Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
-
BlogAs 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation.Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
-
Blog
Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation. Until a legislative solution is found, the amount of uncollected sales taxes that counties, cities and states could use to provide critical public services will continue to grow as the use of the Internet as a retail marketplace continues to surge. As a result, Main Street businesses find themselves at a competitive disadvantage to online retailers, and online retailers and their customers are able to utilize local infrastructure despite not collecting and remitting sales taxes.
A broad coalition representing the government and business communities have long-called for federal remote sales tax legislation and have supported bipartisan solutions in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. To help county officials in their outreach to Congress on this issue during the remainder of this year and into 2017, NACo has developed a new presentation, "Counties Urge Congress to Pass Remote Sales Tax Legislation." The presentation includes background on the remote sales tax issue, an overview of federal remote sales tax legislation and how counties can take action. Counties are encouraged to continue engaging their Senators and Representatives on this long-standing priority of NACo.
Despite not moving forward in the 114th Congress, remote sales tax legislation saw some progress this year. In late August, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, released a discussion draft of his proposed legislation to address the issue – the Online Sales Simplification Act of 2015 (OSSA). While there are some concerns with the legislation, it was a potential signal that the committee may be ready to move some form of legislation. The concerns with the discussion draft are primarily due to how it differs from previous remote sales tax legislation NACo has supported (i.e. Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA – S.698) led by Sens. Enzi (R-Wyo.), Durbin (D-Ill.), Alexander (R-Tenn.), Heitkamp (D-N.D.); and the Remote Transactions Parity Act (RTPA – H.R. 2775) led by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)).
Most notably OSSA utilizes a hybrid-origin system to determine the tax on a remote sale. Previous NACo-supported legislation and the Senate-passed version of Marketplace Fairness in 2013 utilize a destination-based system to source the sale. Destination-based means that whether a remote sale is taxable and the applicable rate are both determined by the customer’s home state. Under the hybrid-origin system, the tax base of the seller’s state is coupled with the tax rate of the buyer’s state to determine the tax applicable to the remote sale. This introduces a system that has not previously been put into practice in the retail world.
The second most notable difference in OSSA is that states would be required to adopt a single statewide tax rate for remote sales. Thus, states that allow local governments to “piggyback” on top of the state sales tax would no longer be able to do that. This essentially prevents local governments from deciding their own sales tax policy. In theory, depending on the state, counties may experience an increase or decrease in tax collections based on the rate that would be adopted.
Progress on this issue was also seen in state legislatures. Several states like South Dakota and Alabama enacted legislation that would require remote sellers to collect sales taxes if they generate over a statutorily set threshold of remote sales in a given year into the state. In other words, even if the remote seller does not have a physical presence in the state, they would be required to collect sales tax as a result of the amount of revenue they are generating from sales within the state. As expected, lawsuits have already been filed by certain businesses challenging the validity of the laws.
The states that are passing or considering such laws are doing so with the intention of generating litigation. The hope is that the cases would go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and provide the Justices with an opportunity to reverse the decision in Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). Quill upheld the requirement that a retailer must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect sales taxes.
Undoubtedly, this is a different approach to address the issue. But given the lack of congressional action, supporters of federal remote sales tax legislation were encouraged in 2015 when Justice Kennedy wrote a concurring opinion in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl,135 S. Ct. 1124, 1135 (2015) in which he argued that given the evolution of technology, it is likely time for the Court to revisit the physical presence standard upheld in the Quill decision.
In 2017, several more states are expected to consider similar legislation. NACo will continue to monitor and report developments in the courts and in Congress as they occur.Resources:
- NACo Policy Brief on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Legislative Presentation on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Marketplace Fairness Action Center
Contact: Mike Belarmino at mbelarmino@naco.org or at 202.942.4254
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation.2016-12-08Blog2016-12-13
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation. Until a legislative solution is found, the amount of uncollected sales taxes that counties, cities and states could use to provide critical public services will continue to grow as the use of the Internet as a retail marketplace continues to surge. As a result, Main Street businesses find themselves at a competitive disadvantage to online retailers, and online retailers and their customers are able to utilize local infrastructure despite not collecting and remitting sales taxes.
A broad coalition representing the government and business communities have long-called for federal remote sales tax legislation and have supported bipartisan solutions in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. To help county officials in their outreach to Congress on this issue during the remainder of this year and into 2017, NACo has developed a new presentation, "Counties Urge Congress to Pass Remote Sales Tax Legislation." The presentation includes background on the remote sales tax issue, an overview of federal remote sales tax legislation and how counties can take action. Counties are encouraged to continue engaging their Senators and Representatives on this long-standing priority of NACo.
Despite not moving forward in the 114th Congress, remote sales tax legislation saw some progress this year. In late August, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, released a discussion draft of his proposed legislation to address the issue – the Online Sales Simplification Act of 2015 (OSSA). While there are some concerns with the legislation, it was a potential signal that the committee may be ready to move some form of legislation. The concerns with the discussion draft are primarily due to how it differs from previous remote sales tax legislation NACo has supported (i.e. Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA – S.698) led by Sens. Enzi (R-Wyo.), Durbin (D-Ill.), Alexander (R-Tenn.), Heitkamp (D-N.D.); and the Remote Transactions Parity Act (RTPA – H.R. 2775) led by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)).
