Jump to Section |
Overview
On August 10, the Senate passed the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act (IIJA). The bipartisan infrastructure legislation would provide $973 billion over five years from FY 2022 through FY 2026, including $550 billion in new investments for all modes of transportation, water, power and energy, environmental remediation, public lands, broadband and resilience. In addition to providing authorizations for a wide variety of programs, the IIJA would also make supplemental appropriations to several federal agencies:
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- U.S. Department of Energy
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- U.S. Department of the Interior
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Transportation
Counties play a major role in America's transportation and infrastructure network, owning and operating 44 percent of public roads and 38 percent of bridges -- more than any other level of government. Simultaneously, counties directly support 78 percent of public transit systems and 34 percent of airports that keep our residents connected in every corner of the country. Each year, counties invest $134 billion in the construction of infrastructure and the maintenance and operation of public works.
|
IIJA By the Numbers |
| Click here |
Above baseline investments for sectors addressed in IIJA include:
- Transportation: $284 billion
- Water: $55 billion
- Broadband: $65 billion
- Energy & Power: $73 billion
- Environmental remediation: $21 billion
- Western water infrastructure: $8.3 billion
- Resiliency: $46 billion
IIJA would direct $284 billion in above baseline spending toward all modes of transportation and $266 billion for other infrastructure sectors. As is the case in the American Jobs Plan and past proposals from Senate Republicans, IIJA would direct most of its investments – nearly 52 percent – toward modernizing and making improvements to transportation infrastructure, with the majority of funding reserved for highways, roads and bridges:
- Roads & Bridges: $110 billion
- Transit: $39 billion
- Rail: $66 billion
- Safety: $11 billion
- Airports: $25 billion
- Ports & Waterways: $17 billion
- Electric vehicle chargers: $7.5 billion
- Electric buses: $7.5 billion
- Reconnecting Communities: $1 billion
IIJA Transportation Funds
Proposed New Spending Pay-Fors
The framework would be paid for, at least in part, through a variety of sources, including:
- Repurposed COVID relief funds from 2020: $205 billion
- Recouping fraudulently paid federal unemployment benefits: $50 billion
- States returning used enhanced federal unemployment insurance supplements: $53 billion
- Sales of future spectrum auctions: $20 billion
- Proceeds of the February 2021 c-band auction: $67 billion
- Delaying Medicare Part D rebate rule: $49 billion
- Economic growth resulting from a 33 percent return on investment in these long-term infrastructure projects: $56 billion
- Applying information reporting requirements to cryptocurrency: $28 billion
- Extending fees on government-sponsored enterprises: $21 billion
- Reinstating Superfund fees: $13 billion
- Continuing the mandatory sequester: $8.7 billion
- Extending customs user fees: $6 billion
- Strategic Petroleum Reserve sales: $6 billion
- Savings from reducing Medicare spending on discarded medications from large, single-use drug vials: $3 billion
- Extending available interest rate smoothing options for defined benefit pension plans: $2.9 billion
Major Provisions for Counties
- Establishes a new, long-term surface transportation reauthorization
- Raises the off-system bridge set-aside by five percent, resulting in a $330 million increase to $1.035 billion annually
- Extends the Secure Rural Schools program for three years
- Significantly increases the number of competitive grant opportunities via supplemental appropriations to the U.S. Department of Transportation
- Increases the cap on Private Activity Bonds from $15 billion to $30 billion
- Authorizes $14.65 billion for the Environmental Protection Agency's Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund over five years
- Provides $1 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program
- Fully funds the Safeguarding Tomorrow through Ongoing Risk Mitigation (STORM) Act, which would allow state and local governments to utilize low interest loans for pre-disaster mitigation activities
- Creates a new population band within the Surface Transportation Block Grant for communities between 50,000 and 200,000 to allow for a more equitable suballocation of funds
- Establishes a new competitive grant program for local governments to address and eliminate at-grade rail crossings
- Creates a new, $40 billion Bridge Investment Program that off-system bridges would be eligible for to repair, replace and rehabilitate the nation's bridges
- Significantly expands Buy America requirements for covered infrastructure materials
- Codifies elements of the Trump Administration's "One Federal Decision" that would require one federal agency to be responsible for issuing a decision resulting from a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review, among other reforms, such as limiting the allowable number of pages for a decision
- Increases project cost thresholds for categorical exclusions, thereby making more projects eligible for streamlining
- Fails to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, requiring a $118 billion bailout from the general fund of the U.S. Treasury to fund highway and transit programs
- Authorizes $3.5 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program in FY 2022
- Includes $5 billion over five years for a new grant program to support activities that reduce the likelihood and consequence of impacts to the electric grid due to extreme weather, wildfire and natural disaster
- Establishes a new State and Local Cybersecurity grant program
|
Transportation |
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Highways, Transit & Rail Programs | FY 2022 – FY 2026
The IIJA uses S. 1931, the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act, and S. 2016, the Surface Transportation Investment Act, as the foundation for its highway, road, bridge and rail provisions. The primary difference between S. 1931 and S. 2016 and the IIJA are the funding levels, many of which have been increased in the IIJA by its authorization of supplemental appropriations. View NACo's comprehensive analysis of the Senate's highway and rail reauthorization package here.
