Treatment and Housing Services for Persons with Serious Mental Illness
Error message
In order to filter by the "in queue" property, you need to add the Entityqueue: Queue relationship.-
County NewsHomelessness remains a serious and chronic problem in the United States. Although the number of persons who are homeless has decreased slightly as the economy has improved over the past several years, about 600,000 persons will be homeless tonight, including about 40,000 military veterans.Treatment and Housing Services for Persons with Serious Mental Illness
-
County News Article
Treatment and Housing Services for Persons with Serious Mental Illness
Homelessness remains a serious and chronic problem in the United States. Although the number of persons who are homeless has decreased slightly as the economy has improved over the past several years, about 600,000 persons will be homeless tonight, including about 40,000 military veterans. Of this number, between 120,000 and 180,000 (20 percent–30 percent) are persons who have a serious mental illness.
Mental illness is a key risk factor for becoming homeless, and being homeless is a key risk factor for becoming incarcerated. Thus, tonight, about 180,000 persons incarcerated in our county and local jails will be persons with a serious mental illness, many of whom are homeless.
Common knowledge in the behavioral health field asserts that if a person does not have a home, then the jail becomes his or her home. A fundamental question is how to break this cycle of mental illness-homelessness-incarceration.
One key intervention is excellent mental health services. Our current work with county mental health and behavioral health programs has linked weak crisis- response capacity with higher levels of incarceration for persons with serious mental illness.
Good crisis response services include warm and hot lines, crisis intervention team training for police and other first responders, respite beds for clients and for family members, restoration or sobering centers, community residential and hospital inpatient beds, and effective case management and peer support services. Since only large counties are likely to have all of these services, the operational question becomes which of these services a county actually needs to put into place to reduce incarceration of persons with serious mental illness.
A second key intervention is good housing services. We have learned that mental health services and other health services will be less effective if a client has no place to live. Hence, it is important to address both health and housing needs. Good housing services for persons with serious mental illness include both short- and longer-term transitional housing, as well as permanent housing, each with appropriate mental health service supports. These supports will include case management and peer support, as well as appropriate treatment interventions. In the most highly developed systems, they also can include job and social supports as well.
Although Medicaid is a primary source of service funding for persons who are mentally ill and homeless, it was not designed to pay for housing, per se. However, the Center for Medicaid Services, through its Innovation Center, has developed demonstration grants intended to deploy Medicaid funds to pay for the necessary infrastructure that will link health and behavioral health service clients with needed housing, job and social supports. Counties should monitor these Community Accountable Care Grants to determine how well they work and whether they will be continued by CMS in the future.
Some counties already are developing housing for those with serious mental illness. One variant is longer-term, yet temporary housing for persons who are homeless. The Haven for Hope in Bexar County, Texas, is probably the pre-eminent example of this arrangement. Persons and families can reside for up to two years at the Haven while learning needed job skills. Funding for the Haven was provided through a large philanthropic grant.
A second variant is the conversion of former motels and hotels into permanent housing for persons who are mentally ill and homeless. Sometimes these conversions are paid for with donated private funds, other times by appropriated county funds. Good examples of these arrangements can be found in Sonoma County, Calif. and Victoria, Texas.
A third variant is the conversion of a house into a permanent small group home for several clients, usually with donated funds. Examples of this arrangement can be found in King County, Wash. and Fairfax County, Va.
A fourth variant is a full continuum of housing arrangements from short- to longer-term temporary housing and permanent housing. An excellent example of this arrangement can be found in Los Angeles County, which supports eight different levels of housing arrangements for persons with serious mental illness. Funds to support this program are provided through the “millionaires’ tax” for mental health, which is unique to California.
Thus, to be able to provide both health and housing services, counties will need to be very agile. In many instances, public-private partnerships will be necessary secure funding to develop required housing.
The population of persons who are both mentally ill and homeless presents counties with a very complex service problem. Solutions to this problem will require a comparable level of creativity and complexity.
Homelessness remains a serious and chronic problem in the United States.2016-12-19County News Article2023-04-11
Homelessness remains a serious and chronic problem in the United States. Although the number of persons who are homeless has decreased slightly as the economy has improved over the past several years, about 600,000 persons will be homeless tonight, including about 40,000 military veterans. Of this number, between 120,000 and 180,000 (20 percent–30 percent) are persons who have a serious mental illness.
Mental illness is a key risk factor for becoming homeless, and being homeless is a key risk factor for becoming incarcerated. Thus, tonight, about 180,000 persons incarcerated in our county and local jails will be persons with a serious mental illness, many of whom are homeless.
Common knowledge in the behavioral health field asserts that if a person does not have a home, then the jail becomes his or her home. A fundamental question is how to break this cycle of mental illness-homelessness-incarceration.
One key intervention is excellent mental health services. Our current work with county mental health and behavioral health programs has linked weak crisis- response capacity with higher levels of incarceration for persons with serious mental illness.
Good crisis response services include warm and hot lines, crisis intervention team training for police and other first responders, respite beds for clients and for family members, restoration or sobering centers, community residential and hospital inpatient beds, and effective case management and peer support services. Since only large counties are likely to have all of these services, the operational question becomes which of these services a county actually needs to put into place to reduce incarceration of persons with serious mental illness.
