Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
-
BlogAs 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation.Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
-
Blog
Counties urge Congress to act on remote sales tax legislation: NACo releases new MFA presentation
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation. Until a legislative solution is found, the amount of uncollected sales taxes that counties, cities and states could use to provide critical public services will continue to grow as the use of the Internet as a retail marketplace continues to surge. As a result, Main Street businesses find themselves at a competitive disadvantage to online retailers, and online retailers and their customers are able to utilize local infrastructure despite not collecting and remitting sales taxes.
A broad coalition representing the government and business communities have long-called for federal remote sales tax legislation and have supported bipartisan solutions in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. To help county officials in their outreach to Congress on this issue during the remainder of this year and into 2017, NACo has developed a new presentation, "Counties Urge Congress to Pass Remote Sales Tax Legislation." The presentation includes background on the remote sales tax issue, an overview of federal remote sales tax legislation and how counties can take action. Counties are encouraged to continue engaging their Senators and Representatives on this long-standing priority of NACo.
Despite not moving forward in the 114th Congress, remote sales tax legislation saw some progress this year. In late August, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, released a discussion draft of his proposed legislation to address the issue – the Online Sales Simplification Act of 2015 (OSSA). While there are some concerns with the legislation, it was a potential signal that the committee may be ready to move some form of legislation. The concerns with the discussion draft are primarily due to how it differs from previous remote sales tax legislation NACo has supported (i.e. Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA – S.698) led by Sens. Enzi (R-Wyo.), Durbin (D-Ill.), Alexander (R-Tenn.), Heitkamp (D-N.D.); and the Remote Transactions Parity Act (RTPA – H.R. 2775) led by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)).
Most notably OSSA utilizes a hybrid-origin system to determine the tax on a remote sale. Previous NACo-supported legislation and the Senate-passed version of Marketplace Fairness in 2013 utilize a destination-based system to source the sale. Destination-based means that whether a remote sale is taxable and the applicable rate are both determined by the customer’s home state. Under the hybrid-origin system, the tax base of the seller’s state is coupled with the tax rate of the buyer’s state to determine the tax applicable to the remote sale. This introduces a system that has not previously been put into practice in the retail world.
The second most notable difference in OSSA is that states would be required to adopt a single statewide tax rate for remote sales. Thus, states that allow local governments to “piggyback” on top of the state sales tax would no longer be able to do that. This essentially prevents local governments from deciding their own sales tax policy. In theory, depending on the state, counties may experience an increase or decrease in tax collections based on the rate that would be adopted.
Progress on this issue was also seen in state legislatures. Several states like South Dakota and Alabama enacted legislation that would require remote sellers to collect sales taxes if they generate over a statutorily set threshold of remote sales in a given year into the state. In other words, even if the remote seller does not have a physical presence in the state, they would be required to collect sales tax as a result of the amount of revenue they are generating from sales within the state. As expected, lawsuits have already been filed by certain businesses challenging the validity of the laws.
The states that are passing or considering such laws are doing so with the intention of generating litigation. The hope is that the cases would go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and provide the Justices with an opportunity to reverse the decision in Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). Quill upheld the requirement that a retailer must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect sales taxes.
Undoubtedly, this is a different approach to address the issue. But given the lack of congressional action, supporters of federal remote sales tax legislation were encouraged in 2015 when Justice Kennedy wrote a concurring opinion in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl,135 S. Ct. 1124, 1135 (2015) in which he argued that given the evolution of technology, it is likely time for the Court to revisit the physical presence standard upheld in the Quill decision.
In 2017, several more states are expected to consider similar legislation. NACo will continue to monitor and report developments in the courts and in Congress as they occur.Resources:
- NACo Policy Brief on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Legislative Presentation on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Marketplace Fairness Action Center
Contact: Mike Belarmino at mbelarmino@naco.org or at 202.942.4254
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation.2016-12-08Blog2016-12-13
As 2016 begins to wind down, counties will see another holiday shopping season and the end of another session of Congress without the passage of federal remote sales tax legislation. Until a legislative solution is found, the amount of uncollected sales taxes that counties, cities and states could use to provide critical public services will continue to grow as the use of the Internet as a retail marketplace continues to surge. As a result, Main Street businesses find themselves at a competitive disadvantage to online retailers, and online retailers and their customers are able to utilize local infrastructure despite not collecting and remitting sales taxes.
A broad coalition representing the government and business communities have long-called for federal remote sales tax legislation and have supported bipartisan solutions in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives. To help county officials in their outreach to Congress on this issue during the remainder of this year and into 2017, NACo has developed a new presentation, "Counties Urge Congress to Pass Remote Sales Tax Legislation." The presentation includes background on the remote sales tax issue, an overview of federal remote sales tax legislation and how counties can take action. Counties are encouraged to continue engaging their Senators and Representatives on this long-standing priority of NACo.
Despite not moving forward in the 114th Congress, remote sales tax legislation saw some progress this year. In late August, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, released a discussion draft of his proposed legislation to address the issue – the Online Sales Simplification Act of 2015 (OSSA). While there are some concerns with the legislation, it was a potential signal that the committee may be ready to move some form of legislation. The concerns with the discussion draft are primarily due to how it differs from previous remote sales tax legislation NACo has supported (i.e. Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA – S.698) led by Sens. Enzi (R-Wyo.), Durbin (D-Ill.), Alexander (R-Tenn.), Heitkamp (D-N.D.); and the Remote Transactions Parity Act (RTPA – H.R. 2775) led by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)).
Most notably OSSA utilizes a hybrid-origin system to determine the tax on a remote sale. Previous NACo-supported legislation and the Senate-passed version of Marketplace Fairness in 2013 utilize a destination-based system to source the sale. Destination-based means that whether a remote sale is taxable and the applicable rate are both determined by the customer’s home state. Under the hybrid-origin system, the tax base of the seller’s state is coupled with the tax rate of the buyer’s state to determine the tax applicable to the remote sale. This introduces a system that has not previously been put into practice in the retail world.