Highways, Roads & Bridges
Authorizes Highway Trust Fund (HTF) contract authority for highways, roads and bridges for FY 2022 through FY 2026273.15 billion over five years |
Contract authority would be authorized at the following levels over five FY:
Funds would be apportioned to states through nine federal-aid highway formula programs, including two new programs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Makes changes to the Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG)$72 billion over five years |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Significantly increases the cap on state incentive payments to local governments to address at-grade crossings |
The cap established by the Section 130 program would increase from $7,500 to $100,000. The federal cost share would also increase to 100 percent for projects eliminating at-grade rail-highway crossings. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Increases funding for the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) grant program$8 billion over five years |
The bill would appropriate $3.2 billion over five years, in addition to authorizing $4.8 billion in Highway Trust Fund contract authority. Thirty percent of the funds would be reserved for small projects in rural areas, and the federal share for those projects would increase from 60 to 80 percent. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Creates new Bridge Investment Program (BIP)$36.74 billion over five years ($27.5 billion formula | $9.24 billion competitive) |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for the competitive portion of the BIP to carry out small and large bridge projects. Eligible projects would be defined as those meeting the following goals, including:
The federal share for projects would be no more than 50 percent for large projects (defined as those costing more than $100 million) and no more than 80 percent for any other project. Off-system bridges would be eligible. While states would receive the BIP formula funds, the bill would create a 15 percent set-aside within the program to address off-system bridges, much like STBG. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Creates new Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program1 billion over five years |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Establishes a new Wildlife Crossings Pilot Program$350 million over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for this new competitive grant program to carry out eligible projects that reduce collisions and/or improve habitat connectivity. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Codifies the Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) Council |
ROUTES, an initiative of the previous administration, seeks to address disparities in rural transportation. Under IIJA, USDOT would be required to create an internal ROUTES Council tasked with providing technical assistance to rural areas for grant applications, researching and developing strategies to resolve rural transportation issues; and gathering information from stakeholders. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Addresses the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Creates a new competitive grant program to address threats to pedestrians$25 million over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for funds for bollard installation, defined as a "project to install raised concrete or other metal posts on a sidewalk adjacent to a roadway to are designed to slow or stop a vehicle." The federal share would be up to 100 percent. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Establishes a new Rural Surface Transportation Grant Program$2 billion over five years |
A rural area would be defined as "an area outside an urbanized area with a population over 200,000." Eligible counties could apply directly to USDOT for these funds to carry out a wide variety of highway and bridge projects that increase connectivity, improve safety, and facilitate the movement of goods and people at a federal cost share of 80 percent. Counties could also bundle projects.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Establishes new criteria for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to consider when designating county and other local representatives |
MPOs would be required to consider the equitable and proportional representation of the population of the metropolitan area when designating officials or representatives. This section would also enhance coordination among MPOs designated within the same area. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Addresses the Appalachian Regional Commission and the Denali Commission |
|
Permit Streamlining
Codifies "One Federal Decision" permit streamlining provisions |
USDOT would be required to take several steps to implement new streamlining policies, including:
|
Expedites evaluations for projects within an operational right-of-way |
Federal agencies would be required to provide, at minimum, a preliminary review of applications for projects within an operational right-of-way within 45 days of submission. Other deadlines would also be created, and federal agencies not meeting a prescribed timeline would be subject to reporting requirements. |
Increases cost thresholds eligible for categorical exclusions |
For small projects, the threshold would increase from $5 million to $6 million; for large projects, it would increase from $30 million to $35 million, thereby making more projects eligible. |
Climate
Creates new competitive grant programs and state sub-allocation requirements for counties to address climate change.
Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grants$2.5 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for funds to carry out eligible projects that promote the deployment of infrastructure for EVs and hydrogen, propane and natural gas in designated areas. Propane refueling infrastructure would be restricted to medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Fifty percent of total program funds would be distributed annually through Community Grants for the installation of EV and alternative fueling infrastructure on public roads, schools and in other publicly accessible locations. Rural areas, low- and middle-income neighborhoods, and communities with either limited parking or a high number of multiunit housing would be prioritized for awards. The federal cost share would be 80 percent, with an additional requirement that – as a condition of contracting with an eligible entity to carry out a project under this section – a private entity would become responsible for the local match. |
Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities$250 million over five years |
Counties could apply to USDOT to carry out projects that reduce port emissions, including the advancement of port electrification at an 80 percent federal cost share. USDOT would be required to issue a Notice of Funding Opportunity to solicit applications by no later than April 1 each year.
|
Carbon Reduction Formula Program$6.42 billion over five years |
A state would be required to sub-allocate 65 percent of funds apportioned for this purpose on a per-capita basis to counties and other local governments in the same way STBGP funds are distributed. Eligible projects would include public transit projects, trails and other projects to facilitate non-motorized users of the road, the replacement of streetlights with energy-efficient alternatives, purchase or lease of zero-emissions construction equipment, among several others. For areas of 50,000 or more, a state would also be required to provide obligation authority (OA). When obligation authority is provided alongside contract authority, the entity in receipt of OA is able to obligate – or spend – the funds designated for their area, versus OA remaining with the state and the state retaining control over project selection. |
PROTECT Grant Program$8.7 billion over five years ($7.3 billion formula | $1.4 billion competitive) |
In addition to a formula component, the new PROTECT program would also provide competitive grants counties could apply for directly through USDOT to enhance the resiliency of infrastructure assets, including projects to improve coastal infrastructure and evacuation routes. The program would create four subgrants to distribute the funds:
The federal cost share would range from 80 to 100 percent for various projects eligible under this section. There would also be opportunities to reduce the local match requirements by meeting a voluntary resiliency planning requirement. |
Healthy Streets Program$500 million over five years |
Counties with a disproportionate number of communities of color, defined in the legislation as, in a state, a Census block where the total percentage of residents who identify as nonwhite is more than 50 percent, or USDOT determines it to be eligible for funding under this program. Eligible projects would include the installation of cool and/or porous pavements and the expansion of tree cover with the goal of reducing urban heat centers and improving air quality. The federal cost share for this program would be 80 percent, with a waiver of up to 100 percent available at the discretion of USDOT. Counties urge Congress to address global warming and climate change, including through carbon-neutral energy sources and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
Rail
Establishes a new competitive grant program for infrastructure$10 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for a new competitive program to provide single or multi-year grants to carry out projects that would generate national or regional economic mobility or safety benefits. Other federal assistance could be used to meet local match requirements, not to exceed a maximum of 80 percent federal share. Eligible projects would include:
Certain projects could also be bundled. Eligible project costs would include:
USDOT would be required to ensure geographical diversity and a balance between rural and urban areas in project selections, with 50 percent of the funding reserved for projects between $100 million and $500 million. Should a project not be selected, the applicant could request technical assistance. |
Authorizes the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant program (formerly BUILD/TIGER) for the first time$7.5 billion over five years |
For the first time, the RAISE program would become an authorized program, moving it from the discretionary to the mandatory side of the federal ledger and ensuring its continued funding. This flexible, competitive grant program – formerly named both BUILD and TIGER by the two previous administrations, respectively – is widely utilized by counties to carry out a variety of eligible infrastructure projects. Similar to current law, surface transportation projects with significant local or regional impacts would be eligible, including projects to replace and rehabilitate culverts or prevent stormwater runoff. Grant award amounts would be limited to $25 million, and the 50/50 split for urban-rural project selection would remain. |
Establishes a new culvert removal, replacement and restoration grant program$1 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for a new competitive grant program to carry out eligible projects that replace, remove or repair culverts that would improve or restore fish passage for certain fish, with a priority given those species who are endangered or at risk of becoming endangered, or projects that address fresh-water runoff that impact certain marine life. USDOT would be required to provide technical assistance to underserved communities. The section would authorize $800 million annually, with a federal share of no more than 80 percent. |
