Nollan (which requires “essential nexus” between the condition and the government’s land-use interest) and Dolan (which requires the fee to have "rough proportionality" to the development's interest on the land-use interest.)
- NACo advocacy: NACo filed an amicus brief with the Local Government Legal Center in support of El Dorado County, arguing that legislatively enacted, generally applicable impact fees should not be subject to Nollan and Dolan. The brief further emphasized the importance, best practices and ubiquity of legislatively enacted impact fees and stressed that the Court should not require individualized determinations for these fees as doing so would wreak havoc on development. Learn more here.
- The Court’s ruling: In a mixed ruling for counties, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner that the Nollan and Dolan tests do indeed apply to legislatively enacted impact fees and remanded the case back to the state courts for another look. Importantly, however, the Court declined to address any other arguments made by petitioner, including the question of whether local governments must make individualized determinations regarding impact fees.
Critically, the Court's narrow decision does not prevent local governments from enacting reasonable permitting conditions (including impact fees) via legislation. Moving forward, local governments should ensure that any such fee complies with Nollan and Dolan’s requirements and be prepared for potential legal challenges given the heightened scrutiny required under these precedents.
2023-2024 Supreme Court Term
![Fishing boat](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-07/GettyImages-1478187164.jpg?h=80e376df&itok=iidfURh6)
U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Chevron doctrine to reshape the federal administrative state
In major ruling, U.S. Supreme Court overturns longstanding precedent deferring to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous statute.
![Opioid-pills_4.jpg Image of Opioid-pills_4.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Opioid-pills_4_0.jpg?h=d73c3389&itok=_kAR4tLC)
U.S. Supreme Court decision halts Purdue Pharma opioid settlement
Supreme Court ruling upends $6 billion settlement agreement between Purdue Pharma and impacted state, county and tribal governments and residents.
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
U.S. Supreme Court protects key flexibility for county governments responding to homelessness
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case of major significance for counties working to develop comprehensive responses to the homelessness crisis.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
U.S. Supreme Court issues narrow decision in malicious prosecution case
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Chiaverini v. Ohio, a case focused on the relationship between probable cause and malicious prosecution claims against local government.
![police.jpg Image of police.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police.jpg?h=876b03bf&itok=o-AowmqW)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' exposure to retaliatory arrest claims
On June 20, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curiam (unauthored) ruling in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case with implications for retaliatory arrest claims against local law enforcement.
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
U.S. Supreme Court ruling may increase counties' legal liability when transferring employees
New test established by the Supreme Court will allow employees demonstrating "some harm" from an unwanted transfer to file a civil rights lawsuit.
![Courtroom.jpg Image of Courtroom.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/Courtroom.jpg?h=d6742c3a&itok=wVqOD78M)
Supreme Court Update: Chiaverini vs. City of Napoleon
The county perspective on a case involving malicious prosecution
![GettyImages-586718274.jpg Image of GettyImages-586718274.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/GettyImages-586718274.jpg?h=cee8c140&itok=aomsMEMd)
Supreme Court Update: Gonzalez v. Trevino
The county perspective on a case involving retaliatory arrests
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
Supreme Court Update: City of Grants Pass v. Gloria Johnson
The county perspective on a case related to the constitutionality of certain local anti-encampment ordinances
![1456277065_smaller](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-02/GettyImages-1456277065_smaller.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=bQTadPGW)
Supreme Court Update: Sheetz v. El Dorado County
The county perspective on a case involving the constitutionality of legislative enacted, generally applicable impact fees for new development
![police-car_stock_2400.jpg Image of police-car_stock_2400.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/police-car_stock_2400.jpg?h=e7747f86&itok=Skh-eDke)
Supreme Court Update: Muldrow v. St. Louis
The county perspective in a case concerning discrimination claims in lateral employment transfers
![smart-phones-stock.png Image of smart-phones-stock.png](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/smart-phones-stock.png?h=fea9fe71&itok=5bhtgojP)
Supreme Court Update: Lindke v. Freed/O'Connor Ratcliff v. Garnier
The county perspective on a case related to public officials' use of personal social media accounts
Featured Initiative
Supreme Court Advocacy Hub
![GettyImages-1395752818.jpg Image of GettyImages-1395752818.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/667x579/public/GettyImages-1395752818_0.jpg?h=c5780bb0&itok=8oF3VWbi)
Related News
![Fishing boat](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/2024-07/GettyImages-1478187164.jpg?h=80e376df&itok=iidfURh6)
U.S. Supreme Court overturns the Chevron doctrine to reshape the federal administrative state
In major ruling, U.S. Supreme Court overturns longstanding precedent deferring to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous statute.
National Association of Counties launches economic mobility program for rural counties
The National Association of Counties (NACo) today announced the creation of Rural Leaders for Economic Mobility (RLEM), a national program with teams of 10 county elected officials and 10 non-elected county leaders to pursue effective strategies to improve economic mobility conditions that move individuals and families out of poverty.
![LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg Image of LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg](https://www.naco.org/sites/default/files/styles/385x285/public/LACounty-Homelessness_vidthumb.jpg?h=2067eb94&itok=0ROwwCGO)
U.S. Supreme Court protects key flexibility for county governments responding to homelessness
On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson, a case of major significance for counties working to develop comprehensive responses to the homelessness crisis.