U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs releases proposed rule to streamline lands into trust process for tribes

-
BlogOn December 5, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs published its new proposed rule on the federal lands into trust process (25 CFR 151) for tribal governments and individual tribal members.U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs releases proposed rule to streamline lands into trust process for tribes
- The U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs seeks comments on proposed changes to its lands into trust process for tribes
- NACo recognizes and respects the tribal right of self-governance to provide for tribal members and to preserve traditional tribal culture and heritage
- NACo supports improvements to the lands into trust process that include meaningful consultation with counties
-
Blog
U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs releases proposed rule to streamline lands into trust process for tribes
On December 5, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) published its new proposed rule on the federal lands into trust process (25 CFR 151) for tribal governments and individual tribal members. The lands into trust process is a set of procedures in which BIA and the U.S. Department of the Interior acquire the title to land and holds it for the use and benefit of tribes or tribal members. This process was established by the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA), which gave the Secretary of Interior general authority to take lands into trust, and later interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S., 129 S. Ct. 1058 (2009). The U.S. Congress has not enacted legislation prescribing the process in which the Secretary places land into trust therefore this process has been guided by federal regulations and court rulings.
In general, the proposed rule provides several major changes to the existing process. First, the rule directly states that the Secretary of the Interior’s policy is favorable towards taking land into trust to support the welfare of tribes. Previous iterations of the rule had not expressed the Department of the Interior’s stance on this process. Second, the rule speeds up the process by requiring BIA to issue a decision on a land into trust request within 120 days of the submission of a complete application package. Counties are concerned that this quick timeline does not give adequate time to truly understand the tax roll and jurisdictional impact on affected counties.
The proposed rule also intends to make the process more efficient by eliminating certain previous criteria and establishes several presumptions to streamline four different forms of acquisitions: (1) on-reservation, (2) contiguous to reservations, (3) off-reservations and (4) initial Indian acquisitions. The “initial Indian acquisitions” category is newly created by the proposed rule to make this process easier for tribes without any land in trust. Lastly, the rule sets forth a regulatory process to determine whether a tribe was “under federal jurisdiction” in 1934, as required by Carcieri v. Salazar.
BIA is currently seeking input on these changes from interested stakeholders. Written comments are required to be submitted by March 1, 2023, and additional information on this process can be found here.
Counties recognize and respect the tribal right of self-governance to provide for tribal members and to preserve traditional tribal culture and heritage. In a similar fashion, NACo recognizes and promotes self-governance by counties to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of all members of their communities. To that end, NACo supports active participation by counties on issues and activities that have an impact on counties and the improvement of the lands into trust process, including revision of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, to require:
- Adequate advance notice of applications,
- Actual meaningful consultation (including providing counties 120 days to respond to applications and requiring the Department of the Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs to respond within 90 days, in writing, to such comments explaining the rationale for acceptance or rejection of those comments), and
- To the extent constitutionally permissible, the consent of the affected counties.
NACo also opposes administrative action or a legislative “quick fix” to overturn the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Carcieri v. Salazar. NACo calls on Congress to address any Carcieri issues as part of a comprehensive examination and congressionally enacted reform of the fee land into trust process.
NACo will continue to monitor updates from BIA on this process and will keep members apprised of any new developments.
On December 5, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs published its new proposed rule on the federal lands into trust process (25 CFR 151) for tribal governments and individual tribal members.2022-12-19Blog2022-12-19
On December 5, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) published its new proposed rule on the federal lands into trust process (25 CFR 151) for tribal governments and individual tribal members. The lands into trust process is a set of procedures in which BIA and the U.S. Department of the Interior acquire the title to land and holds it for the use and benefit of tribes or tribal members. This process was established by the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA), which gave the Secretary of Interior general authority to take lands into trust, and later interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S., 129 S. Ct. 1058 (2009). The U.S. Congress has not enacted legislation prescribing the process in which the Secretary places land into trust therefore this process has been guided by federal regulations and court rulings.
In general, the proposed rule provides several major changes to the existing process. First, the rule directly states that the Secretary of the Interior’s policy is favorable towards taking land into trust to support the welfare of tribes. Previous iterations of the rule had not expressed the Department of the Interior’s stance on this process. Second, the rule speeds up the process by requiring BIA to issue a decision on a land into trust request within 120 days of the submission of a complete application package. Counties are concerned that this quick timeline does not give adequate time to truly understand the tax roll and jurisdictional impact on affected counties.