Authorizes additional funding for the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) grant program$3 billion over five years |
Similar to the RAISE program, counties can apply directly to USDOT for INFRA grants, which are awarded on a competitive basis, have a variety of eligible uses under current law. Funding would be authorized at the following levels:
|
Allows local public authorities to enter into multi-state freight compacts$25 million over five years |
Counties and other local public authorities, including ports, could enter into multi-state compacts to improve the movement of goods, including assembling rights-of-way and performing capital improvements. A compact could subsequently establish a multi-state advisory freight corridor advisory committee with state departments of transportation and other entities, including local governments. USDOT would be required to establish a grant program to facilitate the efforts of these compacts within the first three years of their inception, authorized at $5 million annually over the life of the bill with a 50 percent non-federal match requirement. |
Requires USDOT to establish an intergovernmental research group for freight |
USDOT would be required to create a National Cooperative Freight Transportation Research Program to be administered in conjunction with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). NAS would be required to establish an advisory committee with public and private stakeholders, including local governments and local public authorities, which would be tasked with recommending national research agenda for the program and developing a multi-year strategic plan. NACo will track the creation of this group and push for county inclusion. |
Establishes a new rural assistance program through the Build America Bureau |
Counties located outside of an urbanized area with a population of more than 150,000 would be eligible to apply directly to USDOT for a new Rural and Tribal Assistance Pilot Program. The program would provide financial, technical and legal assistance; assistance with development-phase activities; and information on innovative financing practices to rural and Tribal communities. It would sunset after five years. Funding, which would come from "any amount made available to the Secretary to provide credit assistance under an eligible program that is not otherwise obligated," would be authorized at no more than the following levels each year:
|
Requires consultation with local governments to develop new routes |
Amtrak would be required to consult with states, local governments including counties, relevant commuter and regional transportation authorities, host railroads, the FRA and other stakeholders on the development of new state-supported routes. |
Creates new reporting requirements for some public transit agencies |
A public transit entity that owns infrastructure used for intercity rail passengers in the Northeast Corridor (NEC) would be required to develop an asset management system to inform Amtrak's NEC capital investment program. |
Expands eligibilities under the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant program$5 billion over five years |
CRISI program eligibilities would be expanded to include eligibilities for the following:
|
Extends Restoration and Enhancement grant (REG) program project timelines$250 million over five years |
The amount of time the Restoration and Enhancement grant program can provide funds to support a route would be extended from three to six years.
|
Establishes a new Railroad Crossing Elimination Program$3 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for competitive awards to carry out highway-rail or pathway rail grade crossing improvement projects that focus on improving the safety and mobility of people and goods. Eligible projects would include:
At least 20 percent of the funds would be reserved for rural or tribal areas. The federal cost share could not exceed 80 percent. |
Reforms and renames the Federal-State Partnership for State of Good Repair grant program$42.5 billion over five years ($7.5 billion authorization | $36 billion appropriation) |
The Federal-State Partnership for State of Good Repair grant program would be renamed the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail grant program, and project eligibilities would be expanded to allow for new capacity, including by:
|
Establishes a new Corridor Identification and Implementation program |
A new Corridor Identification and Development Program would be created to facilitate the development of intercity passenger rail corridors. Counties would be eligible to submit corridor proposals. |
Requires an evaluation of the Railway-Highway Crossings program |
USDOT would be required to evaluate the requirements of the railway-highway crossings program and whether the structure of the program provides sufficient incentives and resources to states and local agencies to make changes at highway-rail grade crossings that are most effective at reducing deaths, among other goals. |
Establishes a blocked crossing portal pilot program |
The FRA would be required to establish a blocked crossing portal to collect information about blocked highway-rail grade crossings from the public in order to identify frequent and long-duration blocked highway-rail grade crossings; conduct outreach to communities, emergency responders and railroads; support collaboration in the prevention of incidents at highway-rail grade crossings, and assess the impacts of blocked crossings. The program would last for three years.