Most notably OSSA utilizes a hybrid-origin system to determine the tax on a remote sale. Previous NACo-supported legislation and the Senate-passed version of Marketplace Fairness in 2013 utilize a destination-based system to source the sale. Destination-based means that whether a remote sale is taxable and the applicable rate are both determined by the customer’s home state. Under the hybrid-origin system, the tax base of the seller’s state is coupled with the tax rate of the buyer’s state to determine the tax applicable to the remote sale. This introduces a system that has not previously been put into practice in the retail world.
The second most notable difference in OSSA is that states would be required to adopt a single statewide tax rate for remote sales. Thus, states that allow local governments to “piggyback” on top of the state sales tax would no longer be able to do that. This essentially prevents local governments from deciding their own sales tax policy. In theory, depending on the state, counties may experience an increase or decrease in tax collections based on the rate that would be adopted.
Progress on this issue was also seen in state legislatures. Several states like South Dakota and Alabama enacted legislation that would require remote sellers to collect sales taxes if they generate over a statutorily set threshold of remote sales in a given year into the state. In other words, even if the remote seller does not have a physical presence in the state, they would be required to collect sales tax as a result of the amount of revenue they are generating from sales within the state. As expected, lawsuits have already been filed by certain businesses challenging the validity of the laws.
The states that are passing or considering such laws are doing so with the intention of generating litigation. The hope is that the cases would go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and provide the Justices with an opportunity to reverse the decision in Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). Quill upheld the requirement that a retailer must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect sales taxes.
Undoubtedly, this is a different approach to address the issue. But given the lack of congressional action, supporters of federal remote sales tax legislation were encouraged in 2015 when Justice Kennedy wrote a concurring opinion in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl,135 S. Ct. 1124, 1135 (2015) in which he argued that given the evolution of technology, it is likely time for the Court to revisit the physical presence standard upheld in the Quill decision.
In 2017, several more states are expected to consider similar legislation. NACo will continue to monitor and report developments in the courts and in Congress as they occur.
Resources:
- NACo Policy Brief on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Legislative Presentation on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Marketplace Fairness Action Center
Contact: Mike Belarmino at mbelarmino@naco.org or at 202.942.4254

About Mike Belarmino (Full Bio)
Senior Policy Advisor, Government Finance Officers Association
Mike Belarmino is a senior policy advisor at the Government Finance Officers Association. He previously served as NACo's Associate Legislative Director for Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs and Associate General Counsel.More from Mike Belarmino
-
Webinar
NACo Briefing for Newly Elected Congressional Staff on Counties & the Federal Grant Process
Jun. 8, 2023 , 3:00 pm – 4:00 pmOver the past two years, new federal laws have led to a significant increase in funding becoming available directly to counties. As a result, it is crucial for communities to understand how to navigate these opportunities and maximize these funding streams. -
Webinar
Worried about inflation? Strategies for Increasing Non-Tax Revenues.
Jun. 8, 2023 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pmHosted by Joe Rulison, CEO, and William (Bill) Cherry- Director of Public Partnerships of three+one. This webinar will equip you with the latest knowledge and trends in liquidity management. This presentation is designed to help you optimize your cash management operations and generate new revenue streams. -
Press Release
National Association of Counties Issues Statement on Bipartisan Debt Ceiling Deal
WASHINGTON – The National Association of Counties (NACo) today issued the following statement urging Congress to pass the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, a bill to provide for an increase to the debt ceiling and avoid default on the national debt. NACo Executive Director Matthew Chase said: -
Blog
Counties & the national debt: What defaulting on the national debt could mean for counties
At some point soon the United States government could default on the national debt. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has stated that if the federal debt ceiling is not raised by June 5, the federal government could miss or delay payments on their obligations resulting in a technical default. -
Blog
Pima County leans into innovation to enhance sustainability
This blog post is sponsored by NACo partner American Gas Association. Unlock the potential of wastewater facilities: Transform waste into clean, renewable energy and contribute to your county's sustainability goals.
-
Reports & Toolkits
American Rescue Plan Resource Hub
In March of 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorized the $350 billion State and Local Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), which provided $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid to every county in America.Reports & Toolkitsdocument03092:00 pmReports & Toolkits<p>In March of 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 authorized the $350 billion State and Local Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund (Recovery Fund), which provided $65.1 billion in direct, flexible aid to
-
Basic page
ClearGov
ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.pagepagepage<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr> -
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2022-2023 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
Contact
-
Senior Policy Advisor, Government Finance Officers Association
Related Posts
-
BlogCounties & the national debt: What defaulting on the national debt could mean for countiesMay. 25, 2023
-
BlogBipartisan Senators reintroduce legislation to restore tax-exempt status of advance refunding bondsMay. 17, 2023
-
BlogPima County leans into innovation to enhance sustainabilityMay. 9, 2023
Related Resources
-
Press ReleaseNational Association of Counties Issues Statement on Bipartisan Debt Ceiling DealMay. 29, 2023
-
Reports & ToolkitsMyths & Facts: American Rescue Plan Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery FundsApr. 24, 2023
-
DocumentState and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction Legislation in the 118th CongressApr. 6, 2023
More From
-
Legislative Analysis for Counties: The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023
This analysis includes funding highlights for key programs impacting counties.
Learn More