CNCounty News

Counties’ role in health care likely to be impacted in Trump Administration

Paul Ryan’s health care restructuring proposal would mean per capita cap or block grant for Medicaid

One of the promises President-elect Trump made to his supporters was to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare.  Congressional Republicans have also made Obamacare a target for repeal and have proposed significant changes to other federal health care programs.

What might this mean for county governments, which play a pivotal role in caring for America’s low-income residents, especially serving as the safety net for those who are unable to afford medical care?

Historically, most states have required counties to provide health care for low-income, uninsured or underinsured residents — care that is often not reimbursed.  An Urban Institute study estimated that states and localities spent $20 billion on uncompensated care in 2013.

Meanwhile, counties invest $83 billion annually in community health systems and support 976 hospitals, 714 long-term care facilities, 750 behavioral health authorities and more than 1,900 local public health departments.

The federal entitlement program known as Medicaid is the largest source of health coverage in the country, covering approximately 75 million individuals.

Established in 1965, Medicaid is federal-state-local partnership that provides health insurance coverage to low-income children and their families, seniors and people with disabilities. Unlike Medicare, which is financed and administered by the federal government, Medicaid is jointly financed by the federal government and the states, with local governments’ support in many states. Counties contribute to the program in 26 states, and in the latest year in which data is available, local governments contributed approximately $28 billion to the program.

The ACA expanded Medicaid. States were offered the option to expand the population served by the Medicaid program to include low-income adults without children. 

Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia exercised that option to expand coverage beyond families, children, pregnant women, the elderly and the disabled. Medicaid reduces the amount of uncompensated care that must be provided by county health systems, easing the strain on county budgets.

Yet the Medicaid expansion is likely the most vulnerable provision of the ACA under a Trump Administration and a Republican Congress.

In June, House Speaker Paul Ryan and the House Republican Task Force on Health Care Reform unveiled a white paper describing a vision to restructure America’s health care system as a part of Ryan’s A Better Way Campaign. If enacted, the proposal would withdraw the states’ option to expand the Medicaid program and would require them to accept either a new Medicaid per-capita cap allotment or a block grant.

Under this plan, beginning in 2019, each state would receive a fixed limit of federal funding for four categories of beneficiaries – the aged, disabled, adults, and children — amounts based on 2016 averages. Funding would be adjusted for inflation, which typically rises slower than health care costs.

States opting out of a per capita cap could receive a block grant, which would have a similar effect. As health care costs inevitably exceed the amount allotted by the federal government, states and counties would be left the bear the burden.   

“Counties are very concerned about the risks of changing the structure of Medicaid from an open-ended, federal-state-local partnership to a new cap or block grant model,” said Fulton County, Ga., Commissioner Joan Garner, chair of NACo’s health policy steering committee.

“When health care costs rise or if there is another economic downturn, states and — more likely, counties — will be on the hook to cover the gap between the federal allotment and the local need.”

In the upcoming weeks, President-elect Trump and the incoming Administration and Congress will need to determine just how they will change the health care system to follow through on their promises to undo the ACA.

 In that process, counties must ensure that the federal-state-local partnership is respected and financial burdens are not simply shifted to counties. As the public’s attention will be placed on Washington and states, counties must work with their members of Congress to remind them that all health is local. Impending changes in the nation’s complex health care system must take into account the role of counties.


Paul Beddoe, deputy legislative director, contributed to this report.

Tagged In:

Attachments

Related News

Man at call center
Advocacy

FCC takes critical steps to improve the 988 National Suicide Lifeline

On March 21, bipartisan congressional leaders and FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced steps to improve the 988 National Suicide Lifeline. This announcement marks major progress on the nation’s crisis response, a priority for counties and a key policy pillar of the NACo Commission on Mental Health and Wellbeing.

Nurse and older man
Advocacy

House Ways and Means Committee passes bill blocking proposed CMS nursing home minimal staffing rule

On March 5, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means marked up and reported out of committee the Protect America’s Senior’s Access to Care Act (H.R. 7513). 

Nurse and doctor
Advocacy

HHS releases final rule on substance use confidentiality

In February, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) introduced a Final Rule amending the regulations governing the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records at 42 CFR part 2.