
-
BlogOn April 17, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair, in which South Dakota is seeking the authority to collect existing sales taxes on remote purchases, regardless of the retailer’s physical location. In this case, the Supreme Court is reconsidering a previous decision in Quill v.Supreme Court hears oral arguments in remote sales tax collection case
-
Blog
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in remote sales tax collection case
On April 17, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair, in which South Dakota is seeking the authority to collect existing sales taxes on remote purchases, regardless of the retailer’s physical location. In this case, the Supreme Court is reconsidering a previous decision in Quill v. North Dakota (1992) that reaffirmed states and local governments cannot require businesses to collect sales taxes, unless that business has a physical location in that state. The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair by the end of June.
During oral arguments, justices had the opportunity to question each side about the case. Often, justices use this as an opportunity to play devil’s advocate to probe each side’s reasoning. Therefore, it remains difficult to surmise any individual justice’s opinion on the case based on their comments during oral arguments.
Regarding the South Dakota case, Justice Stephen Breyer indicated he found arguments on both sides of the case compelling and questioned several issues, including the difficulty small sellers may face when collecting remote sales taxes, the possibility of retroactive collection of taxes and how much money goes uncollected each year. Other justices, including Justice Antony Kennedy and newly-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch, asked Wayfair’s attorney a series of difficult questions, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke forcefully about the Court’s need to act to overturn Quill, given that – in her view – it was the Court who set the sales tax landscape through the Quill decision.
Multiple justices asked about Congress’ role in this issue, noting Congress has had the power to overrule the Court on Quill since 1992. One justice even went as far as asking what kind of ruling the Court should issue if it hopes to spur action from Congress. In March, lawmakers considered legislation that would have allowed states and local governments to begin collecting these existing remote sales taxes, but ultimately chose not to attach it to the final spending bill given the impending Supreme Court decision.
The issue of collecting remote sales taxes has taken on greater significance in recent years due to the Internet’s growth as a retail marketplace. As a result, state and local governments have lost increasing amounts of revenue in uncollected sales taxes, while brick and mortar businesses continue collecting sales tax revenues that often support the local infrastructure and services on which online retailers rely, creating an unfair playing field between online and local retailers.
NACo supports legislation to permit the collection of existing sales and use taxes from remote sellers and will continue to work with lawmakers to encourage giving counties more authority to enforce the collection of already existing sales and use taxes from remote sellers.
More resources:
Click here to view NACo’s Remote Sales Tax Report
Click here to view NACo’s County Explorer Map on Uncollected Revenue
Click here to view NACo’s Policy Brief on the Collection of Sales Tax on Out-of-State Catalog and Online SalesOn April 17, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair, in which South Dakota is seeking the authority to collect existing sales taxes on remote purchases, regardless of the retailer’s physical location.2018-04-17Blog2018-04-17
On April 17, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. Wayfair, in which South Dakota is seeking the authority to collect existing sales taxes on remote purchases, regardless of the retailer’s physical location. In this case, the Supreme Court is reconsidering a previous decision in Quill v. North Dakota (1992) that reaffirmed states and local governments cannot require businesses to collect sales taxes, unless that business has a physical location in that state. The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair by the end of June.
During oral arguments, justices had the opportunity to question each side about the case. Often, justices use this as an opportunity to play devil’s advocate to probe each side’s reasoning. Therefore, it remains difficult to surmise any individual justice’s opinion on the case based on their comments during oral arguments.
Regarding the South Dakota case, Justice Stephen Breyer indicated he found arguments on both sides of the case compelling and questioned several issues, including the difficulty small sellers may face when collecting remote sales taxes, the possibility of retroactive collection of taxes and how much money goes uncollected each year. Other justices, including Justice Antony Kennedy and newly-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch, asked Wayfair’s attorney a series of difficult questions, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke forcefully about the Court’s need to act to overturn Quill, given that – in her view – it was the Court who set the sales tax landscape through the Quill decision.
Multiple justices asked about Congress’ role in this issue, noting Congress has had the power to overrule the Court on Quill since 1992. One justice even went as far as asking what kind of ruling the Court should issue if it hopes to spur action from Congress. In March, lawmakers considered legislation that would have allowed states and local governments to begin collecting these existing remote sales taxes, but ultimately chose not to attach it to the final spending bill given the impending Supreme Court decision.
