USDA proposes expanding work requirements for food-stamp recipients in response to farm bill

-
BlogOn December 20, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released a new proposed regulation that would more strictly enforce existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps).USDA proposes expanding work requirements for food-stamp recipients in response to farm bill
-
Blog
USDA proposes expanding work requirements for food-stamp recipients in response to farm bill
On December 20, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released a new proposed regulation that would more strictly enforce existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps). The proposal was announced on the same day that President Trump signed the 2018 farm bill into law. USDA expects that SNAP – which costs about $87 billion annually – would see reduced expenditures of about $15 billion over the next ten years under the proposal, a cut of about 1.7 percent.
The proposal identifies changes impacting one specific group of SNAP recipients referred to as able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs), which includes recipients ages 18 through 49 who are not disabled or caring for children or other dependents. In 2016, ABAWDs accounted for about 3.8 million of the 40 million individuals who received SNAP.
Under current law, ABAWDs cannot receive food stamps for longer than three months during a three-year period, unless they are working or enrolled in an education or training program for at least 80 hours a month. However, states can receive waivers for these work requirements under two conditions: if the state’s unemployment rate exceeds 10 percent, or if the state has a demonstrable lack of “sufficient jobs.” A state or geographic area meets this “lacking sufficient jobs” threshold if the unemployment rate in that area is at or exceeds 20 percent of the national average unemployment rate. Currently, 36 states have received partial waivers for ABAWD work requirements and seven states and territories are operating under statewide waivers.
While the proposed regulation would not alter the 10 percent unemployment rate for waivers, it would redefine “sufficient jobs” to require eligible areas to have had at least 6 percent unemployment for two years. For example, a county with a 5.4 percent unemployment rate is currently eligible for a partial waiver through the state. However, under the proposed regulation, the county would not meet the new 6 percent threshold and therefore would not be eligible for a waiver.
Furthermore, the proposal would prevent states from granting waivers for large geographic areas or combining data from high-unemployment areas with that of low-unemployment areas. Instead, waivers would only be allowed in local areas, such as counties and cities, that meet the criteria outlined above. According to USDA estimates, there are currently 775,000 ABAWD recipients who reside in areas that could lose the waivers if the proposal is enacted.
The proposal would also limit state waivers for ABAWD time limits to one year, reduced from the current two-year limit.
In addition to the waiver changes, the proposal would also limit states’ carry-over exemptions. Under current law, states can exempt up to 15 percent of their ABAWD population from work each year. If these exemptions are not used, they can be “rolled over” for future years, which has permitted states to build up large surpluses of exemptions. Under the proposed rule, the carry-over allowance would be limited to just one year, removing the ability of states and counties to store these exemptions for a future economic downturn.
Counties could be impacted by this proposed rule in multiple ways. First, more stringent time limit and work requirements for ABAWDs may create an additional administrative and financial burden on county agencies who may see an increase in time spent screening and tracking beneficiaries as they move on and off SNAP. Additionally, the new one-year waiver limit may create an additional burden in time spent researching residents’ employment status or the region’s unemployment rate. In response to the new requirements, counties may have to increase administrative capacity in the form of personnel or data, while receiving no new federal resources to offset increased costs. This could especially impact rural counties, who face limited flexibility and resources to comply with new mandates or reporting requirements.
Now that the proposed rule has been published in the Federal Register, the public has 60-days to comment. After USDA considers these comments, the agency will issue a final rule.
NACo will continue to monitor developments around this regulation.
On December 20, the U.S.2019-01-08Blog2019-01-09
On December 20, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released a new proposed regulation that would more strictly enforce existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps). The proposal was announced on the same day that President Trump signed the 2018 farm bill into law. USDA expects that SNAP – which costs about $87 billion annually – would see reduced expenditures of about $15 billion over the next ten years under the proposal, a cut of about 1.7 percent.
The proposal identifies changes impacting one specific group of SNAP recipients referred to as able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs), which includes recipients ages 18 through 49 who are not disabled or caring for children or other dependents. In 2016, ABAWDs accounted for about 3.8 million of the 40 million individuals who received SNAP.
Under current law, ABAWDs cannot receive food stamps for longer than three months during a three-year period, unless they are working or enrolled in an education or training program for at least 80 hours a month. However, states can receive waivers for these work requirements under two conditions: if the state’s unemployment rate exceeds 10 percent, or if the state has a demonstrable lack of “sufficient jobs.” A state or geographic area meets this “lacking sufficient jobs” threshold if the unemployment rate in that area is at or exceeds 20 percent of the national average unemployment rate. Currently, 36 states have received partial waivers for ABAWD work requirements and seven states and territories are operating under statewide waivers.
While the proposed regulation would not alter the 10 percent unemployment rate for waivers, it would redefine “sufficient jobs” to require eligible areas to have had at least 6 percent unemployment for two years. For example, a county with a 5.4 percent unemployment rate is currently eligible for a partial waiver through the state. However, under the proposed regulation, the county would not meet the new 6 percent threshold and therefore would not be eligible for a waiver.