|
Establishes a new Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program$5 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for competitive awards to support and implement local safety initiatives to prevent death and serious injury on roads and streets, known as Vision Zero and Toward Zero Deaths national strategies. $200 million would be authorized annually to carry out the program. |
Requires evaluation and improvement of local infrastructure data analysis tools |
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) would be directed to perform outreach to state and local planning and infrastructure decision-making officials to determine the data analysis tools needed to assist local communities in making infrastructure decisions. Based on the outreach, BTS would be required to create a plan for reviewing and updating existing data analysis tools and developing any new tools necessary to assist local communities in making infrastructure investments. |
Establishes a new Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) grant program$500 million over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for competitive awards to carry out demonstration projects focused on smart city or community technologies and systems, including those focused on:
Both development and construction phase activities would be eligible costs. Certain restrictions would apply, including:
|
Establishes a new intergovernmental working group for electric vehicles (EVs) |
USDOT, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy, would be required to establish an EV working group tasked with making recommendations regarding the "development, adoption, and integration of light-, medium-, and heavy-duty EVs into the transportation and energy systems of the U.S." An organization representing local governments, such as NACo, would be among other required members of the group. |
Establishes a risk and system resilience assessment intergovernmental process |
USDOT would be required to work with federal, state and local agencies to develop a process for quantifying annual risk in order to increase system resilience within the nation's surface transportation system. USDOT would be instructed to provide guidance and technical assistance to state and local agencies on the process. |
Authorizes the use of local hiring preference in federally funded infrastructure projects |
Federal transportation grant recipients, including counties, would be authorized to implement a local hiring preference, including through pre-hire agreements. |
Funding & Financing
Authorizes general fund transfer to bail out the Highway Trust Fund |
The trust fund, which is facing imminent insolvency, would receive a transfer from the U.S. Treasury's general fund in the amount of $118 billion, including $90 billion for the highway account and $28 billion for the mass transit account.
|
Raises the cap on Private Activity Bonds |
The cap would increase from $15 billion to $30 billion, which will allow counties to enter into additional public-private partnerships to supplement future surface transportation projects with private investments, which ultimately supports broader community and economic development. |
Makes amendments to the TIFIA program |
Several changes include:
|
Makes local governments eligible for the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program |
Counties could apply directly to USDOT for funds to carry out eligible activities, including testing the design and equity of implementing an alternative user fee among income groups and rural and urban drivers and other activities associated with transitioning away from the federal gas tax. The federal cost share would be 80 percent for entities who have not received a previous grant under the program and 70 percent for those who have. |
Public Transit
Authorizes Highway Trust Fund (HTF) contract authority for mass transit for FY 2022 through FY 2026$69.9 billion over five years |
Contract authority would be authorized at the following levels over five FY:
|
Makes changes to the Capital Investment Grant (CIG) program |
The bill would make several changes to the program, including:
|
Increases rural set-aside for bus grants |
The bill would raise the Buses and Bus Facilities competitive grant set aside for rural projects from 10 to 15 percent. The bill would also require that 25 percent of the competitive funding go to projects related to the acquisition of low or no emission buses or bus facilities rather than zero-emission vehicles and facilities. Further, it would require that recipients of grants related to zero-emissions vehicles or related infrastructure use at least 5 percent of their award to fund workforce development training to address the impact of the transition to zero-emission vehicles. |
Creates new requirements for federal transit fund recipients |
Urbanized Area Formula Grants (5307)The bill would require that section 5307 recipients serving an urbanized area with a population of 200,000 or more include in their comprehensive agency safety plan a risk reduction program for transit operations to improve safety by reducing the number and rates of accidents, injuries, and assaults on transit workers. It would also require that a joint labor-management safety committee be formed to approve the safety plan. Public Transportation Emergency ReliefThe bill would require Emergency Relief Program applicants, including counties, to demonstrate proof of all necessary and required insurance coverage prior to receiving a grant. Transit safetyThe bill would require recipients of federal funding provided by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to report additional data for inclusion in the National Transit Database, including data on assaults of transit workers and bus-related fatalities. |
Airports
Funds the Airport Improvement Program$15 billion over five years |
$3 billion would be provided annually over FY 2022 through FY 2026 from the general fund of the U.S. Treasury and would remain available for the following three years after the year in which it was provided. Funding would be distributed annually in the following ways:
The bill would also clarify that no AIP funds could go toward debt service. |
Creates new "groundside" competitive grant program for airport improvements$5 billion over five years |
