
-
BlogOn September 14, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s Administrator Seema Verma announced via twitter that the agency was withdrawing the proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Rule (MFAR) from the regulatory agenda.CMS Withdraws Medicaid Financing Regulation
- CMS announced via Twitter that it would be withdrawing MFAR rule after hearing concerns, a win for counties
- NACo has advocated for the withdrawal of rule during COVID-19 relief efforts due to the negative impact it would have on the Medicaid program
- The withdrawal is a win for counties, following months of advocacy to have a moratorium placed on the rule
-
Blog
CMS Withdraws Medicaid Financing Regulation
On September 14, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s Administrator Seema Verma announced via twitter that the agency was withdrawing the proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Rule (MFAR) from the regulatory agenda.
The rule, which was first proposed in November 2019 and was set to be finalized this fall, would have made substantial changes to Medicaid’s financing structure and supplemental payments. The Medicaid program operates as joint federal-state-local partnership, with counties across the nation delivering Medicaid-eligible services and, in many instances, helping states finance and administer the program. If enacted, the rule would have capped two flexible funding mechanisms used by state and local governments to finance their non-federal shares of Medicaid payments: intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) and certified public expenditures (CPEs). An IGT is a transfer of funds from a government entity (such as a county) to the state Medicaid agency that, when used to meet the non-federal share of a Medicaid payment, is eligible to receive federal matching funds. Meanwhile, CPEs are used by government entities (including health care providers) to receive federal matching funds for health care services approved under a state’s Medicaid state plan. In FY 2018, supplemental funding sources such as IGTs and CPEs, as well as other local funding sources, made up 37.5 percent of all Medicaid spending.
The proposed regulation would have also created new reporting requirements for Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments, and placed limitations on supplemental payments to certain health care providers, while also implementing an extensive review process for the addition or renewal of supplemental funding sources under Medicaid.
The withdrawal comes as a win for counties, following months of advocacy to have a moratorium placed on the rule. In February, NACo submitted comments on the proposed rule, which emphasized he potentially burdensome impacts of these proposed provisions on counties. The creation of new reporting requirements, for instance, would require additional time and resources without providing additional federal funding to meet this obligation. Furthermore, the proposed changes to Medicaid’s financing structure could challenge counties’ ability to provide essential health services to vulnerable populations and plan our budgets strategically.
Counties support the current rules, which allow for maximum flexibility for states and counties in meeting the non-federal share of Medicaid payments, and NACo applauds CMS’s consideration of MFAR's impact on the Medicaid program during this critical time.
Resources:
- NACo comments on MFAR proposed rule (NACo comments)
- NACo submits comments on proposal to alter Medicaid financing (NACo Blog)
- Medicaid and Counties: Understanding the Program and Why It Matters to Counties (NACo presentation)
On September 14, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s Administrator Seema Verma announced via twitter that the agency was withdrawing the proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Rule (MFAR) from the regulatory agenda.2020-09-15Blog2020-09-16
On September 14, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid’s Administrator Seema Verma announced via twitter that the agency was withdrawing the proposed Medicaid Fiscal Accountability Rule (MFAR) from the regulatory agenda.
The rule, which was first proposed in November 2019 and was set to be finalized this fall, would have made substantial changes to Medicaid’s financing structure and supplemental payments. The Medicaid program operates as joint federal-state-local partnership, with counties across the nation delivering Medicaid-eligible services and, in many instances, helping states finance and administer the program. If enacted, the rule would have capped two flexible funding mechanisms used by state and local governments to finance their non-federal shares of Medicaid payments: intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) and certified public expenditures (CPEs). An IGT is a transfer of funds from a government entity (such as a county) to the state Medicaid agency that, when used to meet the non-federal share of a Medicaid payment, is eligible to receive federal matching funds. Meanwhile, CPEs are used by government entities (including health care providers) to receive federal matching funds for health care services approved under a state’s Medicaid state plan. In FY 2018, supplemental funding sources such as IGTs and CPEs, as well as other local funding sources, made up 37.5 percent of all Medicaid spending.
The proposed regulation would have also created new reporting requirements for Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments, and placed limitations on supplemental payments to certain health care providers, while also implementing an extensive review process for the addition or renewal of supplemental funding sources under Medicaid.
The withdrawal comes as a win for counties, following months of advocacy to have a moratorium placed on the rule. In February, NACo submitted comments on the proposed rule, which emphasized he potentially burdensome impacts of these proposed provisions on counties. The creation of new reporting requirements, for instance, would require additional time and resources without providing additional federal funding to meet this obligation. Furthermore, the proposed changes to Medicaid’s financing structure could challenge counties’ ability to provide essential health services to vulnerable populations and plan our budgets strategically.
Counties support the current rules, which allow for maximum flexibility for states and counties in meeting the non-federal share of Medicaid payments, and NACo applauds CMS’s consideration of MFAR's impact on the Medicaid program during this critical time.
Resources:
- NACo comments on MFAR proposed rule (NACo comments)
- NACo submits comments on proposal to alter Medicaid financing (NACo Blog)
- Medicaid and Counties: Understanding the Program and Why It Matters to Counties (NACo presentation)

About Blaire Bryant (Full Bio)
Legislative Director – Health | Large Urban County Caucus
More from Blaire Bryant
-
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Inflation Reduction Act
The IRA offers counties the opportunity to pursue clean energy initiatives and reduce emissions through new competitive grant programs, local resiliency investments and clean energy tax credits. -
Press Release
National Association of Counties Announces Commission on Mental Health and Wellbeing
New initiative brings together county leaders to drive action on nation’s mental health crisis -
Reports & Toolkits
Medicaid and Counties: Understanding the Program and Why It Matters to Counties
As Congress considers changes to the nation’s health care system, NACo urges them to consider implications of reforms that would merely shift costs to counties. -
Reports & Toolkits
Behavioral Health Matters to Counties
Through 750 behavioral health authorities and community providers, county governments plan and operate community-based services for persons with mental illnesses and substance use conditions. -
Video
NACo Summit on Mental Health Solutions
Congressional, federal agency leaders and national thought leaders will gather with county officials to discuss priorities for curbing the ongoing mental health crisis. -
Webinar
Local Strategies for Reaching Families and Young Children Experiencing Homelessness
Feb. 8, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pmUnable to attend? Watch the recording here.
Contact
-
Legislative Director – Health | Large Urban County Caucus(202) 942-4246
Related Posts
-
BlogHHS awards CCBHC planning grants to 15 states to help address ongoing mental health crisisMar. 29, 2023
-
County NewsMaryland rural health program aims to prevent teen pregnancies, STIsMar. 27, 2023
-
BlogNACo submits comments to Senate HELP Committee on health care workforce shortagesMar. 23, 2023
Related Resources
-
Reports & ToolkitsMental Health Awareness Month: County Participation ToolkitMar. 24, 2023
-
DocumentThe Principles Quick Guide to Conducting a Needs AssessmentFeb. 27, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsThe County Role In Long-Term CareFeb. 24, 2023
Related Events
-
5Apr2023Webinar
County Leaders Championing Justice Efforts in Local Communities
Apr. 5, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm -
19Apr2023Webinar
Strategies for Leveraging County Health Rankings Data to Improve Community Health
Apr. 19, 2023 , 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm
More From
-
ARPA Impact Report: An Analysis of How Counties are Addressing National Issues With Local Investments
With American Rescue Plan funds, counties are strengthening America’s workforce, addressing the nation’s behavioral health crisis, expanding broadband access, improving housing affordability and building prosperous communities for the next generation.
Learn More