The issue of collecting remote sales taxes has taken on greater significance in recent years due to the Internet’s growth as a retail marketplace. As a result, state and local governments have lost increasing amounts of revenue in uncollected sales taxes, while brick and mortar businesses continue collecting sales tax revenues that often support the local infrastructure and services on which online retailers rely, creating an unfair playing field between online and local retailers.
NACo supports legislation to permit the collection of existing sales and use taxes from remote sellers and will continue to work with lawmakers to encourage giving counties more authority to enforce the collection of already existing sales and use taxes from remote sellers.
More resources:
Click here to view NACo’s Remote Sales Tax Report
Click here to view NACo’s County Explorer Map on Uncollected Revenue
Click here to view NACo’s Policy Brief on the Collection of Sales Tax on Out-of-State Catalog and Online Sales

About Jack Peterson (Full Bio)
Director of Strategic Relations
Jack serves as the director of strategic relations. In this role, he works with NACo’s corporate partners, state associations of counties and other affiliate organizations.More from Jack Peterson
-
Blog
Senate passes Inflation Reduction Act
On July 27, Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) unveiled the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), a budget reconciliation bill including several key provisions related to climate and energy, healthcare, tax reform and deficit reduction. -
Blog
What’s the Big Deal with County Parcel Data?
In most counties, parcels data is the most requested data in the county. Why? -
County Profiles
County Governance Project: State Profiles
County governments play an integral role in the everyday lives of residents, from managing roads and bridges to providing public health services and much more. Yet, counties are arguably the least understood level of government in the U.S. – due in part to wide variations in county governance across state lines. -
-
Blog
2022 #NACoAnn Spotlight: County Governance Nuts and Bolts
Explore conference sessions that focus on county governance nuts and bolts. -
Press Release
Metropolitan County Leaders Invest American Rescue Plan Resources in Pandemic Response, Mental Health, Homelessness
Elected leaders from major urban counties with over 4.2 million residents this week outlined how they are deploying resources from the American Rescue Plan to respond to urgent community needs.
-
Reports & Toolkits
State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Resource Hub
Explore NACo's resource hub for the ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund.Reports & Toolkitsdocument010512:15 pmReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> -
Basic page
ClearGov
ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.pagepagepage<p>ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.
-
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
-
Reports & Toolkits
Implementing Infrastructure Investments at the County Level: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (P.L. 117-58)
On November 15, 2021, President Biden enacted the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), formally known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58), into law. This page and its contents are supplemental to NACo's comprehensive legislative analysis of the BIL for counties.Reports & Toolkitsdocument030310:00 amReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent jump">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> -
Reports & Toolkits
Operation Green Light for Veterans: County Toolkit
This coming Veterans Day, NACo and the National Association of County Veteran Service Officers invite counties to join Operation Green Light and show support for veterans by lighting our buildings green from November 7 to November 13.Reports & Toolkitsdocument063012:45 pmReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out wht-text">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> -
Reports & Toolkits
State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Resource Hub
Explore NACo's resource hub for the ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund.Reports & Toolkitsdocument010512:15 pmReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Contact
-
Director of Strategic Relations(202) 661-8805
Related Posts
-
BlogSenate passes Inflation Reduction ActAug. 8, 2022
-
BlogWhat’s the Big Deal with County Parcel Data?Aug. 3, 2022
-
Blog2022 #NACoAnn Spotlight: County Governance Nuts and BoltsJun. 28, 2022
Related Resources
-
County ProfilesCounty Governance Project: State ProfilesJul. 18, 2022
-
Press ReleaseMetropolitan County Leaders Invest American Rescue Plan Resources in Pandemic Response, Mental Health, HomelessnessJun. 24, 2022
-
Reports & ToolkitsCounties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Clean Water, Sewer & Stormwater InfrastructureMay. 24, 2022
More From
-
How communities are investing American Rescue Plan funds with the Local Government ARPA Investment Tracker
The Local Government ARPA Investment Tracker, powered by NACo, Brookings Metro and National League of Cities provides a detailed local investment picture of American Rescue Plan Act funding.
Learn More