The new program would provide $1 billion annually for competitive awards to carry out eligible projects to improve the aging infrastructure of airport terminals, which would be confined to:
No more than 55 percent for large hubs, 15 percent for medium hubs; 20 percent for small hubs; and 10 percent for nonprimary airports could be awarded annually. The federal cost share of a project would be 80 percent for large and medium-size airports and 95 percent for small and nonprimary airports. Projects that would increase access and capacity would be prioritized. |
Ports
Increases funding for the Port Infrastructure Development Program$2.25 billion over five years |
$450 million would be provided annually over FY 2022 through FY 2026 from the general fund of the U.S. Treasury and would remain available for the following ten years after the year in which it was provided. Newly eligible projects would include:
|
|
Energy & Environment |
Creates a new competitive grant program to enhance the resilience of the electric grid$5 billion over five years |
Counties that serve as the local electric grid operator, electric storage operator, electric generator, transmission ower or operator, distribution provider or fuel supplier would be eligible to apply for the propgram. USDOE would make competitive awards to carry out a variety of eligible activities to reduce the likelihood and consequence of impacts to the electric grid due to extreme weather, wildfire and natural disaster. |
Authorizes funding for the Weatherization Assistance Program$3.5 billion in FY 2022 |
Funds would remain available until expended for eligible projects that reduce energy costs for low-income households by improving energy efficiency. Counties would be eligible to apply directly to the program. |
Creates a new Carbon Utilization Grant Program$310.14 million over five years |
State and local governments would be eligible for new grants to procure and use products derived from captured carbon oxides. It would expand the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) Carbon Utilization Program objectives to include developing standards and certifications to support the commercialization of carbon oxide products. Funding would be authorized at the following levels:
|
Creates a new competitive grant program for modernizing energy infrastructure$3 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOE for the new Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Grant Program to carry out demonstration projects focusing on advancing smart community technologies. Selection criteria would include the extent to which an entity has:
Eligible projects would include:
Certain projects would be prioritized. At the request of an applicant, USDOE would provide technical assistance. Finally, a successful applicant would be required to submit to USDOE two years after the date of award a report containing a benefit-cost analysis assessing the cost of deploying the project to the compared benefits, as well as the data supporting how an entity is meeting the project goals. |
Establishes a Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation (CIFIA) Program$2.1 billion over five years |
$600 million would be authorized annually in FY 2022 and FY 2023 and $300 million in each FY 2024 through FY 2026 to establish a CIFIA loan program that would provide flexible, low-interest loans for carbon dioxide transportation infrastructure projects and grants for new infrastructure to facilitate future growth. Counties utilize transportation alternatives, like low-pollutant emission vehicles, mass transit and carpools to help decrease carbon dioxide emission. CIFIA would expand our ability to implement these local programs. |
Addresses needs of transmissions lines |
New revolving loan fund | $2.5 billion over five yearsUSDOE could issue loans to or enter into public-private partnerships with counties and other eligible entities to carry out replacement or enhancement projects on eligible transmission lines. New Transmission Facilitation Program | $50 million over five yearsCounties could apply directly to USDOE for these competitive funds to carry out eligible projects, including:
|
Makes grants to state and local governments for battery processing$3 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to USDOE for these competitive grant funds that would remain available until expended to carry out eligible projects, including:
|
Enhances energy efficiency in public schools$500 million over five years |
Local education agencies and public schools would be eligible to apply to USDOE for competitive grants to carry out eligible activities, including:
A successful application would be required to, upon request of USDOE, submit a report describing how the funds were used, estimated cost-saving, metrics and other requirements outlined in the IIJA. |
Expands Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program eligibilities$550 million in FY 2022 |
Funds would remain available until expended. New eligibilities would include:
|
Provides resources for county-owned or -operated hydroelectric facilities$628.6 million in FY 2022 |
Hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives: IIJA would also authorize $75 million in FY 2022 for hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives. Counties that own or operate a turbine or other generating device which generates hydroelectric energy for sale that will be added to an existing dam or conduit would be eligible for these funds. Hydroelectric capital improvement incentives: IIJA would also authorize $553.6 million in FY 2022 for incentive payments to the owners and operators of hydroelectric facilities for capital improvements related to maintaining and enhancing hydroelectricity generation by improvising grid resiliency, improving dam safety, and environmental improvements. Counties that are the owners or operators of hydroelectric facilities at existing dams would be eligible for these payments to make the capital improvements. |
Funds Brownfields restoration projects$1.2 billion over five years |
The funds could be used to carry out Brownfields projects authorized under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This CERCLA funding would be available in grants, interagency agreements and associated program support costs. Counties are eligible to apply for multipurpose grants, assessment grants, revolving loan fund grants, cleanup and job training grants, technical assistant, training and research grants under CERCLA.