Furthermore, the proposal would prevent states from granting waivers for large geographic areas or combining data from high-unemployment areas with that of low-unemployment areas. Instead, waivers would only be allowed in local areas, such as counties and cities, that meet the criteria outlined above. According to USDA estimates, there are currently 775,000 ABAWD recipients who reside in areas that could lose the waivers if the proposal is enacted.
The proposal would also limit state waivers for ABAWD time limits to one year, reduced from the current two-year limit.
In addition to the waiver changes, the proposal would also limit states’ carry-over exemptions. Under current law, states can exempt up to 15 percent of their ABAWD population from work each year. If these exemptions are not used, they can be “rolled over” for future years, which has permitted states to build up large surpluses of exemptions. Under the proposed rule, the carry-over allowance would be limited to just one year, removing the ability of states and counties to store these exemptions for a future economic downturn.
Counties could be impacted by this proposed rule in multiple ways. First, more stringent time limit and work requirements for ABAWDs may create an additional administrative and financial burden on county agencies who may see an increase in time spent screening and tracking beneficiaries as they move on and off SNAP. Additionally, the new one-year waiver limit may create an additional burden in time spent researching residents’ employment status or the region’s unemployment rate. In response to the new requirements, counties may have to increase administrative capacity in the form of personnel or data, while receiving no new federal resources to offset increased costs. This could especially impact rural counties, who face limited flexibility and resources to comply with new mandates or reporting requirements.
Now that the proposed rule has been published in the Federal Register, the public has 60-days to comment. After USDA considers these comments, the agency will issue a final rule.
NACo will continue to monitor developments around this regulation.

About Eryn Hurley (Full Bio)
Director of Government Affairs & Federal Fellowship Initiative
Eryn serves as the Director for NACo’s Government Affairs Department. In this capacity, she assists in Legislative and Executive Branch outreach and advocacy of the association’s legislative priorities and policy development.More from Eryn Hurley
-
Blog
USDA moves to expand flexibility for schools to offer free school meals
On March 23, the U.S. Department of Agriculture proposed an expansion of the Community Eligibility Provision, an option by which schools with a sufficiently low-income population can offer free school meals to all students. -
Webinar
County Strategies to Provide Supportive Housing for Familiar Faces
Mar. 29, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pmUnable to attend? Watch the recording here. -
Reports & Toolkits
Mental Health Awareness Month: County Participation Toolkit
This May, we invite the nation’s 3,069 counties, parishes and boroughs to participate in Mental Health Awareness month. -
Blog
Addressing social determinants of health with GIS technology
Discover the transformative power of GIS technology in addressing social determinants of health and building healthier communities. -
Blog
HHS proposes new rule to improve availability of kinship foster care homes
On February 14, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families (ACF) announced a new proposed regulation that would allow child welfare agencies to adopt less burdensome licensing standards for all relative and kinship foster family homes. -
Blog
Pandemic-era SNAP benefits expire
On March 1, the temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits known as emergency allotments came to an end. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, these increased monthly benefits were authorized in 2020 by the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA, P.L. 116-127) and provided vulnerable households with additional grocery benefits to help mitigate the negative economic impacts caused by the pandemic.
-
Webinar
County Leaders Championing Justice Efforts in Local Communities
April 5, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pmCounties are directing resources to programs, practices and policies to reduce the overuse and misuse of the criminal legal system, improve public safety, better serve residents with behavioral health conditions and improve community stability and health.04052:00 pm<p>Counties are directing resources to programs, practices and policies to reduce the overuse and misuse of the criminal legal system, improve public safety, better serve residents with behavioral health conditions and improve communit
-
Basic page
Transforming County Human Services Network
Counties Matter in Human Services There are over 257,000 county human services employees across the country delivering vital services to our nation’s most vulnerable populations.pagepagepage<h3><strong>Counties Matter in Human Services</strong></h3>
-
Basic page
Human Services & Education Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to children’s issues, foster care, public assistance and income support, services to senior citizens and individuals with disabilities, immigration policy, social services, and elementary, secondary and post-secondary education. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to children’s issues, foster care, public assistance and income support, services to senior citizens and individuals with disabilities, immigration policy, social services, and elementary,
Contact
-
Director of Government Affairs & Federal Fellowship Initiative(202) 942-4204
Related Posts
-
BlogUSDA moves to expand flexibility for schools to offer free school mealsMar. 30, 2023
-
BlogAddressing social determinants of health with GIS technologyMar. 15, 2023
-
BlogHHS proposes new rule to improve availability of kinship foster care homesMar. 14, 2023
Related Resources
-
Reports & ToolkitsMental Health Awareness Month: County Participation ToolkitMar. 24, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsThe County Role In Long-Term CareFeb. 24, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsLegislative Toolkit for Counties: Priorities for Strengthening the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)Feb. 11, 2023
Related Events
-
5Apr2023Webinar
County Leaders Championing Justice Efforts in Local Communities
Apr. 5, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm
More From
-
ARPA Impact Report: An Analysis of How Counties are Addressing National Issues With Local Investments
With American Rescue Plan funds, counties are strengthening America’s workforce, addressing the nation’s behavioral health crisis, expanding broadband access, improving housing affordability and building prosperous communities for the next generation.
Learn More