Search

NACo > Legislation & Policy > Washington Watch > Posts > FCC Examines Local Government Policies on Wireless Infrastructure Siting
October 04
FCC Examines Local Government Policies on Wireless Infrastructure Siting

On September 26, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that scrutinizes local government policies and practices on wireless infrastructure collocation, siting and the shot clock (2009 Declaratory Ruling later affirmed in FCC v. City of Arlington).  At issue is section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 which states that “… a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station.”  Though the FCC has offered interpretive guidance on the main terms of the statute, it now tentatively finds that further clarification would serve the public interest.  In this NPRM, the FCC seeks input from stakeholders on how to define the following:

  • ​“Transmission equipment”
  • “Exiting wireless tower or base station”
  • “Substantially change the physical dimensions"
  • “Collocation”

The NPRM is not seeking to revisit the issue of what constitutes a “reasonable period of time” but rather is examining the real world effect of the “shot clock” ruling. The shot clock refers to the FCC’s interpretation of a “reasonable period of time” for a state or local government to act on a request for placement, construction, or modification of personal wireless service facilities. The FCC determined that a “reasonable period of time” for a local government to act was 90 days for processing collocation applications and 150 days for processing all other siting applications; this interpretation was later affirmed by the Supreme Court in FCC v. City of Arlington.  If the local government body fails to act on wireless siting application(s) within the 90 or 150 day window, the applicant then is able to pursue judicial relief within the next 30 days.  However, in the event that a local government entity finds the application “incomplete,” the 90 and 150 day requirement can be adjusted.  The FCC now asks whether further clarification is needed as to when to deem a siting application “complete.” 

The FCC also seeks comment on local government treatment of different technologies namely, distributed antenna system (DAS). Some jurisdictions have determined that DAS does not fall within the scope of the shot clock because DAS tends to include a large number of sites, dense sites, and generally have a large presence in public rights-of-way. The FCC now seeks comment on whether there is any reason to treat DAS differently from other technologies like small cells.

Additionally, the FCC is seeking comment on whether local government ordinances that establish a preference for placing wireless facilities on local government property creates an unfair discriminatory effect against providers of functionally equivalent services. 

Regarding wireless communications facilities siting, NACo supports preservation of local authority with minimal limitations and supports nondiscriminatory, timely action. Counties are encouraged to examine their wireless siting practices and policies and ensure that county policies are in accord with existing FCC regulations.  Counties that wish to comment on the FCC NPRM should contact Telecommunication and Technology Associate Legislative Director, Yejin Jang (contact information is below).

Contact: Yejin Jang yjang@naco.org 202.942.4239​ 

Comments

There are no comments for this post.