|
|
Public Lands & Western Water Storage |
Extends the Secure Rural Schools (SRS) program for three years |
The annual 5 percent funding reduction would end, and funding would be increased for the next three years to FY 2017 levels, resulting in an increase of approximately $60 million per year compared to FY 2020 payments. Counties could decide whether to accept SRS payments or federal timber harvest receipts for FY 2022 and FY 2023. The bill would create a new Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) appointment pilot program that will allow the U.S. Forest Service Chief or the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Director to present the Secretaries of Agriculture or Interior with recommended RAC members. The Secretaries would have 30 days to confirm or reject the appointees, who would be automatically appointed if no action was taken within that 30-day period. This is similar to an existing pilot program that allows regional foresters and BLM state directors only in Arizona and Montana to appoint RAC members, which has cut down on waiting periods from two years to a few weeks in most instances. Title III funds could be used for expanding broadband access in schools, which will be key to improving educational quality in rural areas. |
|
Provides resources for wildfire risk mitigation$5.5 billion over five years |
$3.4 billion would be directed to the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of the Interior to reduce the threat of wildfire on federal lands through mechanical thinning, timber harvests, prescribed burns, community wildfire protection grants and collaborative led projects. Agencies would have to come up with a plan to treat 10 million acres of forestland by 2027 for wildfire risk reduction within the Wildland-Urban Interface and near critical drinking water sources. The bill would create a new categorical exclusion for forest management activities to establish fuel breaks to protect critical infrastructure from wildfire, including roads, water infrastructure, pipelines and transmission lines. An additional $2.1 billion would be provided for ecosystem restoration through Good Neighbor Agreements, invasive species eradication, cross-boundary management projects and stewardship contracts. Finally, the U.S. Department of Agriculture would have the authority to determine when an emergency situation exists on the national forests, which would allow for expanded forest management activities, such as harvesting dead or dying trees and post-fire reforestation, to be conducted on the National Forest System to meet the emergency threat. |
|
Addresses U.S. Forest Service Legacy Roads and Trails$250 million over five years |
A new Forest Service Legacy Roads and Trails program would be established to prioritize maintenance of authorized roads and trails within the National Forest System. Additionally, the Forest Service would be allowed to decommission existing and previously closed roads and trails after proposed closures have undergone public comment, and the agency ensures closures do not impede resource, recreational or emergency access. The Forest Service would also be able to close some unauthorized user-created roads and trails not identified on agency maps, which may create conflict with users, local governments and other interested parties. |
|
Invests in western water infrastructure, expands eligible uses of American Rescue Plan county relief funds |
Counties and other entities that could demonstrate a need for a project that is technically and financially feasible, is in compliance with applicable laws and guidelines, and provides a federal benefit would be eligible to apply for $100 million in competitive grant funds for small water storage and groundwater storage projects. The bill would allow counties to use aid from the American Rescue Plan Act to satisfy the non-federal match requirement for Bureau of Reclamation projects. |
|
Drinking Water & Wastewater |
The bill uses S. 914, the Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Act of 2021, as a framework for the water infrastructure provisions. The primary differences between S. 914 and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act revolve around lead service lines, emerging contaminants and PFAS.
View NACo's DWWIA analysis here.
