NACo submits comments on proposed changes to SNAP eligibility

Image of GettyImages-1068006592.jpg

Key Takeaways

View Comments

On September 23, NACo submitted comments on a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposed rule that would implement stricter eligibility requirements for individuals and families seeking Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

As drafted, the USDA proposal would narrow broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE) for SNAP, a process that aims to streamline the welfare application process by allowing certain individuals receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program benefits to qualify for SNAP.

Under SNAP’s current broad-based categorical eligibility rules, states are not required to review a person’s total assets and can consider program applicants with incomes above 130 percent of the federal poverty level. Current regulations allow recipients of all non-cash, in-kind and TANF services to be considered for SNAP eligibility. The proposed rule would alter these eligibility rules to apply only to individuals receiving TANF benefits for subsidized employment, work supports or child care benefits.

NACo’s comments outlined concerns about the rule’s potential to create new financial and administrative requirements without providing additional federal resources, thereby creating a new unfunded mandate for local governments. NACo’s comments also noted the proposed rule could result in increased reliance on local agencies and services as residents lose access to their federal benefits.

In general, counties support streamlining of federal programs to reduce mandates and administrative burdens on local governments. This includes supporting processes such as BBCE, which allows counties to easily consider applicants for federal assistance programs we administer.

Given the central role counties play in determining federal program eligibility and delivering services to residents, NACo encourages USDA to consider the full scope of the proposal’s potential impacts and study potential cost shifts to counties before finalizing a new eligibility threshold.

Additional resources on USDA’s proposed rule:

Image of GettyImages-1068006592.jpg

Tagged In:

Related News

Image of Capitol-panorama_2.jpg
Advocacy

U.S. Senate passes amended reconciliation bill text: What it means for counties

On July 1, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed their version of sweeping budget reconciliation legislation.

THE_County Countdown_working_image-4.png
Advocacy

County Countdown – June 30, 2025

Every other week, NACo's County Countdown reviews top federal policy advocacy items with an eye towards counties and the intergovernmental partnership. This week features the Senate reconciliation debate, transparency on sanctuary designations and more.

Image of supreme court.jpg
Advocacy

Supreme Court’s Trump v. Casa, Inc. ruling limits use of nationwide injunctions: what this means for counties

On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Trump v. Casa, Inc. limiting federal district court judges' ability to issue universal injunctions to prevent federal policies from going into effect nationwide.