Rulemaking planned on Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs; local government call scheduled for April 10

Image of GettyImages-945938110.jpg

Key Takeaways

On March 8, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)  published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing to solicit information relating to the agency’s implementation of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA). EGRRCPA amends the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and requires that the CFPB write regulations to strengthen consumer protections in residential PACE programs. This ANPR is only the first step of the process and will inform the CFPB’s rulemaking as the process moves forward. The agency will accept comments on the ANPR until May 7, 2019, and CFPB will host a call with county officials to review and receive feedback on the proposed rule on April 10 at 2:00pm ET. Further information on the call is provided below.

PACE is a financing mechanism issued by state and local governments to incentivize renewable energy and energy efficiency improvements – such as energy efficient boilers, upgraded insulation, new windows and solar panel installations – to homes and businesses. Structured as a traditional tax assessment, local governments participating in PACE obtain startup funding through bonds or third-party entities. Once financing is secured, counties make PACE loans to residents and businesses for energy efficient improvements. These loans are paid back on an annual or biannual basis through a special property tax assessment on the property. Currently, 36 states have PACE enabling laws and 20 states have active PACE programs. This rulemaking is especially relevant to California, Florida and Missouri who have active residential PACE programs, along with other states that are considering similar programs.

EGRRCPA was signed into law in 2018. While primarily focused on the banking industry, EGRRCPA instructs the CFPB to study whether TILA requirements should be applied to residential PACE programs. Through the ANPR, the CFPB is seeking feedback on 34 questions, including some that are relevant to local government PACE programs. The questions can be found on pages 6-14 of the ANPR and are also available through this link.

To learn more about the local government perspective on PACE, CFPB is hosting a conference call on Wednesday, April 10 at 2:00pm ET with local government officials and staff. To receive call-in information, please RSVP with Zach George at zgeorge@naco.org or 202.661.8819.

CFPB is accepting written comments on the PACE ANPR until May 7, 2019 through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Please identify Docket ID No. CFPB-2019-0011 in your comments.

Image of GettyImages-945938110.jpg

Attachments

Related News

bike
Advocacy

New Law Brings Long-Sought Transparency to FEMA Disaster Reimbursements

A new federal law requires FEMA to publish a publicly accessible, interactive dashboard tracking all Public Assistance reimbursement requests, giving counties unprecedented visibility into disaster recovery funding.

LUCC members pause for a photo near the U.S. Capitol while visiting Washington, D.C. for meetings on housing. Photo by Rich Wills
County News

LUCC members tackle housing affordability shortage

Urban county officials visited Washington, D.C. to explore data-driven approaches to expanding housing supply and affordability and relay their concerns to members of Congress.

NACo President J.D. Clark, First Vice President George Dunlap and Executive Director Matt Chase recently participated in a meeting of the Big Seven — the nation’s principal state and local government organizations. State and local leaders discussed the evolving intergovernmental system and considered ideas for how working together can advance shared priorities and secure better outcomes for communities nationwide.
County News

Reflections on federalism at America 250

NACo CEO Matt Chase: "Counties are where federal and state policy stops being policy and starts being real. We are not a delivery mechanism for decisions made elsewhere. We are where American governance actually lives."