The proposed rule also intends to make the process more efficient by eliminating certain previous criteria and establishes several presumptions to streamline four different forms of acquisitions: (1) on-reservation, (2) contiguous to reservations, (3) off-reservations and (4) initial Indian acquisitions. The “initial Indian acquisitions” category is newly created by the proposed rule to make this process easier for tribes without any land in trust. Lastly, the rule sets forth a regulatory process to determine whether a tribe was “under federal jurisdiction” in 1934, as required by Carcieri v. Salazar.
BIA is currently seeking input on these changes from interested stakeholders. Written comments are required to be submitted by March 1, 2023, and additional information on this process can be found here.
Counties recognize and respect the tribal right of self-governance to provide for tribal members and to preserve traditional tribal culture and heritage. In a similar fashion, NACo recognizes and promotes self-governance by counties to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of all members of their communities. To that end, NACo supports active participation by counties on issues and activities that have an impact on counties and the improvement of the lands into trust process, including revision of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, to require:
- Adequate advance notice of applications,
- Actual meaningful consultation (including providing counties 120 days to respond to applications and requiring the Department of the Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs to respond within 90 days, in writing, to such comments explaining the rationale for acceptance or rejection of those comments), and
- To the extent constitutionally permissible, the consent of the affected counties.
NACo also opposes administrative action or a legislative “quick fix” to overturn the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Carcieri v. Salazar. NACo calls on Congress to address any Carcieri issues as part of a comprehensive examination and congressionally enacted reform of the fee land into trust process.
NACo will continue to monitor updates from BIA on this process and will keep members apprised of any new developments.

About Maxx Silvan (Full Bio)
Legislative Assistant
Maxx is responsible for analyzing legislation and regulatory activities, as well as administrative duties associated with NACo’s Finance, Pensions and Intergovernmental Affairs and Telecommunications & Technology steering committees. Maxx also helps staff NACo’s Federal Fellowship Initiative.More from Maxx Silvan
-
County News
NACo's new report shows how counties are investing ARPA dollars
In the two years since ARPA's historic passage, counties continue to make transformational investments, spur recovery efforts and bolster the economy through our Recovery Fund allocations. -
-
Reports & Toolkits
Strengthening Local Economies through the Recovery Fund: Executive Summary
NACo's report examines how counties are leveraging American Rescue Plan resources to support communities and rebuild the economy, even as the pandemic continues to affect jobs, public health, housing, and more. -
Reports & Toolkits
American Rescue Plan Resource Hub
In March of 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorized the $350 billion State and Local Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), which provided $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid to every county in America. -
Blog
President Biden releases FY 2024 budget request that includes county priorities
On March 9, 2023, President Biden released his fiscal year (FY) 2024 budget request outlining the administration’s proposal for federal spending for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2024. -
Video
Counties testify on our role in evolving federal land management challenges
Carbon County, Wyo. Commissioner John Espy testifies how counties are best suited to assist federal land managers navigate evolving management challenges.
-
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
Contact
-
Legislative Assistant(202) 942-4224
-
Associate Legislative Director – Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs(202) 942-4272
Related Posts
-
County NewsNACo's new report shows how counties are investing ARPA dollarsMar. 27, 2023
-
BlogPresident Biden releases FY 2024 budget request that includes county prioritiesMar. 9, 2023
-
BlogU.S. Senate Majority Leader urges U.S. Treasury to specify capacity building for competitive federal funding opportunities as an eligible use of Recovery FundsMar. 7, 2023
Related Resources
-
Reports & ToolkitsFY 2024 President's Budget RequestMar. 16, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsStrengthening Local Economies through the Recovery Fund: Executive SummaryMar. 15, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsAmerican Rescue Plan Resource HubMar. 9, 2023
More From
-
Economic momentum, bipartisan hope mark Biden’s return to Legislative Conference
Not satisfied to coast on two years of legislative wins, President Joe Biden charted the path forward for what he called a blue-collar blueprint to rebuild America during his second consecutive address to NACo’s Legislative Conference.
Learn More