A second key intervention is good housing services. We have learned that mental health services and other health services will be less effective if a client has no place to live. Hence, it is important to address both health and housing needs. Good housing services for persons with serious mental illness include both short- and longer-term transitional housing, as well as permanent housing, each with appropriate mental health service supports. These supports will include case management and peer support, as well as appropriate treatment interventions. In the most highly developed systems, they also can include job and social supports as well.
Although Medicaid is a primary source of service funding for persons who are mentally ill and homeless, it was not designed to pay for housing, per se. However, the Center for Medicaid Services, through its Innovation Center, has developed demonstration grants intended to deploy Medicaid funds to pay for the necessary infrastructure that will link health and behavioral health service clients with needed housing, job and social supports. Counties should monitor these Community Accountable Care Grants to determine how well they work and whether they will be continued by CMS in the future.
Some counties already are developing housing for those with serious mental illness. One variant is longer-term, yet temporary housing for persons who are homeless. The Haven for Hope in Bexar County, Texas, is probably the pre-eminent example of this arrangement. Persons and families can reside for up to two years at the Haven while learning needed job skills. Funding for the Haven was provided through a large philanthropic grant.
A second variant is the conversion of former motels and hotels into permanent housing for persons who are mentally ill and homeless. Sometimes these conversions are paid for with donated private funds, other times by appropriated county funds. Good examples of these arrangements can be found in Sonoma County, Calif. and Victoria, Texas.
A third variant is the conversion of a house into a permanent small group home for several clients, usually with donated funds. Examples of this arrangement can be found in King County, Wash. and Fairfax County, Va.
A fourth variant is a full continuum of housing arrangements from short- to longer-term temporary housing and permanent housing. An excellent example of this arrangement can be found in Los Angeles County, which supports eight different levels of housing arrangements for persons with serious mental illness. Funds to support this program are provided through the “millionaires’ tax” for mental health, which is unique to California.
Thus, to be able to provide both health and housing services, counties will need to be very agile. In many instances, public-private partnerships will be necessary secure funding to develop required housing.
The population of persons who are both mentally ill and homeless presents counties with a very complex service problem. Solutions to this problem will require a comparable level of creativity and complexity.
Hero 1
About Ron Manderscheid (Full Bio)
Executive Director, National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors
Ron Manderscheid is the executive director of the National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors and the National Association for Rural Mental Health and an adjunct professor in the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.More from Ron Manderscheid
-
Webinar
New Options to Combat Summer Hunger: What Counties Need to Know
Sep. 21, 2023 , 1:00 pmSummer hunger impacts too many children when they lose access to nutritious school meals. -
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Toolkit for Counties: Priorities for Strengthening the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
This toolkit provides an overview of the county role in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), federal policy priorities for ensuring SNAP is effectively serving county residents and the current legislative and administrative outlook for program reforms. -
County News
‘Dr. Drew’ applauds progress in mental health care, but ‘still progress to be made’
“It’s not that hard to treat,” Pinsky said of the mental health crisis. “We just need the resources, we need the beds, we need the psychiatrists.” -
County News
Two-county solution offers urban Nevada kids a rural retreat
Clark County, Nevada youths now have access to a new 4-H camp in neighboring Lincoln County, which will retain jobs it would have lost when a corporate retreat center closed. -
County News
County’s mobile market closes the grocery desert gap
Gwinnett County, Ga. teamed up with a food bank to create a mobile community market to alleviate food insecurity, which had increased during the pandemic. -
County News
Collaboration helps Dallas County, Texas reduce homelessness
Dallas County, which has the largest population of people experiencing homelessness in Texas, is working with local governments and non-profits to combat the crisis through the R.E.A.L. Time Rehousing program.
-
Basic page
Human Services & Education Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to children’s issues, foster care, public assistance and income support, services to senior citizens and individuals with disabilities, immigration policy, social services, and elementary, secondary and post-secondary education. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to children’s issues, foster care, public assistance and income support, services to senior citizens and individuals with disabilities, immigration policy, social services, and elementary,
Contact
-
Executive Director, National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors
Related Resources
-
County News
‘Dr. Drew’ applauds progress in mental health care, but ‘still progress to be made’
“It’s not that hard to treat,” Pinsky said of the mental health crisis. “We just need the resources, we need the beds, we need the psychiatrists.” -
County News
Two-county solution offers urban Nevada kids a rural retreat
Clark County, Nevada youths now have access to a new 4-H camp in neighboring Lincoln County, which will retain jobs it would have lost when a corporate retreat center closed. -
County News
County’s mobile market closes the grocery desert gap
Gwinnett County, Ga. teamed up with a food bank to create a mobile community market to alleviate food insecurity, which had increased during the pandemic.
-
Reports & Toolkits
Legislative Toolkit for Counties: Priorities for Strengthening the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
This toolkit provides an overview of the county role in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), federal policy priorities for ensuring SNAP is effectively serving county residents and the current legislative and administrative outlook for program reforms. -
Reports & Toolkits
The County Role in Food Systems
Among our numerous responsibilities, serving as the front line of the social safety net is a primary function of county governments to ensure healthy, safe and vibrant communities for our residents. -
Reports & Toolkits
The County Human Services and Education Landscape
Counties invest heavily in residents’ health and well-being, often serving as the ultimate safety net for low-income residents. This toolkit provides an overview of the county role in federal human services and education programs that help vulnerable residents thrive.