Bipartisan legislation introduced in House to increase transparency of mail-in ballots
Author

Maxx Silvan

Paige Mellerio
Upcoming Events
Related News

Key Takeaways
Reps. Katie Porter (D-Calif.), Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) and Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.) re-introduced the bipartisan Vote by Mail Tracking Act (H.R. 5658) to increase transparency of and confidence in mail-in ballots.
Here is What the Bill Would Do
Introduced in September 2023, this bipartisan legislation would require that mail-in ballot envelopes:
- Contain a United States Postal Service (USPS) barcode;
- Meet USPS design requirements and standards for machinable letters;
- Include an Official Election mail logo
THE BILL DOES NOT require states to adopt certain mail-in or absentee ballot policies
How Might This Affect Counties?
Counties support a domestic and international mail system that supports our election system and ensures that all voters can fairly and freely participate in our elections. Such a system would include high quality delivery methods, tracking and notice of changes in the system to impacted local governments.
Most county election offices have measures in place that satisfy the requirements of this legislation. In cases where a county does not, implementation could require additional staff time and resources.
The ability to track mail-in ballots, however, is beneficial to both voters and local election officials. County election officials are responsible for the preparation, mailing and processing of all election mail. The ability to track these mailings would enhance the services counties can provide our voters and increase the overall confidence in vote-by-mail systems in general.
Counties would encourage the USPS to coordinate with state and local election officials when implementing the reforms in this bill.
What's Next?
The Vote by Mail Tracking Act was previously introduced in the 117th Congress and was marked up by the House Oversight Committee in November 2022. The bill advanced the committee on a bipartisan basis.
On February 6, 2024 the House Oversight Committee marked up H.R. 5658 and again, advanced the bill on a bipartisan basis. Given the bill's bipartisan support, it could be considered on the floor of the U.S. House in the future.
Want to Learn More?
Related News

NACo Legal Advocacy: Stanley v. City of Sanford
Stanley v. City of Sanford will impact the ability of county governments to balance budgets by reducing or eliminating post-employment benefits for disability retirees.

NACo Legal Advocacy: McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. V. McKesson Corporation
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. V. McKesson Corporation could make it more difficult for counties to challenge FCC orders, many of which have taken steps to preempt and curtail local authority by limiting counties’ abilities to manage their own right of way and assess fair market value permitting and impact fees on providers seeking to construct, modify or extend telecommunications infrastructure in their communities.

U.S. House passes rescissions package
On June 12, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R. 4) in a narrow 214-212 vote. The legislation would cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding, marking the Trump Administration’s first formal attempt to codify funding cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
County News
County News Hot Topics: Elections