Amends state revolving loan funds for water$29.3 billion over five years |
Counties are eligible for grants under both state revolving funds (SRFs). Investments levels for both the drinking water and clean water SRFs would be authorized at the following levels:
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund: The minimum percentage of funds that must go to disadvantaged communities would increase from 6 percent to 12 percent. Buy America requirements would apply to any upgrades made with these funds. Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF): To the extent there are sufficient applications, a state would be required to use a minimum of 10 percent of CWSRF for grants, negative interest loans, and loan forgiveness, or to buy, refinance or restructure debt for disadvantaged communities as determined by the state. The amount for additional subsidies could not exceed 30 percent. |
Addresses water contaminants |
Capitalization grants | $15 billion over five years Forty-nine percent of funds provided to states for capitalization grants would be made available through grants to counties and other local governments to address lead in drinking water by replacing service lines and carrying out associated activities that are directly connected to identifying, planning, designing, and replacing lead service lines. Emerging contaminants | $1 billion over five years Funding to address emerging contaminants would be deposited into the state revolving fund and would be provided to eligible recipients as loans with 100 percent forgiveness or as grants. PFAS | $4 billion over five years Additional funding would be provided to further address emerging contaminants in drinking water, with a focus on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This funding would be provided to eligible recipients as loans with 100 percent forgiveness or as loans. |
|
Broadband |
Makes grants to states for broadband deployment$42.45 in FY 2022 |
The bill would allocate $42.45 billion to the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment Program, which would make grants to states. If a state failed to apply for funding, a local government could apply on their behalf.
|
Creates new "middle mile" competitive grants to facilitate broadband deployment$1 billion over five years |
Counties could apply directly to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) for grants to construct, improve or acquire middle-mile infrastructure. Applications that connect middle mile and last mile networks or plan to provide service in unserved areas, among other criteria, would be prioritized.
|
Extends the Emergency Broadband Benefit program |
The program would be renamed the "Affordable Connectivity Program," and the monthly benefit would be reduced from $50 to $30 for consumers. |
Creates a new competitive grant program for broadband$1.25 billion over five years |
A county would be an eligible recipient of a subgrant, in addition to being eligible to serve as an "administering entity" for a state seeking funding under the newly established State Digital Equity Capacity Grant Program. In an administrator role, a county would do the following:
|
Cybersecurity
Creates a new competitive grant program for cybersecurity$250 million over five years |
A rural electric cooperative or county-owned utility could apply directly to the USDOE for competitive grants and technical assistance, as well as to enter into cooperative agreements with other eligible entities to meet the program's goal of protecting and responding to cyber threats against electric utility systems. |
Establishes a new State and Local Cybersecurity grant program$1.3 billion over four years |
Counties would be eligible for these funds as subgrantees of states following apportionments made to states by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security based on total population and rural population figures. No later than 45 days after a state received its apportionment, it would be required to obligate no less than 80 percent of grant funds to local governments. If a state failed to obligate the funds, a local government could petition DHS for direct funding. Twenty-five percent of the obligated funds would be reserved for rural areas. DHS would be required to consult with local representatives in carrying out this program, which would sunset in FY 2025. |
Requires USDOT to create a cybersecurity tool for state and local public transportation authorities |
USDOT would be required to develop a tool and an office within the Department to assist public transportation agencies, an owner or operator of a highway, and manufacturers producing transportation-related products to protect against cyber incidents within two years of the bill's enactment. |
|
Resilience |
Amends the Stafford Act |
The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act would be amended to expand eligibilities within the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) to include the replacement or installation of wildfire resilient electrical transmissions or utility poles. HMGP provides vital funding to counties following major disaster declarations to make resilience improvements. |
Establishes intergovernmental Commission on wildfire mitigation and prevention |
The Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission would be made up of representatives from the Bureau of Land Management, FEMA, National Park Service, Fish and Wildfire Service and the Forest Service – to study and make recommendations to improve federal policies relating to the prevention, mitigation, suppression and management of wildland fires across the United States. The bill also specifically identifies counties as one of 18 non-federal stakeholders that would hold a place on the Commission. |
Fully funds the Safeguarding Tomorrow through Ongoing Risk Mitigation (STORM) Act$500 million over five years |
The STORM Act would provide state and local governments with the ability to create resilience revolving loan funds for infrastructure projects.
|
Funds the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Program$1 billion over five years |
BRIC, which replaced the FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program, provides funding to states and local governments to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure, such as transportation, energy, water supply and communications. View the FY 2021 BRIC Notice of Funding Opportunity here. |
Funds Flood Mitigation Assistance Grants$3.5 billion over five years |
The competitive grant program provides funding to state and local governments for projects that reduce or eliminate the risk of repetitive flood damage to buildings insured by the National Flood Insurance Program. |
|
Standard