The second most notable difference in OSSA is that states would be required to adopt a single statewide tax rate for remote sales. Thus, states that allow local governments to “piggyback” on top of the state sales tax would no longer be able to do that. This essentially prevents local governments from deciding their own sales tax policy. In theory, depending on the state, counties may experience an increase or decrease in tax collections based on the rate that would be adopted.
Progress on this issue was also seen in state legislatures. Several states like South Dakota and Alabama enacted legislation that would require remote sellers to collect sales taxes if they generate over a statutorily set threshold of remote sales in a given year into the state. In other words, even if the remote seller does not have a physical presence in the state, they would be required to collect sales tax as a result of the amount of revenue they are generating from sales within the state. As expected, lawsuits have already been filed by certain businesses challenging the validity of the laws.
The states that are passing or considering such laws are doing so with the intention of generating litigation. The hope is that the cases would go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and provide the Justices with an opportunity to reverse the decision in Quill v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). Quill upheld the requirement that a retailer must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect sales taxes.
Undoubtedly, this is a different approach to address the issue. But given the lack of congressional action, supporters of federal remote sales tax legislation were encouraged in 2015 when Justice Kennedy wrote a concurring opinion in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl,135 S. Ct. 1124, 1135 (2015) in which he argued that given the evolution of technology, it is likely time for the Court to revisit the physical presence standard upheld in the Quill decision.
In 2017, several more states are expected to consider similar legislation. NACo will continue to monitor and report developments in the courts and in Congress as they occur.
Resources:
- NACo Policy Brief on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Legislative Presentation on Remote Sales Tax
- NACo Marketplace Fairness Action Center
Contact: Mike Belarmino at mbelarmino@naco.org or at 202.942.4254

About Mike Belarmino (Full Bio)
Senior Policy Advisor, Government Finance Officers Association
Mike Belarmino is a senior policy advisor at the Government Finance Officers Association. He previously served as NACo's Associate Legislative Director for Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs and Associate General Counsel.More from Mike Belarmino
-
-
Blog
2022 #NACoAnn Spotlight: County Governance Nuts and Bolts
The NACo Annual Conference & Exposition is the largest meeting of county elected and appointed officials from across the country. -
Press Release
Metropolitan County Leaders Invest American Rescue Plan Resources in Pandemic Response, Mental Health, Homelessness
Elected leaders from major urban counties with over 4.2 million residents this week outlined how they are deploying resources from the American Rescue Plan to respond to urgent community needs. -
Webinar
County Roundtable Discussion on ClearGov’s Budget Cycle Management Suite
Jun. 16, 2022 , 1:00 pm – 2:00 pmJoin your fellow NACo members for a curated roundtable discussion with ClearGov, our new strategic partner. ClearGov shares our conviction that stronger counties result in a stronger America. During this live webinar, you will learn about ClearGov's powerful, easy-to-use Budget Cycle Management suite. -
Blog
Treasury releases updated Compliance and Reporting Guidance for counties ahead of July reporting deadline
As part of the conditions for accepting State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, counties must submit regular Project and Expenditure (P&E) Reports detailing how Recovery Funds are obligated and spent. -
Blog
Treasury releases Fiscal Recovery Fund public reporting data through end of 2021
Treasury released Fiscal Recovery Fund reporting data of counties with a population over 250,000 or an award over $10 million through the end of 2021.
-
Reports & Toolkits
State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Resource Hub
Explore NACo's resource hub for the ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund.Reports & Toolkitsdocument010512:15 pmReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> -
Basic page
ClearGov
ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.pagepagepage<p>ClearGov® is the leading provider of Budget Cycle Management software, focused on helping local governments streamline the annual budgeting process by improving the collection, creation, and communication of their budgets.
-
Basic page
Finance, Pensions & Intergovernmental Affairs Steering Committee
All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues. Policy Platform & Resolutions 2021-2022 2022 NACo Legislative Prioritiespagepagepage<p>All matters pertaining to the financial resources of counties, fiscal management, federal assistance, municipal borrowing, county revenues, federal budget, federal tax reform, elections and Native American issues.</p>
-
Reports & Toolkits
Implementing Infrastructure Investments at the County Level: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (P.L. 117-58)
On November 15, 2021, President Biden enacted the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), formally known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58), into law. This page and its contents are supplemental to NACo's comprehensive legislative analysis of the BIL for counties.Reports & Toolkitsdocument030310:00 amReports & Toolkits<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%" summary="call-out transparent jump">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Contact
-
Senior Policy Advisor, Government Finance Officers Association
Related Posts
-
Blog2022 #NACoAnn Spotlight: County Governance Nuts and BoltsJun. 28, 2022
-
BlogTreasury releases updated Compliance and Reporting Guidance for counties ahead of July reporting deadlineJun. 15, 2022
-
BlogTreasury releases Fiscal Recovery Fund public reporting data through end of 2021May. 26, 2022
Related Resources
-
Press ReleaseMetropolitan County Leaders Invest American Rescue Plan Resources in Pandemic Response, Mental Health, HomelessnessJun. 24, 2022
-
Reports & ToolkitsCounties and the American Rescue Plan Act Recovery Fund: Clean Water, Sewer & Stormwater InfrastructureMay. 24, 2022
-
Press ReleaseCounties Applaud Additional COVID Recovery Aid Flexibility in Bipartisan Senate BillApr. 5, 2022
More From
-
American Rescue Plan Act Funding Breakdown
Explore NACo's interactive tool that helps navigate the roughly $1.5 trillion in county related funding from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
Learn More