Bipartisan Group in U.S. House Push New Bill to Extend Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) Spending Deadline

Image of Capitol-closeup_2.jpg

Key Takeaways

In late July, Representatives Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) and Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.) introduced H.R. 7854, the Leveraging Options for Counties and Localities (LOCAL) Act. The bill would extend the deadline for Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) recipients to spend their CRF allocations from December 30, 2020 to December 31, 2021. The CRF was established under the CARES Act and provides $150 billion in aid for state, county and municipal governments with populations of over 500,000 people to address necessary expenditures incurred due to the COVID-19 public health emergency.

As established under the CARES Act, if a county – either above or below 500,000 residents – does not spend its entire CRF allocation by December 30, 2020, the remaining dollars will be recouped by the U.S. Treasury. The delay in formulating guidance around this money and the general uncertainty that existed at the beginning of the pandemic and continues today makes it difficult for CRF recipients to meet the December deadline.

Understanding the unpredictable nature of the pandemic and its ongoing demands, the LOCAL Act seeks to provide local governments the flexibility needed to plan for future costs associated with the pandemic in 2021 and beyond. Additionally, the bill the strict deadline does not allow counties to plan for future costs in 2021 and beyond. The bill also encouraged states to distribute a portion of their CRF allocation to counties with populations of less than 500,000 that did not receive direct funds.

Counties are spending CRF funds quickly and wisely. As counties continue to play a significant role in addressing and mitigating the impacts of COVID-19, direct CRF recipients and counties that received sub-allocations from their states have both found creative ways to use these funds to help their communities. From small business support grant programs to homelessness assistance initiatives and broadband expansion, these dollars have been critical for counties to properly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. For more information and examples on how counties have spent their CRF allocations, click here.

Since the onset of the pandemic, NACo has advocated for direct, flexible federal relief funding for counties of all sizes. A recent NACo analysis revealed that a $202 billion impact on county budgets is expected through FY2021 due to the pandemic. Following the implementation of the CRF program, NACo has advocated for an extension in the CRF spending deadline and to allow these funds to be used to cover revenue shortfalls. NACo will continue to support efforts to improve the CRF and expand COVID-19 relief for counties of all sizes.

To learn more about NACo’s work on COVID-19 response and the Coronavirus Relief Fund, click here.

Related News

2198404841
Advocacy

Supreme Court allows new SAVE citizenship voter verification system to proceed

On Sept. 25, the U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal from the White House to pause a lower court’s ruling blocking its use of a new SAVE system ahead of the midterms.

144210903
Advocacy

Supreme Court declines emergency review of USPS mail-in ballot rule, leaving nationwide block in place

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision to allow the Trump administration to move forward with its Executive Order 14399 directing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to compile official U.S. citizenship lists to be used in voter citizenship verification and the U.S. Postal Service to impose new mail-in ballot restrictions.

Image of GettyImages-183803161_CENSUSQnA_desat.jpg
Advocacy

Census Bureau proposes permanent changes to the 2030 Decennial Census

On September 10, the U.S Census Bureau published a proposed rule to the 2030 Decennial Census that would create two new parts of the 15 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that among other changes would a) define “usual residence” that excludes foreign persons previously counted that are not U.S. citizens or lawful residents, and b) would eliminate any questions about race, ethnicity and sexual orientation from the census questionnaire used to enumerate the population. The proposed ruling outlines only 30 days for public comments, which are due on October 13.