
Previous story | Table of Contents | Next
story
The HR Doctor Is In
"The Human
Side of E-Mail"
Dear HR Doctor:
The HR Doctor received a lot of feedback on the policy suggestions made
in a recent column about e-mail, published in County News. Extracts
from an exchange with Ed Williams, assistant county administrator of McLean
County, Ill., highlight an important issue that Ed was kind enough to raise
- by e-mail, of course:
"Like numerous employers, we put out a regular newsletter that contains
such things as employee advertisements to sell cars, furniture, etc. These
types of items were cluttering up our e-mail bulletin boards. Rather than
prohibit it, we decided it was an issue of a healthy workforce, 'employee
friendly' to continue it, so we had data processing create a bulletin board
which was for non-business purposes. This relieved the 'business' bulletin
board of a lot traffic while retaining the employee's ability to advertise
their cars, boats, houses, etc., for sale.
"I know it is a touchy issue, but I am also inclined to allow announcements
even if they are of a religious nature. I personally think it may violate
the constitutional separation of church and state to allow employees to
have a Bible in the public's view on their desks, but I see nothing wrong
with their posting notices of church meetings/events on our bulletin board.
The messages are not read by the general public and employees are not 'targeted'
by such messages. They are free to pay attention or disregard them.
"Although I agree that an e-mail policy must prohibit any activity
which is otherwise prohibited, such as sexual or any other type of harassment,
I would bet that everyone realizes that personal messages continue and,
in fact, can also be healthy. It is more convenient for employees to use
e-mail because the other employee doesn't even have to be there, it is less
disruptive to the other employees because he/she can read and reply at his
or her convenience instead of being interrupted while busy.
"In short, I prefer a policy which recognizes our diversity and
allows people to 'connect' to others at work. I think our e-mail policies
need to reflect the legitimacy of personal messages so that some people
will not feel guilty about violating a policy which they know is regularly
violated. Thanks for listening. That's my two-cents worth."
Ed
Dear Ed,
Thanks for taking the time to write and thanks for reading the HR Doctor's
columns. I hope you enjoy them.
The idea of using the e-mail network for "business purposes"
should not be taken so rigidly that we, in effect, surrender to a "bean
counter's" definition of "business purpose."
I believe you are very correct in stating that improving employee morale
and communications through mechanisms, including permitting e-mail use to
announce charity events, good news, success stories, suggestion program
winners, the county employee picnic, etc., would constitute a "legitimate
public purpose" being served. Some places are moving to an "Intra-net"
that includes specific space for an employee bulletin board for classified
ads, birthday greetings, announcements, etc. That way, there is a place
in the system where one can go to read this information without it being
"inflicted" on the entire network of e-mail subscribers.
What is problematic, i.e., would be tough to articulate a "legitimate
public purpose," would be religious messages, in terms of content,
or proselytizing messages. You bring up very valid points and I appreciate
the fact that you took the time to write and remind us of the human side
of e-mail.
Best regards,
The HR Doctor
(The HR Doctor was written by Phil
Rosenberg, director of Human Resources, Broward County, Fla.)
Previous story | Table of Contents | Next
story |